Preview

Indeterminate Sentencing System

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1412 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indeterminate Sentencing System
Punishment in the United States Corrections System
Francisco Martinez
CJA/234
November 7, 2014
Yolonda Johnson
Punishment in the United States Corrections System
Punishment in the United States is always evolving, always changing to meet the different demands of our society. A unique aspect of our society is that we, as members of society, deem what is socially acceptable and what the punishment should be for those who violate our rules. In this paper, we will be discussing the different objectives of punishment at the state and federal level. We will also explain how sentencing affects the state and federal corrections systems overall. Lastly, we will define determinate sentencing, indeterminate sentencing and which sentencing model
…show more content…
Determinate sentencing is "a jail or prison sentence that is definite and not subject to review by a parole board or other agency. For example, a sentence of six months in the county jail is determinate, because the prisoner will spend no more than six months (minus time off for good behavior, in some situations). By contrast, an indeterminate sentence (such as 20 years to life) has a minimum term but the release date, if any, will be chosen by a parole board as it periodically reviews the case” (Legal Information Institute, N/A). On a personal level, I agree more with a determinate sentencing model rather than an indeterminate sentencing model. I choose this because the types of crimes do not change why do the sentencing models? Homicide is still homicide no matter if the offender has committed this crime ten times or just once. I believe this is a greater deterrent to future crimes when our society imposes strict punishments for crimes committed. I lean more to determinate sentencing because as a correctional officer I have seen firsthand how inmates skirt the system and essentially get away with very little time instead of receiving harsher sentences. This is simply not satisfactory to me, and I do not agree with indeterminate …show more content…
In this paper, we have defined state and federal objectives of punishment. We have also discussed the overall effects sentencing has on the corrections system. Lastly, we have defined determinate and indeterminate sentencing and which model I prefer. Our corrections system is under constant strain and always evolving. We as a society are losing the battle against the criminal element within our ranks. We glamorize crime, and our young generation is manipulated to believe this is the norm. We need to take back our communities and begin to change this trend, or we will lose our communities

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this paper the topics that will be discussed will be what are the state and federal objectives of punishment? How does sentencing affect the state and federal corrections systems overall? With support for that answer, what is the determinate and indeterminate sentencing? As well as which sentencing model that is felt the most appropriate? With an explanation as to why and examples will be provided.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following paragraphs will define and explain the differences between determinate and indeterminate sentences. This discussion may seem, at first blush, to be somewhat theoretical. However, the issue is a life-altering one for parole as an institution. In a determinate sentencing structure, there is no role for a paroling authority in making release decisions.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Mackenzie, Doris L. (2000). Sentencing and Corrections in the 21st Century: Setting the Stage For The Future. Retrieved October 25, 2002 from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/international/sentence.doc.…

    • 5792 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most dramatic developments in the Criminal Justice system during the late 20th Century were the revolution of the sentencing system. Prior to the sentencing reforms of 1984, most of the 20th century federal sentencing was largely based on rehabilitative model where sentencing was indeterminate. By the 1970s, the traditional sentencing system came under increasing attack as public interest in the criminal justice system prompted “crime research boom time” (Nagel, 1990; Wilkins, 1987). The concerns manifested to a policy reform focusing on retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as means of getting tough on crime and.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Punishment may sound like painful word, but in fact it is nothing more but a consequence given to a criminal offender. The state and federal correction system have similar objectives for criminal offenders as a form of punishment. Due to request for harsher punishment, sentencing affects both the state and federal correction system. Upon pleading or finding an offender guilty, the determinate and indeterminate sentencing model is implied in which the federal and state correctional system assigns to criminals for time given in prison.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the 19th century, America made changes to it’s sentencing model and implemented “indeterminate sentences” (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). Based on state statute, judges determine a minimum and maximum amount of time to be served and a parole board is tasked with granting release (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). This particular sentencing model grants discretion to many entities in determining the length of time served (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). Many felt this method was not effective and allowed the punishment to be disproportionate to the crime, which sparked the determinate sentencing model (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.).…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To address the question as to what style of sentencing guidelines I would prefer to be used within my state, I would have to sway towards indeterminate sentencing. The end goal is to rehabilitate those who enter the prison system for crimes they have committed. For most, they will eventually reenter society after completing their respective prison sentence. The hope is that those incarcerated have completed rehabilitative programs and can now be productive members of society. We as a society need to understand that law enforcement simply can’t arrest their way out of all the crimes committed on a daily basis. Additionally, each person’s situation should be examined separately. This includes examining the crime committed, the person’s criminal…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the cons of the determinate sentencing is that if a criminal is sentenced in that area then the prisoner will serve six months in jail or prison and according to Janet Portman the author of Indeterminate Vs Determinate Prison Sentences Explained she stated that “determinate sentencing has a defined length of time that the prisoner has to serve for more than six months out of a year and that sentencing model is reserved for felonies and violent offenders and that person won’t be able to get parole due to defined time and what that means it cannot be changed by any agency including the parole board under any circumstances regardless.”…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the process of knowing whether or not sentencing laws deter crime, that fact in the United States (U.S.), in the last 20 years, shows that longer sentences do not deter crime. After years of increased sentences and drain on the state’s treasury, we need to acknowledge this fact. In New York and many other states, the “tough” policies have produced a combination of large-scale prison overcrowding without meaningful reductions in our crime rate.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With a determinate sentence the convicted person is given a sentence that has a defined length to be served and cant’ be changed by a parole board or any other agency but may reduced by factors such as “good time”. While with an indeterminate sentence it consists of a range of the years that will be served. There is always a minimum sentence but the release date if any is uncertain. It is determined by a parole board when it periodically reviews the case, and could be given the possibility for parole. The problems that criminals with mental health problems face with determinate sentencing are the parole chance. The fact that there is no chance of parole with determinate sentencing makes it hard for the individual to get treatment for his or her disorder. Being in prison is a harsh place and with the fact that a individual with mental health problems is put into a penitentiary without getting help just add fuel to the fire making it harder and harder for them to recover. Also there is no probation given because they are sent straight to jail or prison were they are told to serve an exact time, which then leads to no chance of actual treatment for the individual. With prevention being one of the main goals of determinate sentencing it also leads to a chance of greater occurrence after the individual being released. Yes they are preventing crimes from happening while the criminal is incarcerated but what about when he’s released? He still has the same mental problems as before if they haven’t increased. They are given little to no treatment to help their mental problems therefore increasing the possibility of reoccurrence later. I believe that if a criminal with mental health issues is being served with a determinate sentence that he or she should first spend a set amount of time in a mental hospital until progress has been made and been noted as being safe to serve out the rest of his sentence in a prison or…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parole boards decided on release dates. The principle behind indeterminate sentences is the hope that prisons reconstruct some offenders, and that different people give feedback very differently to punishment. Prison officials usually like indeterminate sentencing because the prospect of earlier release gives prisoners the motivation to behave while locked behind bars. The argument with intermediate is according to many people, is that it puts too much influence into the hands of the parole board, leading to irrational and unjust results.for those who may not know parole means that the offender is allowed to serve the rest of her sentence under community watch. The offender is discharged from prison to be a part of the community, but not without some rules being involved. At a minimum, the offender will be required to check in regularly, with her parole officer. Any violation, like an arrest for a new crime or a failure to find and keep a job, can result in the person being sent back to prison also. Essentially meaning that minorities and etc get treated differently or more harshly than other races. While people who deserve a harsher sentence are…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many offenders in the prison system are diverted to different alternative outcomes in the sentencing process. The different alternatives are a newer approach than what it used to be before World War 2. The sentencing process is the post-conviction stage of the criminal justice process, in which the defendant is brought before the court for the imposition of a penalty. If a defendant is convicted in a criminal prosecution, the event that follows the verdict is called sentencing. A sentence is the penalty ordered by the court (“Sentencing,” n.d.).…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prison Overcrowding Essay

    • 1773 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States incarceration rate has steadily increased due to enforcement of nationwide drug laws and tougher sentencing procedures. The great debate over prison overcrowding has lead to someone either being a supporter of tough sentencing, or an opponent. Supporters of tough sentencing believe that harsh punishment will discourage people from wanting to commit these crimes, meanwhile keeping our streets safer. They say more prisons should be…

    • 1773 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Each year in America many people received prison sentences for crimes that pose little if any danger or harm to our society. Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in the American Justice System has long been argued by both Lawmakers and the public. We will go over some of the history of mandatory minimum sentences as well as the many pros and cons to these types of sentences. Some examples of pros and cons are the overall effect on public safety, the effect on the offenders, the cost to taxpayers, the lack of discretion for Judge’s, and whether the law should be repealed.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laws and policies are written in different aspects of the criminal justice system. Some of these policies are written within the federal government and some are written on a smaller scale in the state government. The two seem rather simple to understand on the surface. The federal government handles the entire United States whereas the state government handles just what it says and that is within that specific state, such as New Jersey (N.J.). The following paper will contain information which will compare and contrast the policies written from both types of governments and how they relate to the criminal justice system. There will be information on how these policies have been developed and how they are implemented. Some explanation will be given as to how offenders are prosecuted and how their level of court is decided upon by the prosecution. The severity of the crime is equal to the severity of the prosecution and then finally the sentencing.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays