Preview

Human Nature Is Inherently Bad

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
283 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Nature Is Inherently Bad
Human Nature Is Inherently Bad

There are many theories as to Human nature. One of which exists, under the thoughts of a prominent philosopher, and founder of Psychoanalysis Sigmund
Freud.
His deductive argument, entails his conclusion that man is bad, or as
Freud explains it as Homo Homini Lupus (man is a wolf to man). Freud justification for such a drastic approach type conclusion, can by described as basically atrocities of the century Freud lived in. In example the invasion of the Huns, as a brutal entity designed to portray Man's innately evil nature. And the atrocities of the First World War. Freud's view of Man is an evil one. And that all Men are innately evil and aggression lies within the human as a part of his nature. Our inclination to aggression is apparent in one's relation with his neighbor and is apparent in everyday casual behavior. Freud also states that as a civilized society we use violence only on criminals and that the law is not able to prosecute the more careful, and smaller aggression of man which can sometimes be just as evil. Freud also introduces the restrictions set forth by civilization to control the aggressive inclinations of Man (used in the plural sense). Freud's argument is comprised of factually correct statements ( for his time ). His premises are accepted by many leading Psychologists' today. However the notion that Man is innately evil does not sit well with me and probably not with most optimists, such as myself. His argument's conclusion is well supported and his premises meet the conditions of a deductive argument with relevance and grounds. This argument can be understood as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Freud’s idea states that the psyche - which is made up of the (id, ego and superego), should all work in perfect harmony with each other to avoid being an abnormal person. It is the idea that conscious thoughts and feelings are determined by the unconscious mind, and essentially being mentally healthy requires a good balance between: the id (which controls the desires for which we live for in order to satisfy ourselves), the superego (which takes into consideration morals and the difference between right and wrong) and the ego (which balances the superego and id to keep our behaviour in check). From these 3 components in the psyche, you can quickly see that the id and superego are constantly in conflict. This ultimately means that for a person to not develop a psychological disorder - a strong ego is necessary as it will “get the best of both worlds” and create a balance, while allowing the superego and id to express themselves (when suitable), without dominating the personality and hence, causing a psychological disorder. An example of an abnormality which could occur from the id being too strong in kids (is developing conduct disorders). In adults (they become psychopaths), all because of the personality being taken over by the id. If the superego is too strong socially acceptable pleasures will be hard to come by as neurotic behaviours such as phobias and obsessions will be apparent, as they will be constantly fixated with things that they want to do but “cant” because their too scared.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sigmund Freud was the first to think of the suggestion of a large unconscious that affects much of our behavior. He believed in The Id, The Ego, and The Superego, and that those parts of our mind controlled our behavior. The Id, running on the “pleasure principle”, is desires you have that are not socially acceptable. The Ego, running on the “reality principle”, is rational and logical thinking. The Superego, running on the “morality principle” represses the unacceptable desires of The Id and focuses on blending into social norms. Understanding the ideas of Freud can give you a different perspective of yourself and others due to whether the person displays examples of The Id, The Ego, and The Superego, showing the many factors that can come…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous beliefs on a man’s perspective. One, they are either born evil or two, they are born “nature good.” The belief that man is born evil is an outrage thought. On the other hand, the belief that man is born good and is dishonored by society though, is not. A philosopher that can agree with this idea is John Locke. “Locke believed that everyone was born with a blank slate and that what you experience determines if you are good or evil.” Now in my beliefs, I think that man is born good, with a clean slate and society is what corrupts man to evil. John Locke is accurate in what he believes in. Knowledge does determine whether if man is good or evil and society does take place as taking the role in corrupting humans. There are many great examples that can set this idea true.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that people have a natural tendency toward evil- but with saving glimpses of goodness because people can choose to do the right thing or the wrong thing, but sadly, many go for the wrong option. Being evil is easier for humans since this comes naturally to them. Humans are lazy and we would rather be evil than good, man also has a tendency to think and put themselves before others, for example, when thinking about a problem or situation, it is natural for everyone to firstly think “Will that help me?” “Will I be safe?”…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is man inherently evil? Many people have different answers to this question some do not believe that there is such a thing as good or evil. What is good and evil? Is evil a part of every human being from the moment he is on this planet? I think that man himself chooses in which direction to go to and the environment influences his or her decisions. Many think that you are not inherently evil or good it is you and the environment that makes you evil or good. William Golding in his book is trying to prove and say through his book that people are evil by nature. If a person does not see, what he has done is wrong or evil than you cannot consider this evil or wrongdoing. Evil is when a person knows that what he is doing is wrong but he wants and does it anyway.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The difference in the way humans perceive things is part of the complexity of mankind. What is thought of as evil to one person can be seen as good to another, and vice versa. The issue of good and evil is brought up in William Golding's Lord of the Flies, when innocent boys are set on an island to bear the weight of society on their backs. What happens to them? How do past influences effect them? Are their actions good or evil? The actions of the boys were not a matter of being good or evil, but were actions for survival. A man's environment does not influence him towards good or evil, nor is he born with it inside. Man has instincts and inner drives that are not matters of good and evil, but of survival.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lord of the Flies Essay

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Humans are capable of many things, including evil. We are not perfect we are built on our flaws. But the evil…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud adheres to strict gender roles to which people should no longer be limited. This adherence shows a lack of psychological understanding on Freud’s part due to his refusal to acknowledge the fact that women are just as mentally capable in every facet of life as men. Because his work lacks a sense of equality, one could criticize Freud’s understanding of the human mind and civilization. There is no proof, even within primitive humans, that females had lesser mental capabilities than males. The only differences between males and females are physical, a fact that Freud tends to dance around but never includes within his theories. Therefore, Freud makes hasty, false assumptions in the creation of his theories, which proves detrimental to the overall legitimacy of his work as evidenced by his lack misunderstanding of female capabilities, his misunderstanding of gender roles, and his misunderstanding of love.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Evil” – defined by Dictionary.com as “morally wrong or bad; immoral; harmful; characterized by misfortune or suffering” (“Evil”) – is a very complicated topic few people can fully agree on. The view on whether people are born evil or are raised to be evil is highly subjective. What some people consider to be evil, others might believe to be valiant. Although researchers have been exploring many different viewpoints to find the correct answer to this controversy, their results insinuate that evil is found in the eye of the beholder. However, with some of the world’s greatest reprobates nominated for Nobel Peace Prizes and others been given the key to a city, it can be derived that a person develops evil impulses…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature

    • 1288 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Aztecs were a Native American tribe who came to be in 1300. They lived in the…

    • 1288 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Man Inherently Good

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Is man inherently good or evil? To answer that question we will examine humanity’s past and present acts. We will discuss the causation of man through their natural acts, through wars, conflicts and common acts of violence. We will show that humanity is neither inherently evil nor good. However, we often settle our personal disagreements through common violent acts. Wars are fought because we want to establish our dominance or have some kind of agenda. Briefly mentioned are some common theories suggesting the reasoning behind such wicked behaviors. Also discussed is the examination of each team member’s personal values, which is an idea, accepted by individuals or a group; beliefs are any cognitive content held as true; morals are principles of right and wrong or, conforming to standards of behavior and character based on those principles. These are based in cultural and social constructs which vary from culture to culture. Thomas Hobbes, a 17th century philosopher viewed human beings as naturally egoistic creatures who seek their own welfare, even if this leads to aggression against others. Hobbes argued that people join into society to gain security from others. A century later Jean-Jacques Rousseau disputed Hobbes’ theory, and in 1762 Rousseau wrote humans are natural compassionate loners. But, unlike animals, human behavior is not determined by instinct; human behavior is acquiescent; it changes in the societies within which humans live. Rousseau argues that the violent traits that Hobbes attributes to human nature are actually caused by the type of society in which people live and not essential human nature (Aronson, Wilson, & Akert, 2007).…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Inborn Evil of Mankind

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the novel Lord of the Flies, Golding’s pessimistic view that evil is an inborn trait of mankind is valid. Firstly, what seems like a little vacation for the boys is quickly erased by the brutal savage-like behavior that many of the boys on the island possess. Secondly, the death of Simon or goodness on the island shows that evil has completely taken over the boys’ minds. Lastly, the fact that the beast lies within mankind symbolizes the evil that is present in humanity. Therefore, the boys on the island express the innate evil in mankind that can possibly be released when there is no structure and very little means of survival.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Man inherently good or evil? This is a question that many philosophers, psychologists, and scientists have questioned for centuries. We have learned from Webster that good is morally excellent, virtuous, and pious. He also states that evil is the total opposite. Evil is morally wrong or bad and immorally wicked. I believe that man is inherently evil simply because when a baby is born the nature of evil is already in existence. This only indicates that humans don’t have to be taught to do wrong. (As human beings we have the most extraordinary capacity for evil, but we as a people also have an…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is Mankind Inherently Evil

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, the word ‘good is defined as “Of a favorable character or tendency,” and the word evil is defined as, “morally reprehensible.” Philosophers and Psychologist have debated on the topic of humans being good or evil for centuries and our society is still unsure of what to believe. Humans do not like to think of themselves as pure evil, but they also do not consider themselves all good either. Although some may claim humans are inherently good , the truth is humankind is inherently evil because of selfishness, and revenge.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alfred Adler

    • 3008 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Textbook example of his personality theory- overcoming childhood weakness and inferiority to shape his destiny…

    • 3008 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics