Preview

Importance Of Civil Disobedience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
466 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Importance Of Civil Disobedience
Malcolm X once said, “You’re not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can’t face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it.” Meaning, unjust laws are unjust, regardless of who is decreeing the laws. The quote brings up a question, is it the duty of citizens to put morals over law? Yes, yes it is. It is an obligation as both citizens and human beings to oppose any oppression enforced upon their fellow citizens.
Before choosing to follow civil disobedience, one must fully understand what it means. Civil disobedience is a form of peaceful political protest. If there hadn’t been any civil disobedience in the world, countess laws and even nations might not exist. America, for example was built off of civil disobedience. The country wouldn’t exist if it didn’t stand up against Britain. If someone hadn’t stood up for women’s rights, women might not have the ability to vote. The list can go on and on. The progress of a nation is dependent on the demands of the people
…show more content…
This assumption could not be more incorrect. Allies are always key parts to a political movement that bridge the two different communities together in the battle. It might also be said that civil disobedience is not necessary for certain laws. This is also wrong. The refusal of oppression in small laws leads to the destruction of laws that enforce a larger oppression. Take Rosa parks as an example. Her decision to stay in her seat ignited the flame of a movement that eventually won equality for African-Americans.
Overall, civil disobedience is very important. As Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was ‘legal’ and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters in Hungary did was ‘illegal.’” It is the moral responsibility of all citizens to peacefully protest against any form of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King, however, didn’t advocate citizens transcending the law, but rather, Dr. King believed that in order to remedy injustice in society, people must openly break the unjust law and accept punishment in showing “highest respect for the law”(King p.23). In a rather interesting yet extreme example, King relates civil disobedience to the Holocaust: “It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. But I am sure that, if I had lived in Germany during that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. If I lived in a communist country today where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I believe I would openly advocate disobeying these anti-religious laws”(King p.23). King cites such an example to bring out the visceral reaction of the audience, given the Holocaust’s widespread negative publicity and condemnation. Thus, King manipulates the reader’s emotions to bring them on board with the idea of civil disobedience. No one would dare question the rectitude of aiding a helpless Jew. King attempts direct the same negative connotation of the Holocaust to segregation in the U.S. to fight injustice in…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without civil disobedience it’s impossible to see where we would be today. The first act of civil disobedience was the Boston Tea Party. On December, 16, 1773 the group Sons of Liberty created a political demonstration against the Tea Act. The Tea Act was an unfair tax used to make us pay for their war. This is one of many times we were treated differently and unfairly than citizens living in Britain. The act of throwing tea into the harbor ignited tension for more people to protest and overthrow the…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This country has a rich history of civil disobedience. In fact, the men who founded our country used civil disobedience to protest against unjust laws that they felt threatened their future and the future of generations to come. Tim DeChristopher used civil disobedience to stop the auction of oil and gas leases being held by the BLM. Mohandas Gandhi used nonviolent resistance against the British who occupied India. While Henry David Thoreau not only used these methods of nonviolent protest, he actually helped to define criteria of what is to be considered civil disobedience.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Revolutionary Era, our country knew that laws were necessary to protect our given rights and freedoms. Laws today still protect those rights, and it is our duty to live by them and defend them. Throughout history, unstable laws have been tested and found either vital for our humanity or detrimental. It is our jobs as citizens to abide by these laws as well as prove the necessity of how they are predicated. Our world is constantly changing in terms of social and political terms. Some may argue that the only way to preserve peace is to ignore worldly change and concur and pursue the government's laws.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should we obey the law? Following the rules is something that is often emphasized from a very young age. However, there are cases when choosing to break the rules is the right thing to do. It is sometimes necessary to disobey the law.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is one way to stabilize communities. Although some have argued the valid point that if you disobey a law whenever you disapprove of it” it can lead to anarchy, with people ignoring laws. In other words, if nobody follows the laws, what's the point of them? The matter of the fact is, everybody doesn’t disobey laws. If you look around today’s society, most people abide by laws and “while many … may be morally justified in disobeying, few ……

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is a key part of the rights that all Americans now have. Civil disobedience allows for the people to take a stand against rules and regulations that they do not agree with. From movements such as ending slavery, women voting, and racial equality, civil disobedience was a major factor in getting the attention of those who had the position to make a change. Rosa Parks wouldn't give up her seat on a bus, which brought national attention to rising concerns of racial equality in the 1950s and 1960s. Martin Luther King Junior held many rallies and marches to make his point well known, and impossible to ignore by the people who had the power to change the laws of the day. From as far back as Harriet Tubman, who helped slaves…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I negate that civil disobedience, or “the refusal to obey certain laws, demands, or commands of a government, or of an occupying international power”, according to the dictionary, should be permissible. The rule of law provides the necessary structure for maintaining justice. Civil Disobedience is not permissible for three reasons: It sabotages democratic process, is self-defeating, and although a part of history, that does not make it morally just. Civil Disobedience is not permissible because it sabotages democratic process. Deliberately breaking the law violates the procedural rules that an operating democracy determines.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tells, "No one will ever convict me for a traitor" (Page 61). In a nonviolent…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How can disobeying ever be civil? Civil disobedience is not and will never be truly peaceful. If you look at some of the cases in history which started out as civil disobedience such as the French Revolution may I remind you of what resulted from that, thousands and thousands of deaths, some of maybe innocent people! Especially in our society, where people tend to turn to violent actions, will civil disobedience ever truly be peaceful? Or will it just be the door way to revolt and chaos. This is the question you must ask yourself while contemplating if it is just or not. All I have to say to you is, what has resulted from your own experiences of disobedience, because if they have resulted in reward than you can get back to me. It is no secret that America is a perfect society, but that should not compel the citizens to respond in civil…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is importance in order, as it is necessary for members of the country to be United States rather than just states. There is beauty in disobedience, as it is necessary to create changes that allow for a shift based on morals. Maybe it's the mentally-developing teenager inside of me talking, but rebellion doesn't come from a place of hate but rather from hope for the future. Although it is simple to place order and chaos on opposite sides of the mental spectrum, both are needed for a cohesive yet transforming country. The history of America has been launched by civil disobedience - defined as nonviolent actions against injustice. As Americans we can choose to stay stagnant, or reach to create a greater future for the upcoming generations. Civil disobedience isn't a selfish act, but a movement for the posterity of our country.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History will reveal the major part civil disobedience has played on overcoming governmental injustices. Today, people know Gandhi’s Salt March to Martin Luther King’s demonstrations. Gandhi’s actions helped gain India’s its independence and King’s tactics were instrumental in winning rights for black people in the United States. Others situations include the successful protest of 1998 rioters in Indonesia against the despotic system of government under the Suharto regime.[3] In the US during the early 1900s strikes organized by mistreated workers led to the introduction of labor unions, end of child labor and improved job benefits.[4] Those in the opposite mindset believe that civil disobedience is counter-productive and that the court system should combat unjust laws. However what all these causes listed above has in common was that, “there was no other avenue open to redress grievances” making civil obedience the only way to protest…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil disobedience to me means a group or an individuals protesting or blocking a civil action against the government. To me I personally been in a situation where I was involved in a dispute. At the time I was attending Harris Stowe State University and the university was celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King Jr like they do for the past 15 years and during the time of the ceremony it was the whole issue of the Michael Brown case. So there were angry protestors that marched on campus grounds as well as me and a group of students were coming back from community service project and the angry protestors were inside the Henry Givens Auditorium as well as Mike Brown mother. The angry protestors had interrupted the program and got kicked outside of the auditorium, so they continued to stand outside with the other protestors from the MLK march and the angry group started to yell and tell me and the rest of the…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carl Cohen writes "Persons who engage in civil disobedience deliberately flout the law; They make light of it in a way the cannot be justified in a law governing community." I strongly disagree with this argument. Yes, one does "deliberately flout the law" when committing a civil disobedience act but it is a way to protest for ones believes. The government would not listen to its people with just a letter asking to change a law. They need to be informed with an act. Carl Cohen also writes "Civil disobedience Supposes the primacy of selfishness interests" and he argues that every act of civil disobedience is immoral and is against what society needs. He says that only certain people benefit the act of the certain civil disobedience. I do not agree with this statement because as mentioned before, Rosa Park, did not only help herself but the rest of the African Americans community. Alice Paul did not only help herself but the rest of the woman population who was not being…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust Laws

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Singer gives two typical arguments in favor of obeying these unjust laws. I will address these arguments one at a time. The first argument says that, "By disobeying [a law] I set an example for others that may lead them to disobey too. The effect may multiply and contribute to a decline in law and order. In an extreme case, it may lead to civil war." (Singer, 297)…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays