Preview

Determinate Sentencing Model

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
841 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Determinate Sentencing Model
Today in our country our justice system runs by two models in order to keep peace and order to the public the first model is the determinate sentencing model what the Determinate model is when the judge is about to pass a sentence on to defendant and to address the problem with crimes that has been going around since the 1980s for example the government of some states in our country passed the three strike laws where when someone commits a crime that is considered serious then they get harsher sentences and to tell people who are more likely to commit the crime to don’t do it and it is not worth it . One of the pros for the determinate sentencing model is that the defendant could be eligible for probation, parole and alternative programs …show more content…
One of the cons of the determinate sentencing is that if a criminal is sentenced in that area then the prisoner will serve six months in jail or prison and according to Janet Portman the author of Indeterminate Vs Determinate Prison Sentences Explained she stated that “determinate sentencing has a defined length of time that the prisoner has to serve for more than six months out of a year and that sentencing model is reserved for felonies and violent offenders and that person won’t be able to get parole due to defined time and what that means it cannot be changed by any agency including the parole board under any circumstances regardless.” …show more content…
According to Nate Balis the director of juvenile’s justice strategy group he stated that “ incarceration of juveniles is not helping the community stop a person to stop committing crime it persuades them to keep doing what they’re doing and don’t care about life at all.” (Balis)
The second finding I found on pretrial justice is that the justice system has problem with inequality one of the statements that caught mine attention Eric Holder one of the attorney generals said that “every local state and federal and also private agency’s need to be reformed in order to have a fair justice system”. (Holder)
The third finding that I found out that the community is having problems with the most is racial justice for example African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to get detained by the police and the reason that they were hold in jail the longest was because they weren’t able to meet the conditions the justice system sets for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing policy in federal courts. In 1980 they reformed the federal sentencing. The intent was to provide determinate sentencing. Determinate sentencing is a fixed period of incarceration without the possibility of parole, but time served can be reduced by accumulating good time. “Coinciding with the development of determinate sentencing has been the development of sentencing guidelines to control and structure the process and make it more rational. Guidelines are usually based on the seriousness of a crime and the background of an offender: The more serious the crime and the more extensive the offender’s criminal background, the longer the prison term recommended by the guidelines.” (Segel & Senna 2006). These guidelines were designed to eliminate judicial discretion and get tough on crime.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper the topics that will be discussed will be what are the state and federal objectives of punishment? How does sentencing affect the state and federal corrections systems overall? With support for that answer, what is the determinate and indeterminate sentencing? As well as which sentencing model that is felt the most appropriate? With an explanation as to why and examples will be provided.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate sentencing can take two forms: legislatively determined or judicially determined. In either case, the offender is sentenced to a specific term of incarceration. He or she is released at the expiration of the term, minus good time credits if they are available. There is no discretionary parole release, although there may be a period of supervision in the community. Under a legislatively determined structure, the legislature fixes by law the penalty for specific offenses or offense categories. In a judicially determined system, the judge has broad discretion to choose a sanction, but, once…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most dramatic developments in the Criminal Justice system during the late 20th Century were the revolution of the sentencing system. Prior to the sentencing reforms of 1984, most of the 20th century federal sentencing was largely based on rehabilitative model where sentencing was indeterminate. By the 1970s, the traditional sentencing system came under increasing attack as public interest in the criminal justice system prompted “crime research boom time” (Nagel, 1990; Wilkins, 1987). The concerns manifested to a policy reform focusing on retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as means of getting tough on crime and.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Punishment may sound like painful word, but in fact it is nothing more but a consequence given to a criminal offender. The state and federal correction system have similar objectives for criminal offenders as a form of punishment. Due to request for harsher punishment, sentencing affects both the state and federal correction system. Upon pleading or finding an offender guilty, the determinate and indeterminate sentencing model is implied in which the federal and state correctional system assigns to criminals for time given in prison.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To address the question as to what style of sentencing guidelines I would prefer to be used within my state, I would have to sway towards indeterminate sentencing. The end goal is to rehabilitate those who enter the prison system for crimes they have committed. For most, they will eventually reenter society after completing their respective prison sentence. The hope is that those incarcerated have completed rehabilitative programs and can now be productive members of society. We as a society need to understand that law enforcement simply can’t arrest their way out of all the crimes committed on a daily basis. Additionally, each person’s situation should be examined separately. This includes examining the crime committed, the person’s criminal…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though incarceration should be about rehabilitating prisoners and releasing them back into society as productive members, unfortunately it has become about politics. Those running for office always want to appear to be tough on crime, and indeterminate sentencing appears to some to be too soft. Allowing prisoners to earn their freedom before they have served their maximum sentence is not punishment in the eyes of those that believe prisoners should be locked up and made to do hard…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moving forward, we examine the rehabilitation view. This view of punishment fails the guilt requirement because the criminal justice system would have to sort out all the potential criminals from society and attempt to rehabilitate them and attempt to make them into a better person, which would be nearly impossible. It also fails the equal treatment requirement because each criminal would require a different form of…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory Sentencing

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page

    In the PowerPoint, you talk about removing mandatory sentences, and for my understanding was if the crimes are committed before the mandatory sentences come in place this can be one of the expectations of not implement the mandatory sentence. The judge can have some discretion to adjust some guideline of sentencing and left the parole to decide if he can be released.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate sentence is use by some states; the judge is who determinate the time that the offender will serve in jail. In this type of sentence, the judge can’t use discretion at the time of sentencing he only apply the law as it is. The period of time that these offenders will spend in jail cannot be change by parole board. In a determinate system, the offender knows when he will be released from jail. The released time is determinate by the judge. Overall, the judge has to review the pre-sentence and who the offender complaint with the court procedure before issue a date for the offender to be released. The determinate sentence is referring as “the sentence is determined”.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Larkin, Jr., 2014). This option will also affect the safety of the public. As stated by Evan Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr. (2014), “locking up offenders also incapacitates them for the term of their imprisonment and thereby protects the public”. In addition, the elimination of “mandatory sentences enable communities to conserve scarce enforcement resources without losing any deterrent benefit” (Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr., 2014).…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Federal government is now doing, all state agencies as well need to continually document and collect statistical data that identifies the race of those individuals processed through the criminal justice system. In the areas of administering justice (police, courts, and prison authorities), we need to pay specific attention to and hold accountable individuals for any instances where racial discrimination exists. As a society, we need to be concerned¡Xand express this concern, at the all-encompassing patterns of racial discrimination. By pressuring our governments to take urgent action to stop racial discrimination in our country¡¦s justice system, perhaps we can begin to prevent or reduce the incidence this practice. By effectively acknowledging that there is a problem in the criminal justice system, we can clearly communicate the expectation that discrimination on the grounds of race or ethnicity is unlawful and a violation of an individual¡¦s…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effective programs’ has positive impacts on juveniles in the criminal justice system. Juvenile offenders attending programs that focus on helping the offenders and “increasing family problem- solving skills, enhancing emotional connections between family members, and strengthening parental ability to provide appropriate structure” (Wilson, 2011, p. 121) have a positive impact on reducing recidivism in the juvenile justice system. Cost outweighs the benefits of effective programs. Ineffective programs such as discipline and deterrence programs have a negative impact on juvenile offenders and increase recidivism rates in juveniles. The cost to send juveniles to ineffective programs does not outweigh the benefits.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophies

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    The factors that go into determining sentencing are broke into three steps. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. A factor that can change incarceration time is that of “good time”, this is when a reduction in time served by a prisoner is based on good behavior and other positive actions. This is said to promote discipline…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays