“If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” (Henry Thoreau) This famous quote is taken from the famous essay Civil Disobedience written in 1848, Civil Disobedience still stands as an expression of moral and individual conscience against a un just government. To begin, the quote written by Henry Thoreau, “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” is essentially saying If following the law results in a wrong done to another person, then do not follow the law, and that morals from human to human come before government rules or laws resulting in disobedience.…
Government vs. Conscience – it is a common and frequent dilemma individuals face in their everyday lives. Some say that civil disobedience – to a degree – is justified, however, to countless others, that is an impractical and far-fetched idea. Kim Davis – a Kentucky clerk who spent four days in jail for refusing to put her name on same-sex marriage licenses – is one such individual who strongly believes that civil disobedience is undeniably justified and ought to be implemented “when a government [or law] compels [the individual] to sin or prevents [the individual] from doing something God commands [them] to do” (Turek). On the other hand, Judge David Bunning stated, “The court cannot condone the willful disobedience of its lawfully issued…
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it is exercising the rights of it’s citizens as well as proving that the government is not always correct, and the biggest changes normally come about from civil disobedience. Civil disobedience has been used to speak against the United States government when it showed that those in power wouldn’t change for the better. Civil disobedience was not well known for the abolition of slaves. David Thoreau called for it in “Civil Disobedience,” written in 1849, claiming that the government showed faulty in handling slavery. Thoreau claimed “the government itself… is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it,” (Thoreau par 1).…
To sum things briefly, the exercise of civil disobedience is not only a positive impact on a free society; it is the very ideology that a free society is founded upon. Without support for disobedience, a government breaks the agreement that it represents. By this reasoning, without the right to peacefully oppose a law while also accepting the consequences, a society cannot truly identify as…
In the 19th century a revolutionary concept was introduced to the world: civil disobedience. It was the concept that people could disobey laws and accept their consequences to protest in peace. It may sound counter-intuitive, but it drew attention to some of the greatest plights in human history: civil rights for African Americans, Indian oppression by the British Empire, South African apartheid, among many other events. Each of them succeeded in changing the world by fighting with their words, their wills, and their intellect. Civil disobedience allows people to bring their voices to democracy when they feel that there is injustice, even at the cost of illegalities and anarchy.…
Throughout history, civil disobedience has been the mainstay of ordinary people protesting against the government and unethical laws. Civil disobedience is a peaceful form of protest, without any violence or breaking any government law. People like Gandhi, Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. showed the public eye that it was possible to get your point across without any acts of violence. Sit-downs, marches and hunger strikes were used as a peaceful, but powerful form of getting your point across to the government and American people. I believe that civil disobedience is an effective mode of persuasion.…
Civil disobedience is the act of disobeying the law but in a peaceful manner while accepting the consequences. Many people feel it is wrong and disruptive; however, it is what makes people free and true to themselves and what they believe in. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it is truly giving the people their freedom. It does not harm anyone, since it’s only done to prove one’s point or to let them stand up for what they believe is right.…
Woman's suffrage was made possible with the use of civil disobedience. Segregation laws were abolished with the use of civil disobedience. Same- sex marriage was accomplished with the use of civil disobedience. All these examples make up one answer; Civil disobedience does positively impact a free society.…
The philosophy and tactics of civil disobedience have been used as early as 441 B.C. with Antigone and other religious groups. We must remember, however, this philosophy has also been used as recently as The Anti Vietnam War Movement. Civil disobedience is exercised by citizens that want to better society and they are at fault. Also, despite common belief, civil disobedience is not always non-violent. While citizens should work to improve citizens’ rights and create a better society, breaking the laws can lead to violence and corrupt a society through civil disobedience.…
Singer, tries to persuade that Bob’s situation is equivalent to everyday people who do not give to an organization to help aid those that are less fortunate. Although, he does make a point to say that we as a society put out luxuries over helping humans in need. What fails to be of equivalency to the situation and the reality of being exposed and seeing a state in which you are directly positioned to act upon verses something that you do not see, or are not exposed to it. Morally it is wrong for Bob to act upon the Buggatti instead of the child being directly responsible of his death and being cautiously aware that he killed a child in respects to saving a his car. In giving to an organization or in most cases not giving to an organization doesn’t give into a morally dramatic death of a child however, is simply an act of selfishness.…
to create change and bring awareness to those issues. In 1986, I participate in act of civil…
First, it is important to ask what seems like a simple question: What defines something as “illegal?” Well, of course, whatever is illegal must be what is against inscribed law. Is that so? Take this instance. You have Emmeline Pankhurst, a well known suffragette figure, facing arrest for perhaps blocking a side of a street during a protest while raising awareness about a petition. This action is viewed by the state as illegal, although, whose actions were really criminal? Those of Emmeline, or those of the state? “Just because the criminal happens to be in a position to call your action ‘illegal,’ that does not make the action criminal,” An argument proposed by M.I.T professor and anarchist…
Malcolm X once said, “You’re not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can’t face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it.” Meaning, unjust laws are unjust, regardless of who is decreeing the laws. The quote brings up a question, is it the duty of citizens to put morals over law? Yes, yes it is. It is an obligation as both citizens and human beings to oppose any oppression enforced upon their fellow citizens.…
“One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (MLK Jr). Everyone has the moral and ethical obligation to disobey unjust laws that are put in place. It comes down to one thing, whether the law is right or wrong. For most humans, the brain is fully developed by the age of 25 according to National Institute of Health, so the creators of laws are well aware of right and wrong.…
“Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.” While some aspects of certain laws may not be convenient for certain people or certain groups, my opinion is that if a person truly sees that a law is morally unjust, then disobeying it would be the just thing to do. Laws and regulations are the super-glue that holds society from being complete anarchy, but sometimes bringing the flaw of a law to the light can be a catalyst for progression.…