Preview

Human Rights Act

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1816 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Rights Act
The Human Right Act 1998 is an act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which received Royal Assent on 9 November 1998, and mostly came into force on 2 October 2000.It’s aim is to “give further effect” in UK law to the right contained in the European Convention on Human Right. The Act makes available in UK courts a remedy for breach of a Convention right, without the need to go to the European Court of Human Right in Strasbourg. It also totally abolished the death penalty in UK law although this was not required by the Convention in force for the UK at that time.

In particular, the Act makes it unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Convention, unless the wording of an Act of Parliament means they have no other choice. It also requires UK judges to take account of decisions of the Strasbourg. Court and to interpet legislatron,as far as possible, in a way which is compatible with the convention.However,if it is not possible to interpret an Act of Parliament so as to make it compatible with the Convention, the judges are not allowed to override it. All they can do is issue a dedaration of incompatibility. This declaration does not effect the validity of the Act of parliament, in the way, the Human Right Act seeks to maintain the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty.

The convention was drafted by the council of Europe after World War 2.Sir David Maxwell-Fyye was the chair of Council’s legal and administrative division from 1949 to 1952,and oversaw the drafting of the European Convention on Human Rights. It was designed to incorporate a traditional civil liberties approach to securing “effective political democracy”, from the strong traditions of freedom and liberty in the united kingdom. As a founding member of the council of Europe, the UK acceded to the European convention on human Rights in March 1951.However it was not until Harold Wilson’s government in the 1960 that British citizens where alde to bring claims in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The most important development in the protection of rights in the UK has been the installation of the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law via the Human Rights Act 1998. This act effectively has provided a document that outlines the rights of citizens. Since the passing of this act, judges have been able rule more confidently based on the legislation rather than using complex declarations of the common law. The ease for judges and clearness for citizens has increased the effectiveness of rights protection by the judiciary because now the judiciary can use articles in the HR Act to rule in favour of individuals. For example, in the case of Catherine Zeta Jones v. Hello Magazine 2001, the court was able to rule clearly that the article 8 right to privacy outweighed the magazine's article 10 right to expression and thus Zeta Jones' wedding was allowed to remain private. This clearly shows an effective protection of liberty by judges.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour’s first major reform to the UK constitution was the introduction of the Human Rights Act (1998). This act has safeguarded rights such as the right to life and the right to a fair trial. Prior to this act, our human rights were just included in common law, which can be easily changed. And so, this constitutional reform was a major step forward. However, this reform was incomplete as a new bill of rights and duties was proposed, but no legislation was put forward by the Government. And so, it can be seen that although there was a change to the UK constitution, the lack of an entrenched bill of human rights shows that the reform did not go far enough.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1997, many constitutional reforms have taken place. For example, the Human Rights Act that was passed in 1998, but came into effect in October 2000. The HRA incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into UK law. There are arguments that propose that the HRA of 1998 was inadequate in that it isn’t fully binding on the UK Parliament. The HRA doesn’t constitute an entrenched Bill of Rights, and thus it cannot be used to overturn parliamentary Acts - meaning that rights are still under threat, as the anti-terrorism acts that have been passed make the HRA effectively useless under those circumstances. Also, the HRA didn’t actually introduce any new laws, but merely made the accessibility of justice easier, so for many UK citizens, the HRA didn’t actually change all that much. . However, the anti-terrorism acts would only constrain a tiny percentage of the human rights abuses in the UK in terms of getting fair treatment, and so the HRA has led to many successful victories for human rights campaigners. This can be seen through the 2004 case of nine suspected terrorists being released from Belmarsh Prison on the grounds that their arrest was based on a law that discriminated illegally between foreign nationals and UK citizens. Furthermore, prior to the introduction of the HRA, plaintiffs had to travel to Strasbourg in order to bring their grievances to the attention of the ECHR – a very costly and time consuming process. The HRA prevented this unnecessary stress, and making the ECHR applicable in the UK made a great deal of difference to how successful human rights cases were in the UK.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Human Rights Act (1998) discusses basic human rights that have been incorporated into UK law. These rights affect subjects such as issues in everyday life to torture and murder. Rights include the right to life, the right to respect for private and family life and the right to education.…

    • 2765 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Rights- Article 2

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereafter referred to as “ECHR”) sets out rights and freedoms for the members of Council of Europe and consists of 59 articles.[1] Article 2 -The Right to Life[2] is considered as a very important right out of all the rights. For example, in the case, Pretty v. the United Kingdom[3], the court stated that without life, one cannot enjoy any other rights or freedoms set out in the ECHR. The Right invokes both positive and negative obligations on the part of a member state. This essay would discuss such obligations and it’s limitations with reference to case law from the European Court of Human Rights( hereafter referred to as ECtHR).…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The European Convention on Human Rights was produced after the Second World War by the Council of Europe. The document outlines human rights and the freedoms every person should have including “the right to life, the right to liberty and the right to free expression” (BIHR, June 2006 p. 7) Following this, and in order to enforce the rights highlighted by the Council of Europe, The Human Rights Act came into effect in October 2000. This act means that public authorities in the UK, including Social Services, The NHS and the Government are obliged, by law, to follow the principles set out by the act to ensure protection of the public. It also means private organisations carrying out a public functions; such as charities, private care homes and private hospitals are required to give similar standards of care to those provided by public authorities. The rights highlighted in the act are split into three sections; absolute rights, limited rights and qualified rights. Absolute rights must never be restricted or limited, limited rights can be restricted or limited under certain circumstances and qualified rights can be restricted in order to protect the wider community or the rights of other people. (BIHR, June 2006 p. 8-9)…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The introduction of the Human Rights Act (1998) (HRA) into the English legal system imposed new requirements as to the interpretation of statutes. In particular in situations where conflicts arise between statutes and the HRA, judges are required to interpret legislation in a way which is compatible with Convention Rights. This presents a marked change from the traditional approach to statutory interpretation which is based on a much more literal approach. Here we assess the degree of this change in interpretation. We first review the traditional approach to statutory interpretation. We then turn our attention to the changes in interpretation which arise from the application of the Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights and show how judges can be said to be legislating human rights through their interpretation of Acts of Parliament. We then assess the degree to which this change can be considered to be radical. We indicate by case illustrations that in practice the interpretations used have not been radical since they appear to be consistent with the intentions of the legislation even though a literal approach to interpretation would have led to different decisions.…

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of human rights legislation is to protect the rights, freedoms, and responsibilities of the individual. It protects individuals against discrimination. It gives people the freedom of conscience and religion, freedom of speech, freedom of peaceful assembly along with many others…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics

    • 674 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly with the introduction of the human rights act it has protected people of the UK means that people can be protected more easily, it incorporates into domestic law the rights and liberties enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights. This has been used well in the UK and the one of the main examples of when the human rights act was evident was in 1993 during the killing of toddler Jamie Bulger. The court imposed a lifetime ban on revealing the new identities of Thompson and Venables, the two boys convicted of killing the toddler. The ban was granted on the grounds that identifying them might threaten their right to life and could also result in their being subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment. The court also held that such a ban might protect the boys right to private and family life. However it is seen as controversial that the boys are able to live a life after the actions they did.…

    • 674 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These instruments primarily include: the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals; the right to a fair trial both in civil and in criminal cases; and equality of all before the law. Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) states the right of individuals to judicial protection as: “Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.” In this respect, the UDHR takes into account the possibility of legal proceedings in any state. The European Convention on Human Rights (1953) does not profoundly pole apart from the UDHR and it declares: “Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Rights Act 1998

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Human Rights Act 1998 states that when judges are deciding cases in which a question about a Convention right has been brought forward, the court must take into account any judgment, decision, declaration or advisory opinion of the European Court of Human Rights. This means that instead of a conflicting decision by the United Kingdom court, the court must follow decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Rights Speach

    • 711 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1948, was the result of the experience of the Second World War. With the end of that war, and the creation of the United Nations, the international community vowed never again to allow atrocities like those of that conflict happen again. World leaders decided to complement the UN Charter with a road map to guarantee the rights of every individual everywhere. The document they considered, and which would later become the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, was taken up at the first session of the General Assembly in 1946. The Assembly reviewed this draft Declaration on Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms and transmitted it to the Economic and Social Council "for reference to the Commission on Human Rights for consideration . . . in its preparation of an international bill of rights." The Commission, at its first session early in 1947, authorized its members to formulate what it termed "a preliminary draft International Bill of Human Rights". Later the work was taken over by a formal drafting committee, consisting of members of the Commission from eight States, selected with due regard for geographical distribution. The Commission on Human Rights was made up of 18 members from various political, cultural and religious backgrounds.…

    • 711 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was created and signed on December 10, 1948, there was legislatives from 48 countries who came together at the United Nations in Paris who believed in the value and respect for human life. (unac.org) After several drafts and much debate, the final version of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) emerged. The (UDHR) was a list of primary privileges that the worldwide group decided were equal and just for all humans. (unac.org)…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Rights Protection

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages

    At the beginning, only a few lucky people had any rights, and through the history of human being there were many documents and declarations trying to define and protect human rights. They were often violated very cruel and one of the best known events were World War I. and II. And then comes formed the United Nations and under the supervision of Eleanor Roosevelt was created Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) that applies to everyone and Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) signed by members of the Council of Europe. Human rights protection is anchored in many documents and the first formal EU document to combine in a single text the whole range of civil, political, economic and social rights and certain “ third generation” rights such as the right to good administration or the right to a clean environment is The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2010).[2]…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is human rights? We have always heard the phrase ‘human rights’ being used in newspapers, essays, even in daily life but have we ever truly understood its meaning? Human right is an act that aims to protect the basic welfare of the people in the world regardless of age, religion or race. It is an act that aims to ensure that there is equality among the people. However, the question here is – Is it being followed? Are people, companies and governments abiding by the basic rights or is there any rights being opposed? I believe that the human rights act was passed for a reason and under no context should it be acceptable to violate it.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays