Preview

Internal Tensions: Wilhelmine Germany

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1603 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Internal Tensions: Wilhelmine Germany
To what extent was Wilhelmine Germany rived by internal tensions’
There were many reasons as to why Wilhelmine Germany had internal tensions and strains. A lot of these reasons are to do with the political side and the contradictions to do within Germany being seen as constitutional and democratic and then not issuing any of these policies. There are issues within the political parties themselves and conflating ideologies, as well as with the chancellors, the Kaiser and the government. Again another source of tensions was the growing minorities and varying races and religions making up a large part of Whilhelmine Germany, whom were treated immorally. All of these strains add up to make a tension filled country with a lot of underlying
…show more content…
There were many different political parties within the Reichstag with opposing views and opinions. There was the Centre Party, with strong catholic values and supporters, this again links back to the tensions within the minorities and a religion also as this was a fairly popular party during this time. There was also the Free Conservative Reich party who were extremely conservative supported by the landowners, the Junkers, and the industrialists, therefore having large support, as well as the Wilhelmine society being predominantly conservative. Then there was the Social Democratic Society (SPD) supported by the workers, this became increasingly the most popular party. Its growing recognition within the Whilhelmine population caused tensions because up until 1980 socialism had been outlawed, however by 1912 it was the largest party in the Reichstag as the urban/industrial Germany was increasing. The standard of living was low o the workers looked to the socialists, essentially a Marxist party they looked for revolution. The want for revolution and the mass support for this party scared the Kaiser causing underlying tensions within the Reichstag. However the SPD were reducing their want for revolution and manifested as trade unions and strikes, although this still caused problems for the Kaiser. Wilhelm II didn’t consult the …show more content…
Despite having a Reichstag and various political parties within, showing different views, the country was still essentially run by the Kaiser. The Kaiser had the power to summon the Reichstag and dismiss it when he pleased, this clearely caused unrest as in spite of there being a government, and Wilhelm II had overruling authority. Again, as well as controlling the fate of the Reichstag, the Kaiser was also the one whom appointed the chancellors and all government ministers and it was these ministers who would propose legislation for the two houses of parliament. So from this we can see, despite not directly controlling the state through political decisions made by him, he could decide who he wanted as chancellor and when he wished to dismiss them. An example of this was Von Caprivi, the chancellor appointed in 1890 taking over from Von Bismarck, he let the Kaiser know that if appointed he would be compliant, possibly why he was chosen as then Whilhelm would have effortless ruling. However, showing again that it is an authoritarian state, and somewhat dictatorial, the Kaiser removed Caprivi as he felt he was too progressive. Caprivi wanted a cooperative Reichstag and to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining the political status quo through more than just the policy of moderate reform, I would argue. Certainly the policy of moderate reform helped placate and divide socialists and liberals, the groups demanding social and constitutional change, to an extent. However, it is clear that the inflexible constitution itself that kept the ultimate power always in the Kaiser’s hands succeeded in maintaining the political status quo to a much further extent. The nationalism and patriotism upholding the Kaiser’s constitutional powers were very significant, as the vast majority of the German population and the breadth of the political nation valued the Kaiser, so he did not face any serious challenges in this period. This nationalism and patriotism was particularly felt by the traditional elites, who the constitution favoured, and pressed for nationalist foreign policy to unite against threats to the status quo, which did soak up a lot of the tensions of the period. It should also be noted despite this attempt to present a united front against threats to the status quo, parties looking after sectional interests meant that a disunity of the parties in the Reichstag did little for the cause of significant political modernisation, unable to work together to make any coherent challenges.…

    • 2396 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Stresemann Recover

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1923 was an extremely crucial time for Germany with a great shift in culture, economy and government. It was falling apart; the German economy had collapsed due to the striking between German workers and French occupiers. Hyperinflation rose so much that the German people were forced to using suitcases and wheelbarrows to carrying money not to mention the fact that the collapse of the currency caused even more havoc within the economy. Due to the French’s despise and hate for Germany they tried to encourage the Rhineland to break away, this then became a Rhineland Independence Movement which made France’s intentions possible. Furthermore left wing communist governments had taken matters into their own hands. They took control of Berlin and Hitler attempted the Beer Hall Putsch in November 1923 to overthrow the government, whilst other politicians broke away from Germany. That is what led Stresemann being appointed chancellor and foreign minister of a grand coalition government.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A major flaw in the Weimar constitution was the proportional representation electoral system, which was an attempt to become more democratic. Democracy comes at the price of a strong government as it is usually difficult to form a stable government in a democracy. This can be manifested by the fact that in the mere period of 14 years, there were 21 different governments and 13 chancellors. This shows that the Weimar government lacked stability and strength which would make it almost impossible for the government to be effective and tackle the problems. How could the government solve the difficult troubles that Germany was facing, when they could not even manage to cooperate and unite? Since, proportional representation is one of the fairest electoral systems, it was impossible to form a strong single party government who had a good hold in the Reichstag and only weak coalitions which could not agree upon a decision was formed. Weak coalitions meant ineffective and incompetent governments. On the other hand, it could be said that the Weimar governments were not as unstable as it is claimed to be. The Weimar constitution has produced effective and stable governments such as the grand coalition which was seen as a strong government and it stood for the longest amount of time. Also, despite the numerous changes in government, the base parties of…

    • 999 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was a parliamentary democracy based on the constitution that Germany was run by. The Bundesrat being part of the constitution consisted of 58 members who were elected by the state assemblies, the Bundesrat had the power in theory to the law making process and by this having this possibly the right to alter the constitution. The Bundesrat had the power to veto legislation against a bill, therefore being able to stop such laws that would not be in favour of Germany. As well as this, the Bundesrat and the Reichstag had joint legislative power. The Reichstag was elected members represented by constituencies and were all male over the age of twenty five. One of the most significant points in favour of Germany being a democracy is that Bismark introduced universal male suffrage elections in 1871. This is clearly an example of a parliamentary democracy because it allowed people of all classes to vote; meaning that every layer of society had the opportunity to be represented. However importantly over the Bundesrat the Reichstag was significantly in power of the financial affairs and the banking system of Germany and perhaps most importantly the control the Reichstag had over the defence budget which was vital federal government expenditure. It had grown from being 100 million marks in 1890 to rapidly increasing to 2,405 million marks by 1913. Although the Kaiser did have the right to dissolve the Reichstag they still could hold elections after this. Furthermore the constitution was based on parliamentary democracy to an extent because members were elected into their positions. They held the power of money that…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although initially it seems apparent that the First World War narrowed the existing political divisions in Germany during this period, as the war progressed, the resentment grew, in part because of the huge losses and the economic crisis that hung over the country. Therefore because of this the political divisions increased, and by the end of the war the polarisation of German politics was explicit.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The new Weimer Republic lacked support from to run a proper democracy, they relied heavily on the Reichswehr and the Freikorps. Although the Reichswehr fought against the communists, they were not loyal to the democratic republic. They believed that they were “Stabbed in the back”, when Ebert’s government (November Criminals) signed the Treaty of Versailles. The population did not recognise the fact that they would not have lasted the end of the war without being entirely crushed. The Reichswehr supported the right, so during the beer hall putsch they refused to defend the new government, they stated “Reichswehr does not fire on Reichswehr. The new government was in between the left and right, however after the war the working class (the majority of the population) tended to support the two extremes, conservative and communist. The new government forced a new constitution to be drawn up, this included article 48- which could suspend the fundamental rights of the citizens if public order and security were seriously disturbed. The new government was due to the treaty of Versailles and the revolution.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Kaiser was definitely the figure head in German society before the war he did have a framework in which he had work in, this was created in 1871 and was set out in an entrenched constitution making it very hard for him to stray from. Not only this by the Kaiser could not simply ignore the Reichstag, it did have power to endorse or reject legislation including finance bills. Moreover not only did Germany have a somewhat fair political system but…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period 1900-1914, Germany’s political landscape witnessed extraordinary changes in which typical features associated with a parliamentary democracy- such as significant and influential pressure group activity and universal suffrage- were present. It can however be argued that this period also represented a time in which the German Reichstag did not truly represent the population due to old and corrupt voting system for Prussia which saw votes unfairly given and the role of all the chancellors- in particular Von Bulow- during this time, which saw unelected officials yielding greater influence than that of the Reichstag. Germany was a parliamentary democracy due to the many contrasting features of the political system. Germany may have had many features where a “parliamentary democracy” can be boasted, but there are also just as many contrasting points which expose the system as being corrupt and broken.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Von Schleicher then resigned after failing to gain any more support in the Reichstag and Von Papen persuaded Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as Chancellor as he warned of a civil war and civil unrest. Hindenburg agreed on the condition that the Nazis had fewer seats in the cabinet.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    german history

    • 22532 Words
    • 91 Pages

    If you have any problems with accessing this, please contact your programme leader or Alison Barton at UCLan ajbarton@uclan.ac.uk…

    • 22532 Words
    • 91 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The German Imperial Constitution of 1871 was widely regarded by contemporaries to be one of the most democratic in the world. People commented at the time how it was more democratic than the UK system of first-past-the-post and the people of Germany were proud that their country was now the European capital of democracy. The Reichstag had universal male suffrage over the age of 25 and was elected by secret ballot. The people felt that they had the true power in Germany as any legislation that was proposed by the Chancellor had to be passed by them and as well as this they could stop any form of direct taxation put forward by the Imperial Government (who could only raise indirect taxes without consent) through blocking such. However, the Reichstag was not nearly as democratic as it initially seems: it couldn’t produce its own legislation and the only person who could, the Chancellor, couldn’t be removed by them. Similarly the Kaiser and Ministers were untouchable. Whilst the people of Germany voted for who represented them the very fact that the members of the Reichstag were unpaid guaranteed an unfair representation of conservative members, ironic considering it is meant to be the most democratic constitution using proportional representation. The Bundesrat was the collection of 58 representatives who spoke for the federal states of Germany. This was thought to be democratic as it…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Second Reich constitution, it is clear that during the years of the Second Reich there was no democracy. The German Electorates could only elect the Reichstag, which had little power. The Reichstag was only able to accept or reject the laws that were proposed by the government and veto treaties agreed by the Kaiser. However, the Kaiser was able to summon and dissolve the Reichstag at any given time. Therefore most of the time the Reichstag would agree with Kaiser, which shows Kaiser Absolutism. This was similar for the Imperial Government. The Chancellor and the Cabinet did the day-to-day running of the Germany. However, at any given time the German Emperor was able to dismiss the Chancellor. Therefore at the end if something was not going according to Kaisers' vision for Germany he has the power to change so.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rise of Prussia

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analyze the military, political, and social factors that account for the rise of Prussia between 1640 and 1786.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 1890, Germany was more aggressive. Germany wanted to build up its influence in every part of the world. German foreign policy in these years was best expressed by the term 'Weltpolitik' (World Politics). Because German ambitions were extended to many parts of the globe, Germany came into serious conflicts with all other major powers of Europe (except Austria-Hungary) from 1890 to 1914. Bismarck used wars to cause national unity within Germany but these nationalistic feelings soon disappeared once the country was actually unified. There were several different types of people located in Germany, all of them containing different views on the how the Empire should be ruled. Bismarck was a part of the Junkers or upper class, who supported militarism, and didn't like universal suffrage because it was a threat on their way of life. On the other hand, Southern German states embraced a liberal constitution, and a movement towards democracy grew in this region. Politics were not the only difference; religion broke down nationalism as well. Catholics who lived in the Empire…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther - a History

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of these crises that people faced was a decentralized political state. Germany at this time was a group of collective, independent territories under one elected emperor. Each of these territories denied the emperor the ability to rule with authority. Instead, they had their own rulers, such as nobility or members of the clergy. Due to this strain of power, the emperor was unable to maintain a mandate of sorts against Luther and his ‘heretical’ ideas, like the English rulers did against Wyclif.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays