I believe the Insanity Defense Reform, made it more difficult for the defense to prove the insanity defense. Also with limiting conclusive opinionated “expert testimony” by so called experts in the field on mental disabilities. Without the expert witness in the Hinckley trial giving his opinion as to the insanity defense, jurors would not get conclusive or opinionated statements as evidence of the case. Now, is I were to use a hand writing expert that can produce hand writing samples and demonstrate to a court room that with his training and experience in the handwriting field he can match a particular writing sample to another, then that would be an expert testimony with proven facts that are not
I believe the Insanity Defense Reform, made it more difficult for the defense to prove the insanity defense. Also with limiting conclusive opinionated “expert testimony” by so called experts in the field on mental disabilities. Without the expert witness in the Hinckley trial giving his opinion as to the insanity defense, jurors would not get conclusive or opinionated statements as evidence of the case. Now, is I were to use a hand writing expert that can produce hand writing samples and demonstrate to a court room that with his training and experience in the handwriting field he can match a particular writing sample to another, then that would be an expert testimony with proven facts that are not