Preview

Summary: The Civil Right To Illea 'Insane'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1103 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: The Civil Right To Illea 'Insane'
The Civil Right to plea ‘Insane'
What are the legal standards of incompetence when it comes to a trial? How mentally ill does an individual have to be to be given the ‘by reason of insanity' verdict? Frontline's documentary special, A Crime of Insanity, explores the diverging opinions of what truly constitutes a defendant's mental illness, as well as their competency of withstanding a trial. Ralph Tortorici, a mentally unstable 26-year-old, walked onto State University of New York campus along with a high-powered rifle concealed under his clothes. Tortorici seized a class seminar hostage, exclaiming that he had a computer chip implanted within his head and penis, and demanded that he speak with the President. Shortly after, the police and SWAT
…show more content…
However, to no avail, Tortorici refused to reach an agreement and remained barricaded within the classroom. Due to the failing negotiation pleads, a young student within the classroom rushed Tortorici and wrestled away the rifle, thus, making it go off. During the scuffle, the young student who charged Tortorici was seriously injured, and because of the thundering gunshots echoing the halls, the SWAT team stormed the room. As Ralph Tortorici was apprehended by the police, he began spastically shouting out to the crowds that now lined the campus about a conspiracy theory and a ‘government experiment.' Tortorici was sent to the Albany County prison where he was charged with fourteen counts of kidnapping, aggravated assault, and even attempted murder. After the charges were enforced, Tortorici's lawyer presented a plea of ‘not guilty by reason of insanity.' If successful, the defense's plea of NGBRI may determine if Ralph Tortorici will either be committed to the psychiatric facility in hopes of receiving long-term aid or thrown away into a …show more content…
He explained that his brother was ‘straight-edge' up until the age of fifteen; that sports were the one thing that Ralph truly had an engrossed passion for. By the time Ralph Tortorici reached high school, his whole demeanor and outlook on the outside world around him drastically changed. Serious delusions began to bombard Tortorici and began to hinder his ability to live a functional and stable life. "Psychological dysfunctioning of an individual does not occur in isolation but is influenced by societal and social factors (Comer, 2016, p. 527)." Tortorici began to suspect that the police were following him and accused his family of being behind the conspiracy. He believed that there were bugs planted within the family's TV set, inside the lamps, and inside his facial razor. In addition, Tortorici was born with a malfunctioning urethra and had to go through a series of evasive surgical procedures to correct it. Thus, he believed that the government invaded his body and implanted a tracking device within his penis. The degree of Tortorici's mental instability was apparent, and his ability to coherently stand trial was the leading issue of the case. Clinicians in a courtroom setting are there to help assess the psychological incompetency that some individual presents when they are accused of a crime. In some cases, the court

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One week before the murder he was arrested for a violent behavior at one of the hospitals. With just a slap on the hand, he was released into the community to go on to kill Kathryn Faughey just the next week. David Tarloff has been evaluated and committed more then a dozen times in his life time. Over the years he has been put on many of drugs to treat schizophrenic and bipolar such as lithium, Depakota, Haldol, Seroquel and Zyprexa and along with that, shock treatments have been given. After months of being in state hospitals and psychiatric reports, it has been determined that David Tarloff is unfit to stand trial. After being found fit to stand trial in one county in Queens, New York another county in Manhtatten says he is not fit to stand trial. Tarloff is now back at Rikers Island, where his attorney says he is not taking his medication all the time and has been suicidal in the last couple of months. The psychopath is unable to feel sorry for others in unfortunate situations or put himself in another’s place, whether or not they have been harmed by him. “They are all very egocentric individuals with no empathy for others, and they are incapable of feeling remorse or guilt” (The Psychopath:Rebecca Horton,…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dusky Case Summary

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    US the Supreme Court established guidelines that satisfy due process in regards to one’s competency to stand trial. The Supreme Court determined that the court must find the defendant able to rationally, and functionally understand the charges and proceedings against them, and have a present ability to assist their attorney in their defense. It is not merely enough for one to be oriented as to person, place, and time. This standard goes on to define both the cognitive and interpersonal aspects of competency to stand trial . The cognitive element is the ability to know and understand the charges and legal process being taken. The interpersonal element is in regards to the ability of the client to assist their attorney. Moreover, the Dusky standard confirms that under Higgins v. McGrath (1951), a defendant who suffers from a severe mental mental disorder may still be competent to stand trial if the defendant can understand and assist their attorney. Furthermore, because of these new guidelines, Dusky was retried and received a guilty verdict however, his sentencing was reduced by more than half. He was sentenced to 20 years with eligibility for parole in 5 years in comparison to serving the original sentence of 45…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mr. Bumble is a 37-year-old, orange, single male who was referred to Maddox and Associates to determine if the defendant is legally incompetent to stand trial as defined by Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 4241. Mr. Bumble has been held at the State Penitentiary since April 3, 1091 for the allege murder of a state police ranger which is a violation of Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 1111 and 1114. Mr. Bumble reports having three prior hospitalizations to stabilize his mental status, in addition to diagnosis of Brief Reactive Psychosis, Antisocial Personality Traits, Borderline Personality Disorder, and Chronic Undifferentiated Schizophrenia. His current diagnosis is Schizophrenia, Paranoid Type, Chronic; personality disorders have been deferred,…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ralph Tortoric Case Essay

