“How My View on Gay Marriage Changed”
At the time, gay marriage is a steaming hot topic of discussion in the United States. The right of marriage between man and man or woman and woman is one of the most controversial debates in the history of America. On several locations around the globe, fore an example in europe, gay marriage is a legal act. But should homosexuals have the same rights as “normal” people when it comes to marriage? A lot of different reasons why gays should not be able to get married, have occurred in this discussion. Also people around the States walk the streets, demonstrating pro and con due to the proposal of a law letting gays get married.
One of the reasons why homosexuals should not have the right to get married, according to american law and point of view is, that if it is possible by society, a child has the right to be taken care of by the parents who gave them life. David Blankenhorn argued for this in a californian court referring to a piece of law by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
”I opposed gay marriage believing that children have the right, insofar as society makes it possible, to know and to be cared for by the two parents who brought them into this world. I didn’t just dream up this notion: the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which came into force in 1990, guarantees children this right. Marriage is how society recognizes and protects this right. Marriage is the planet’s only institution whose core purpose is to unite the biological, social and legal components of parenthood into one lasting bond. Marriage says to a child: The man and the woman whose sexual union made you will also be there to love and raise you. In this sense, marriage is a gift that society bestows on its children. “ - David Blankenhorn, “How My View on Gay Marriage Changed”. The New York Times website, June 23, 2012. (www.nytimes.com)
David Blankenhorn also argues that marriage package solution...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document