Preview

How Is Jean Bodin On Sovereignty Different From The 16th Century?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1493 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Is Jean Bodin On Sovereignty Different From The 16th Century?
History tends to repeat itself. This phrase has been said for as long as I can remember; reason being is how much truth it holds. The document by Jean Bodin titled “On sovereignty” is from the 16th century while the one by Catherine The Great titled is from the 18th century. There is a full century between these two documents and yet their ideas are so closely related. Many differences yes but the similarities are quite surprising. I will show that even though these documents are for two different countries in two different times they are still very similar because of what was happening when they wrote them. Jean Bodin wrote his document during a time that saw many religious wars being fought throughout Europe. Therefore, his opinions were …show more content…
However, the first part of his idea is a step towards equality, a key issue Catherine discusses. Catherine removes the privileges idea and states citizens “should all be subject to the same Laws” (Brophy, pg.167). They share a similar idea here; equality is needed in a just society. This is incredibly important in believing in an absolute Sovereign, if equality was not to be upheld the risk of creating a tyrant is …show more content…
This is an idea that was created because of context. Bodin feared more religious wars would destroy France and Catherine wanted to stop serfdom. Each wanted to do things for the greater good and move past fighting over a person’s status or faith. Law is something that is held highly in both documents. Catherine declares that “if any one citizen could do what the laws forbid, there would be ni more liberty” (Brophy,pg. 167) in fact there would probably be chaos. Bodis also understood this but in a slightly different way. A citizen does not have to obey a tyrant but he cannot attempt anything against the sovereign. For if he did it would only lead to another tyrant and another thus creating a cycle of tyrants because the person that kills one is likely to take over and abuse his power so he won’t be killed. Some type of law is being upheld in both document and their importance is stressed.
If the sovereign is as just as described, citizens will obey law. Catherine claims that a citizen’s natural liberty must be kept. An idea I believe Bodin briefly introduced. As stated before citizens do not have to obey laws implemented by a tyrant, this implies that a citizen withholds some natural rights that must be kept in mind by a King. If they are not then a citizen should not have to obey laws that infringe on them. This progressive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    in louis xiv. He made all the decisions and no one could stop or disagree with…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau’s makes it clear that “the only will dominating government should be the general will or the law.” The National Assembly of France used this principle in the sixth listed right in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen which reads that “the law is an expression of the general will.” The general will, as Rousseau states, is for the best of the common interest of the country. The king will not always act in the best interest of his country, so it is imperative to form a constitutional monarchy that seeks to act in the best interest of the general…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    And that for several reasons. First. The powers of governing still remaining in the hands of the king, he will have a negative over the whole legislation of this continent. And as he hath shown himself such an inveterate enemy to liberty, and discovered such a thirst for arbitrary power; is he, or is he not, a proper man to say to these colonies, "You shall make no laws but what I please"....Secondly. That as even the best terms, which we can expect to obtain, can amount to no more than a temporary expedient, or a kind of government by guardianship, which can last no longer than till the colonies come of age, so the general face and state of things, in the interim, will be unsettled and…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    •the king himself now had to obey the laws of England; this was a brand new idea: that even the king was not above obeying the law…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror DBQ

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The King’s blood flowed and cries of joy from eight thousand armed men struck my ears.” A man that witnessed the guillotining of King Louis XVI was left with this graphic image of a memorable event leading to the Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror, otherwise known as the French Revolution, was an attempt to form a new government in France. The citizens of France fought against their government and made a new government led by Maximilen de Robespierre. This new government executed large numbers of individuals whom were “enemies” of the Revolution. This government went so far to preserve their vision of liberty and equality. France was violently demanding “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity”. Was it necessary to murder 30,000 by guillotining them in the middle of town square for everyone to witness? Did the 2,750 people sentenced to death without any evidence deserve their fate? The Reign of Terror was not justified because of the reaction towards external threats, the treatment of internal threats, and the malevolent methods used by this new government to carry-out their vision of a perfect government.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Translation: The King has refused to sign or consider other laws that enact provisions for large groups of People unless those People give up their right to be represented in the Government – in other words, they must give up their freedom to get the King to pass the law… something only a Tyrant would ask the People to do.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Catherine was a Polish princess who was arranged to marry a Russian czar named Peter. Catherine despised her marriage. She had many lovers and affairs which was costly since she gave her loves high official positions and lavish lifestyles. Catherine plotted against her husband to murder him. She was later on the Russian throne illegally. She then needed the support of the nobles to stay in power and maintain her lavished life. To get their support she gave them tax exemptions. Because of this, she would need to get more money from the serfs. To make sure the serfs' tax money was collected, she also gave the nobles more status and complete control over their serfs and local governments. This strengthened serfdom and gave nobles more power over their areas. Although she condemned serfdom in theory, it was strengthened in her reign.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He argued that man was born naturally stable and desired good and needed to watch the government around them to guarantee that the government does not fail to protect those basic rights. He also argues that there shouldn’t be laws that affect only some people, like the rich versus the poor, but rather affect everyone.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Absolute Government

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A monarch's authority to govern should be absolute because then there would be less conflict between differing parties. In Document 3, Bossuet writes that the prince need render no account to anyone for the orders he gives. Instead of having to discuss why a decision was made or discussing what decisions should be made, an absolute ruler can make a decision and no one would question him. John Locke believes that if the commands of a prince were opposed it would unhinge and overturn all politics, and instead of government and order, leave nothing but anarchy and confusion (Document 4). Differing parties are not only government officials but also the people being governed. In an absolute government the people should not oppose the ruler. Bousett believes men must obey princes as they obey justice itself, without which there can be no order or purpose in things (Document 3). The authority of a monarch should be absolute because there would be less conflict between differing…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Equality’s independence is what drives him to think individually. Despite powerful pressure from the Council to conform as group, he does not give up on the values that are…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the time he was a child he was taught that “everything which comes from the many is good. Everything which comes from one is evil” (Pg 85), but as he grows and learns and as he “walks through the forest, [he] is learning to doubt it” (Pg 86). Now, instead of reciting to himself that he must work for the collective he says to himself, “I ask none to live for me, nor do I live for any others. I covet no man's soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet” (Pg 96). He doesn’t want people to live for him and he doesn't want to live for others, he wants to live for himself and himself only. Equality also establishes a new goal for himself in the end which is to become happy as well as free and to pass along these thoughts to the following generations. Equality says that he will “break all the chains of the earth, and raze the cities of the enslaves, and [his] home will become the capital of a world where each man will be free to exist for his own sake”(Pg 104). Equality will fight for human rights and freedom of man until people do exists for their own sake. In conclusion, Equality no longer will work for the collective, he will no longer things he doesn’t want to do, he is now an individual and he will only do things with his free will, and he will make sure all men will one day have that same…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq: the Enlightenment

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some of the ideas of the Enlightenment were used to challenge absolute monarchy. One example is given in Document # 1, Montesquieu who was a French philosopher during the Enlightenment, states, “There can be no liberty with the executive, legislative, and judicial powers are united in one person or body it a persons, because such concentration is bound to result in arbitrary despotism.” In this statement, Montesquieu is stating that liberty cannot exist where three powers of government are held by one person or body of persons. This is because then the people would not have rights for themselves. The idea was used to challenge an absolute…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Test Corrections

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages

    are united in the same person or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty because…the same monarch or senate…(may) enact tyrannical laws.” The author of this passage was:…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    their allegiance to the crown and affirming their likeness to its other subjects, including the entitlement to certain inherent rights and liberties. It goes on to establish the need for representation in the government and the impossibility…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The document is very sympathetic towards Catherine, and does not provide multiple sides of an event, instead going in-depth on Catherine's actions and motives. The source will be warily quoted, as between the interpretation of primary sources and translations that occurred before actually writing the book, it is unlikely a quote or excerpt is word for word.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays