Preview

How Should Breathalyzer Testing Be Allowed In Schools Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
523 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Should Breathalyzer Testing Be Allowed In Schools Essay
School prom is one of the momentous events for students, which is the reason of some schools want to implement breathalyzer to ensure students’ safety. In my opinion, schools should not administer breathalyzer test at proms because it offends students civil rights, makes them guilty although they are not, and stands against students’ willingness. As young adults, students have civil rights which protect personal privacy and ensure their ability to participate in social activities, such as a prom. According to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, if the school sets the breathalyzer test as a mandatory procedure before the prom, it infringes students’ privacy even though it intends to prevent the intake of drugs and alcohol. The school is responsible to maintain the safety instead of administering an unconstitutional policy which is against human rights. In addition, the breathalyzer test is against the presumption of innocence, which is one of the legal principles. For example, the student group at the Northern Secondary School argued for the prohibition of the policy successfully as a precedent because the way the test would work made them feel guilty. Students were being forced to stand in a line and wait to go through the test which was an unappropriated way because it inferred that every student in the line could be culpable. Despite …show more content…
The prom supposes to be a relaxation after finishing the semesters and students do not want a melancholy atmosphere first when they are waiting for the breathalyzer test. Again, almost all of the students in the Northern Secondary School were against the policy. On the contrary, it did not affect the ticket sell which also showed how desirous the students were about the prom. The only requirement from students is to be able to enjoy the end of being a high school student instead of wasting their time on waiting for a safety

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill”, the students’ expectation of privacy outweighs the obligation of the school leaders to maintain good order and discipline in that there is no clear and reasonable threat to student safety or order. The students’ constitutional rights should not be jeopardized over twenty dollars. Furthermore, a bathroom search of any students must be reasonable related to the objectives of the search and must not be excessively intrusive. Since there was only twenty-dollars involved this case, a bathroom search would be highly unconstitutional considering the age of the students and amount of money involved. This is evidenced by a similar case Safford vs. Redding 2008.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michigan V. Sitz

    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: The Michigan State Police established a sobriety checkpoint pilot program that went on for only one day. “Under the guidelines, checkpoints would be set up at selected sites along state roads. All vehicles passing through a checkpoint would be stopped and their drivers briefly examined for signs of intoxication. In cases where a checkpoint officer detected signs of intoxication, the motorist would be directed to a location out of the traffic flow where an officer would check the motorist’s driver’s license and car registration and, if warranted, conduct further sobriety tests. Should the field tests and the officer’s observations suggest that the driver was intoxicated, an arrest would be made. All other drivers would be permitted to resume their journey immediately.”…

    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a town named Vernonia, Oregon, the local public schools faced a major problem regarding the drug use of students while participating in high school athletics (3). The Vernonia School Board were disturbed that drug use increases the risk of sports-related injury (4), so they approved an anti-drug policy, the Student Athlete Drug Policy, which requires random drug testing of the school’s student athletes (5). However, this became a conflict with the parents of a child named James Acton. The parents refused to sign a consent form to allow their kid to take the drug test because they felt it went against the 4th Amendment’s prohibition against “unreasonable” searches (6). The case was dismissed in the Federal District Court and was appealed to the Court of Appeals for the 9th District (7). This court favored the Acton families’ complaint, but random drug testing in public schools was ruled allowable in 1988 in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin (8). The case went on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to conclude conflicting court decisions (9).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors also state that suspicionless searches teach students that rights do not matter. I disagree with the author's point of view on overstating the dangers of drugs in schools. I believe it is a growing concern in our public school system. How do we expect a student to concentrate in class if he is stoned all the time? I think instituting random school searches should be on a case by case basis by school district. Blankenau and Leeper's article do not raise any issues of escalating school violence. Are weapons growing concerns like drugs are? The authors surveyed responses of Nebraska High School Principles to obtain data on how effective their drug polices have been. The article in this book does not allow me to make any comments on the strengths and weaknesses of their field study because they did not go in depth of what the study…

    • 4872 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    MADD Canada wanted to in force the use of breath test for a way to narrow evidence available for defences against impaired driving, specifically the “Carter Defence’ and the ‘Last Drink Defence’.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More importantly, prom is a rite of passage that leads to one's adulthood. Due to prom's significant meaning for adolescence, students do not want it to be ruined by the breathalyzer test. Northern Secondary School was the host of the prom, therefore they could not turn an blind eye to students who are drinking while attending a school event. In my opinion, the school should implement other proactive actions fight against underage drinking in connection with the prom, rather than conduct breathalyzer test which could violate students freedom and privacy. Furthermore, the school policy that required every student to submit to a breathalyzer test before entering the prom invoked many constitutional concerns. This overbroad approach would let all the students to administer the breathalyzer test even if they are not exhibiting signs of intoxication. I could not picture a line of gowns and tuxedos waiting for the breathalyzer test before gaining their entrance to prom. Each student will perform its breathalyzer test in front of a huge amount of people, included both students and schools staffs, who will all then be aware of the results of the…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As long as college students, legal and underage, drink with responsibility on or off campus without any means of causing disturbance, destruction, or injury to themselves or others, then the schools should not be held responsible nor care, for that matter, of what students can do when it comes to any type of alcohol consumption. Even if to say a college student was to die from alcohol abuse, no matter the age, on campus, the university should still not be liable for the poor choices that student made for it wasn’t the school that made that student drink themselves to death. Each student has a conscious mind and knows how to utilize it, and if a university were to control it just because one immature student chose not to is inadmissible. However, some students may seem irresponsible with drinking habits due to the fact that they are new to…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all, most high school students are underage. This means that their parents are still their guardians, and therefore should be able to protect their child from whatever they see fit. However, many students often show more maturity than adults expect of them. The average high school student gets his or her driver's’ license at some point during his or her sophomore year. The ability to drive is an immense, and dangerous, responsibility, as countless potentially fatal mistakes can be made while driving, yet teenagers are trusted with this responsibility. Therefore, if students are trusted with driving, then they should be trusted to be able to choose what to…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is a major problem for teens because drunken teenagers are more likely to get in a car crash then an adult drunk driver and drunk driving should not even be done. Many teens are also pressured into drunk driving which again has a high chance in getting into a crash.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With these laws in place to ban trick or treating for ages 17 and higher more teens are out later and drinking more. Under age drinking is a risk factor that has appeared because of the age ban.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some think that high school students should have their licences taken away for having poor grades, and others think that schools do not have the right to do that. What do you think? The following paragraphs with explain the pros and cons of schools provoking student's licenses, and why Wyoming should not adopt this law.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug abuse has always been a very delicate question as it always it deals with the health, well-being and even lives of human beings belonging to any country. Many people have argued that mandatory drug testing is a violation of their civil rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment grants you the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, otherwise known as a person's right to privacy. However, employers have the right to know whether or not the people working under them are stable to do their jobs. Indeed, for safety of all the humans randomly drug testing is the best way to maintain the quality of the employees.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Breathalyzers Work

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Busted for driving under the influence? Let’s admit it, drinking is indeed fun, therefore it is one of the most popular activities across the world. It is even considered a basic need for some people and forms many cultures. After drinking, the safest way to get back home is either to take a taxi or to have your designated driver drive you home. Still, there are some stubborn ones who insist on driving back home even though they are aware that they had much to drink. That is why we have cops to clean up the drunk drivers from the streets and they carry a simple device called a breathalyzer. The term "breathalyzer" is actually the brand name of the breath-analyzing products manufactured by Smith and Wesson in the late 1950s, a huge improvement from "drunkometer". You might have seen one on television, used on a person or even on you, but do you have any idea how it works?…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although students do not lose their rights as they walk through the school gates, their rights are restricted for the safety of others. The court case of Tinker v. Des Moines argues the same issue of the rights of students while on school grounds. “Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work, they detracted from the ability of the school officials to perform their duties, so the school district was well within its rights to discipline the students” (OYEZ). As the armbands distracted students, the inappropriate photos of Suzie distracted upperclassmen from their educational work, which also put Suzie in an uncomfortable position depriving herself the ability to focus 100% on school work. Therefore, the principal was taking away a distraction to discipline the students which can be compared to the case of Tinker v. Des…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is clearly stated in our nation's Declaration of Independence that all men, (and women for that matter) are created equal. So students should be able to drive to school in their vehicles just as faculty and staff do. For one, if schools did ban students from driving their cars to school, many students will complain to the school board because their whole purpose of getting a car was to have means of transportation to and from school. That is thousands of dollars wasted on a vehicle you spent your hard earned money on. Students would also complain about this issue because many students wouldn't want to wake up forty minutes early just to make it to a designated bus stop on time. Just as teachers have a job teaching, students have jobs as well.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays