Preview

How far was Henry VII's control of the nobility 1485 to 1509 due to his financial policies?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How far was Henry VII's control of the nobility 1485 to 1509 due to his financial policies?
HOW FAR WAS HENRY VII’S CONTROL OF THE NOBILITY 1485 TO 1509 DUE TO HIS FINANCIAL POLICIES? (24 marks)

Controlling nobility was important to Henry and arguably posed to be one of the biggest challenges he faced. He relied on them for a number of reasons but he also knew the importance of keeping them under control, since they had been responsible in part for overthrowing the last three kings at one time or another. As well as financial policies, he also passed a number of non-financial policies, which contributed to the change in relations between the nobles and the crown during his reign.

Henrys complex financial policies were important in his control of the nobility. For example, he used bonds and recognaisances, which were raised for political and financial purposes, to restrain the power of his nobility. Between 1504 and 1508, £50,000 per annum was collected from the bonds, which shows that they obviously contained power in controlling nobles. Another device that Henry used were feudal dues. Wardships were the feudal due which most irked the nobility since it gave the king control of a nobles’ land and it also gave the king control over the marriage of there children, which if the heir was a female could mean that the family lost control of its land entirely. His careful management of crown lands is another example of how Henry’s power over his nobility rested on his successful financial policies. Henry had more crown land than previous monarchs, some lands were confiscated under the acts of attainder and others were reclaimed after the acts of resumption. This secured control and authority over England, and by 1508 his annual income from royal estates had rose from £12,000 in 1486 to £42,000. Finally, Henry used attainders and fines to avoid wars caused by nobles, which had caused problems to previous monarchs. Henry used Acts of Attainders to declare a nobleman guilty of a crime against the crown. The noble might be imprisoned and the attainted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry worked hard to establish, consolidate and recover many foreign relations within his reign. This was mostly defensive due to pretenders threatening Henry’s throne which meant a lot of Henry’s foreign relations were defensive. However, Henry did also establish policies to help other factors during his reign.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How successful was Henry VII in dealing with challenges to his royal authority in the years 1489 to 1499?…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The household staff rose beyond mere servitude: Henry eschewed public appearances, therefore, staff members were the few persons Henry saw on a regular basis. He created the Committee of the Privy Council ,a forerunner of the modern cabinet) as an executive advisory board; he established the Court of the Star Chamber to increase royal involvement in civil and criminal cases; and as an alternative to a revenue tax disbursement from Parliament, he imposed forced loans and grants on the nobility. Henry's mistrust of the nobility derived from his experiences in the Wars of the Roses - a majority remained dangerously neutral until the very end. His skill at by-passing Parliament (and thus, the will of the nobility) played a crucial role in his success at renovating…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Henry V had two major areas of impact, his first campaign into France in 1415, in which he captured a powerful tool in the form of the castle Harfluer. During the same campaign he won a decisive victory at Agincourt, smashing the French opponents even when heavily outnumbered. His other area of significance was his second campaign into France, in which he would eventually conquer all of Normandy and take the French crown for England. Henry V achieved all of the goals during his lifetime; he conquered and occupied all the northern areas of France. Most importantly though, is that he secured the throne of France for England.…

    • 3238 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nobility were important in maintaining political stability as the Crown relied heavily on them for many different purposes,…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry’s political champion that would make both men vastly wealthy during their time of absolute power? Although these interpretations contain elements of truth, either way it would ultimately lead to his demise. Historians have had a continuous battle to determine the character of the multifaceted political animal that is Thomas Cromwell. The impact Cromwell had on English society made for the greatest political changes in the sixteenth century. He was one of Henry VIII’s most cherished advisors, however, to what extent did Cromwell’s own political and religious beliefs impact Henry and the course of…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly Edward outsourced some power to his nobles for them to protect and manage more volatile regions in England. Tis allowed the restoration of royal authority because it made sure that Edward had loyal nobles spread out across the country in strongholds, this would help stop rebellions and foreign armies invading. One example of this is when Edward gave his brother Richard duke of Gloseter the task of governing the north. The north at this time was a volatile region wit several disloyal lords to Edward as well as Scottish skirmishers crossing the borders into England.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During 1450- 1470, there were two main kingships; Henry VI and Edward IV. The first kingship was an…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VII and Retaining

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Retaining involved magnates taking men into their service, generally involving the payment of fees and sometimes the granting of a distinctive badge or uniform (livery).…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    alliance, marital bliss. King Henry ordered 72,000 executions during his reign, two of which were his wives. (Barksdale) Henry decided he didn’t need Pope Clement's approval to rule on issues concerning the church of England. Henry petitioned Pope Clements. However, he was rebuffed because of pressure from his first wife, Catherine’s, nephew. (History.com staff) Besides King Henry deciding he could just tule on everything without the pope he had been leading the country pretty well up until this point.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics