Preview

Einstein Vs Phyllis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
727 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Einstein Vs Phyllis
Sixth graders, generally curious people, learn about so many new things and attempt to make sense of it all. They may notice the overlap of religion and science and have many questions pertaining to these two areas. Phyllis noticed this and began to question how faith and science go together, or if they do at all. Particularly, she was curious if scientists pray, and if so, what for. In order to attempt to find an answer for Phyllis, Einstein shared some of his past experiences and knowledge, along with his own view on the situation. Einstein answered her in a letter by telling her scientists don’t pray but instead believe in the laws of nature based on a sort of faith.
Einstein approached answering the broad question by using his personal opinion. He said, “Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this
…show more content…
When they tie in facts, or even religious views that provide emotions, to back up what they discover, it provides them a feeling of fulfilment. Scientists differ on whether they credit these feelings to faith or facts. “The pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling which is different for scientists than the religiosity of someone more naive.” Many scientists believe they don’t have faith because they have studied science and discovered the meaning behind things in a more technical way.
Einstein appealed to logos by bringing up some valid points, such as how science has proven theories that people turn to faith to answer. As an intelligent man, this helps Einstein's argument. He not only expresses his knowledge, but also takes into account his audience. Given that the letter was written to a sixth grader, Einstein tried to give her a more simplified answer so she would understand his response without getting too detailed. He executed this through his use of simple

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Einstein’s tone is distinctly indifferent; exposed in his lack of specifically stating his personal views. His tone, being a strategic method to appeal, and his recognition of all the logical approaches to prayer, being his logos appeal, go hand-in-hand. While he refrains from focusing on himself, he addresses a research scientist as more of a group rather than a specific individual. Einstein logical approaches the idea of scientist and praying: “Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the actions of people.”…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein, one of the greatest scientists of the twentieth century, received a letter from Phyllis Wright in 1936. In this letter, Phyllis asks Einstein whether or not scientists pray. In his response, Einstein's purpose was not only to answer Phyllis' question, but he wanted to express to the public that everyone has a belief in the unknown, whether it be religion or scientific knowledge. Einstein uses words which mirror those used in religion and a neutral diction, and he structures his letter in a way that makes the reader have to think about the answer for themselves in order to achieve his purpose effectively…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Albert Einstein wrote in a letter in 1915 about the most common ways a scientist makes mistakes. These were that they created a false hypothesis or that their arguments are invalid or not logical. Many people agreed with this and many also disagreed, arguing that every science makes mistakes and that Einstein himself made these same mistakes on multiple…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein considered the greatest scientist of the 20th century hopes to accurately respond to Phyllis’s letter that asked him whether scientists prayed and if they did what did they pray about. Einstein’s response is rhetorically accurate in the fact that he lets Phyllis know the answer to her question in an understandable manner and is not abrupt. Einstein’s audience is a sixth-grade student so he answered his question by saying “no” in a kind way. The writer Einstein uses pathos and logos to allow his point to clearly shine; he also uses simplistic diction to recreate his audiences understanding.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a response to sixth-grader Phyllis Wright’s inquiry about prayers in scientists’ lives, Albert Einstein employs rhetorical appeals to character and reason in order to encourage thought from her but ultimately answers her question insufficiently. Since it is already understood that Einstein is the writer, he does not need to establish his credibility. However, he does take advantage his reputation to make broad, encompassing statements about scientists that few others could. For example, an amateur scientist would only be able to represent himself, but Einstein can accurately portray the scientific community by using first person pronouns like “our” and “we” and making generalizing statements about “everyone who is involved in science.” Not…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine life as we know it without science. This may be hard to do, considering that scientific technology is now a perpetual symbol of modern-day life. Everything we see, everything we touch, and everything we ingest—all conceived of scientific research. But how did it come to be this way? Was it not only centuries ago that science began to surpass the authority of the church? Between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, natural philosophers, now known as scientists, founded a new world view on science, which was previously based on the Bible and classic philosophers like Aristotle and Ptolemy. Both people connected their natural studies directly to God and the Bible, creating ideas like a geocentric earth. With time and new ideas, scientists managed to develope methods for creating and discovering things in nature, and with enough resources and patronage, were able to answer asked and unasked questions. Science, however, was not supported by everyone, and had to face many challenges to achieve the power it maintains in today’s world. Due to the strong authority that politics, religion, and common social order controlled in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, science was subjectively held in the hands of those who could utilize it or reject it.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As scientists, or natural philosophers, made new discoveries and theories they often dedicated them to the church, whether it was literal dedication or whether the finding supported the church. Even though they meant to support the church, many of those who did not understand the findings rejected them, but the fact that the common man could not always understand what an astronomer had investigated does not mean that it should be rejected. For the beauty and usefulness of the discoveries support what the common man knows and understands which is that God is God. (Doc. 2) The pressure that came from being rejected pushed scientists to search for acceptance in many cases for fear of being outcast, and there was no greater place to search for acceptance than from the church. Nicolaus Copernicus, Polish priest and astronomer, dedicated his works to Pope Paul III stating how he was not one to shrink from another’s criticism and that his findings contribute to the well being of the Church. (Doc. 1) Copernicus was a man of the church as well, making his words to the Pope weighted, however. Natural philosophers used the church as evidence in their findings as well. Once atoms and the structure of the world were discovered, it was too mind-blowing to not believe that all this perfect complexity was not brought together by an all-powerful being. But seeing that most men during this time were in some way affiliated with the church, it was very common for men to make these sorts of assumptions. (Doc. 8) Religion thus gave scientists a reason for discovery and evidence supporting discoveries.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a letter that Albert Einstein writes, he uses ethos and logos to effectively answer Phyllis Wright’s question on whether scientists pray. In order to achieve this, Einstein first utilizes ethos to give credibility to the answer. He explicitly states that the response is his own opinion by saying “my answer” in the first sentence. This man is considered to be the greatest scientist of the twentieth century and if it is his answer, Wright will be convinced with his response. Also, Wright specifically wrote to him and so when he responds personally, Wright will trust the response because she respects Einstein enough to write to him. Additionally, Einstein successfully employs logos to assist in his purpose to answer the question. For example,…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The subject, speaker, audience relationship is of great importance in any substantial piece of rhetorical writing. Einstein had a tremendous task of displaying his scientific importance yet come across clearly to a sixth grade student. At the beginning of the letter he states that he will answer Phyllis’ question “as simply” as he could. He even made it clear when the answer was going to be stated by saying “Here is my answer.” If Einstein was writing this letter to an English major, he wouldn’t have made the wording as clear and would have made it harder to grasp the main points in the writing. He did a fine job making the subject comprehensible to a sixth grader.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The subject of this letter is about prayer and whether or not scientist pray. He did stay on topic with his subject matter, but…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric and Einstein

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of Einstein’s letter to Phyllis Wright, or the point he’s trying to get across, is done beautifully as he explains at the end of the letter, “In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is indeed quite different from the religiosity of someone more naïve” (Einstein 10). Of course, for the occasion of his letter, his context is well put with many examples and explanations within it. Einstein effectively includes logos, or clearly exemplified reasons, pathos, or the emotion behind the answer, and ethos, the way he answered Phyllis’s question, rather the tone he used.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein 6

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Einstein uses the appeals of ethos, logos and pathos to connect feels with his answer. In his use of ethos, Einstein puts at the end, “I hope this answers your question,” showing that he cares about the question, showing he perhaps, is trying to appeal to Phyllis’s situation. Clear rationality on Einstein’s part shows use of logos. For example, Einstein writes, “All the same this faith has been largely justified so by the success of scientific research,” suggesting that there is a link that can be explain or that they’re simply the same thing. Pathos are throughout Einstein’s letter, such as, supernatural, faith, and superior, these are positive connotations, giving the letter just the right emotion on the audiences behalf. Einstein knew how to use appeal in his letters.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Einstein

    • 2949 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Einstein name is infamous within any group of people; from children to venerated and esteemed scientists. Even decades after his death, his name emits intelligence and an aura of mystery. Albert Einstein was the most prominent physicist or engineer on the planet. Einstein’s legacy still touches our lives daily, both in sense and in our thinking and learning. Einstein was husband twice, a father of three and a lover many times over. But the thing he was best known for was his mind and his thoughts. He was an innovator, unique, persuasive and relentless in the pursuit of knowledge and truth. But was he an entrepreneur? Can his work be classified as business? Can we, as historians, broaden or narrow the scope of the definition of an entrepreneur to meet our specific case by case basis. The answer is an over-whelming yes. When one hears the word entrepreneur, money and business comes to mind. But the scope of the word is so much more expansive than we usually attribute to it. An entrepreneur can is any person who organizes or manages any enterprise, especially a business, usually with considerable initiative and risk; or an employer of productive labor or contractor.1 Looking closely at this definition, Einstein fits the definition of an entrepreneur. Einstein’s contribution to the world might not be one of money, but to some it could be considered so much more valuable. Einstein’s work was full of initiative and overflowing with strife, failure and risk. Einstein’s intellectual properties were in proxy of his monetary successes. Einstein’s childhood was filled with school where he obviously excelled at mathematics at a young age, while at the same time failing in the liberal arts. Albert Einstein published several works that changed the entire field of physics, engineering and completely created the theory of relativity, the idea that non-physical things such as light can be…

    • 2949 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people including some scientist don’t believe in god just because they think it’s superstitious or something that doesn’t exist. Our ancestors are also scientists in some ways. The people in very olden days used to accurately measure the time without having watch, people used to accurately predict the occurrence of lunar and solar eclipse without the facility which nowadays we have.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays