Intelligent Design Research Paper
Intelligent Design
Albert Einstein once stated,”Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe—a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. The scientists’ religious feeling takes form of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.”
The point Mr. Einstein is trying to make is that most serious scientist have looked into the topic of intelligent design and have come to the conclusion that there is an Intelligent Designer. …show more content…
Everything in our galaxy was placed “just right” so that life could be sustainable. What if the earth was a closer or further to or from the sun? Life could no longer exist due to the fact we would all die from radiation and extraneous heat or get hypothermia and freeze to death. What if the percentage of oxygen was more or less? If the percentage of oxygen was more, sure, paper airplanes might be suspended in the air a little longer, we might be more alert, or we might get sick less often but, we would die younger due to the quickening of the aging process though Oxidative Stress, be much more flammable, and there would be humongous bugs. Earth is a masterpiece of precision and design that could not have come into existence by chance. The intricacy of life is so complex, evolution is absolutely out of the question. The eye, for example is one of the more complex things in your body. Darwin stated that, “To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree possible.” Why has man not made a robotic eye to aid the blind? The answer is simply because the eye is beyond human comprehension. If the eye is past fallible apprehension, what in the body do scientists know or understand in depth? DNA is another thing that scientist are still learning about and it was the
Albert Einstein once stated,”Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe—a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. The scientists’ religious feeling takes form of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.”
The point Mr. Einstein is trying to make is that most serious scientist have looked into the topic of intelligent design and have come to the conclusion that there is an Intelligent Designer. …show more content…
Everything in our galaxy was placed “just right” so that life could be sustainable. What if the earth was a closer or further to or from the sun? Life could no longer exist due to the fact we would all die from radiation and extraneous heat or get hypothermia and freeze to death. What if the percentage of oxygen was more or less? If the percentage of oxygen was more, sure, paper airplanes might be suspended in the air a little longer, we might be more alert, or we might get sick less often but, we would die younger due to the quickening of the aging process though Oxidative Stress, be much more flammable, and there would be humongous bugs. Earth is a masterpiece of precision and design that could not have come into existence by chance. The intricacy of life is so complex, evolution is absolutely out of the question. The eye, for example is one of the more complex things in your body. Darwin stated that, “To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree possible.” Why has man not made a robotic eye to aid the blind? The answer is simply because the eye is beyond human comprehension. If the eye is past fallible apprehension, what in the body do scientists know or understand in depth? DNA is another thing that scientist are still learning about and it was the