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    *Emily A. Singleton-Burruano* 1 Hands On: Crime and Punishment of a Delusional Emily A. Singleton-Burruano Kaplan University CJ100 Professor Campbell April 20, 2009 KU CJ100 *Emily A. Singleton-Burruano* 2 In the case of Ralph Tortoric I found it hard to determine where I stood from the article in the Kaplan library alone. After extensive internet research I came to the conclusion that I do agree with the judge’s ruling. When Judge Rosen ordered the first competency evaluation Tortoriciwas declared incompetent to stand trial, meaning he was unable to understand the nature of the charges against him. Upon this finding, Tortorici was sent to a secure mental health facility where he spent several months. Eventually, the psychiatrists…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In SELL v. UNITED STATES, the question was whether the constitution allows forcibly medicating a mentally ill defendant so that he/she can be competent for trial for serious crimes that are non-violent. The constitution does allow this but under certain circumstances. Sell was found to be mentally incompetent to stand trial after examination by a magistrate the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners. Sell decided to challenge the decision made by the Medical center to force the medication on him. Because he was a danger to himself and others, the magistrate gave the go ahead on forcing him to take the medication. This would most likely the best way to bring him back to competency to stand trial…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is not covered as its own constitutional right, although it faults under the due process clause in the 5th and 14th amendments. The states define their own elements for what constitutes insanity, using the common law as a guideline. Mens rea—Latin for the “guilty mind” — is one of the necessary elements for insanity. If found incompetent, the person is usually charged to…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two cases with defendants who both have plead not guilty by reason of insanity, have been given two different rulings despite the fact that they both have mental illnesses. In James Holmes’ trial, Holmes killed twelve people and injured more than seventy in his local movie theater. Holmes was found not guilty by reason of insanity, but a psychiatrist claimed him to be legally sane, but had a mental illness.(Ingold and Phillips) If Holmes was ‘legally sane’ but mentally ill then he should not have been found not guilty by reason of INSANITY. In the Eddie Routh case, he was given a life sentence and had suffered severe PTSD and schizophrenia prior to the crime. (Banner) According to the Model Penal Code would not Routh's mental illness be the cause of his crime and excuse him from the sentence? The court is acting unjust, inconsistent, and illogical in their rulings to these defendants who both have records of mental illness, or claims of mental illness, but one walks into the prison at the end of the day and the other walks into the mental ward. The rules currently in action allow judges to rule based on what seems to be their unlogical personal opinion after maybe reviewing the mental illness records, maybe not, their pigheaded personality will…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The chapter introduction tells the story of a schoolgirl and a teacher to make the point that…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, Vetter (1990) studied the association of the intensity of the violence within the crime, with the reactions and assessment that humans provide for the motive of the crime. He states that, “ To many, a person who commits a series of heinous, apparently senseless, murders must be ‘out of his mind.’ The exact nature of the ‘mental illness’ is not especially important, but the more bizarre the murders, the more convincing is the self-evident proposition that they are the work of someone who is ‘mad’.” Vetter goes on to say that criminal law associates with incompetence and insanity. He states that it does not connect with mental illness. (1990) According to criminal law, when the courts find a person mentally insane, they are almost automatically found not guilty by reason of insanity. Vetter’s studies help categorize the serial murders to allow criminologists to better analyze the reasoning behind the crimes.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The right to freedom of speech came under scrutiny in the case of John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al. versus Free Speech Coalition, et al. in 2002. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's judgment against the plaintiff’s broader definition of pornography in enacting the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996. This broader definition, the court finds it in contravention with the First Amendment. The Ninth Circuit reasoned that the definition of banning any depiction of pornographic materials, including films that Congress adds on the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 was overboard and as such violated the First Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote: "First Amendment freedoms are most in danger…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On December 15th, 1971, the first X amendments to the Constitution went into affect. The first X amendments to the constitution were known as the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment was written by James Madison because the American people were demanding a guarantee of their freedom. The First Amendment was put into place to protect American’s freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly and freedom of petition. The First Amendment was written as follows;…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mental illness is defined as “Any of various conditions characterized by impairment of an individual’s normal cognitive, emotional, or behavioral functioning, and caused by social, psychological, biochemical, genetic, or other factors, such as infection or head trauma” (thefreedictionary.com). A defendant charged with a crime may present the court with an insanity plea. Upon application of the insanity plea, the defendant must be psychologically evaluated. A common test that is used for this evaluation is called the M’Naghten rules. These rules state that “it must be clearly proved that at the time of committing the act the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or as not to know that what he was doing was wrong” (bailii.org). In using this defence the accused may receive a verdict of “guilty but mentally ill,” which means the accused party may still receive the death penalty. It is extremely rare that an individual using the insanity plea defence gets acquitted.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays