Preview

How Far Can the Decline of Soviet Power in Eastern Europe Be Blamed on the Solidarity Movement?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
305 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Can the Decline of Soviet Power in Eastern Europe Be Blamed on the Solidarity Movement?
How far can the decline of Soviet power in Eastern Europe be blamed on the Solidarity movement?

I think that the Solidarity movement played a key role in the collapse of the Soviet Union, because it not only influenced the biggest country in the Eastern Block, (Poland which shared a long border with the USSR and previously served as a corridor for attack on the Soviet Union), it also managed to attain over 10 million members and supporters nationwide. Since the Solidarity movement or Solidarity itself was a trade union, it had great economic and social powers, which it used to bring people together, organize strikes, and protests, which were aimed at promoting certain ideals, or laws that the communist government banned or rejected. The movement was very successful at this, which was partially due to its large membership (10 million) and effective leadership under the former electrician Lech Walesa. Towards the final days of the Soviet Union, during the late 1980's, 99 percent of the seats in the Polish Parliament were held by Solidarity, this was clearly a blow to the Polish communists and proved that the Soviet Union was losing control of it's Eastern European neighbors. It also proved that the USSR was no longer willing to use any force, to enforce the Brezhnev doctrine (which meant that many other countries could freely change their governments and impose capitalist values without the threat of a Soviet-led invasion).
However, we can argue that the Solidarity movement was only one of the lesser factors that contributed to the downfall of Soviet power in Eastern Europe. The reforms introduced by Gorbacev, were far more effective in the long term, as they paved the way for new freedoms and ideals, which eventually led to the disintegration of both the USSR and the Warsaw Pact

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    3. Russia’s revolution garnered enough support to topple the Czar’s government by pointing out what people were dealing with in normal life, and what they did not have compared to the rest of the world. The workers fought for pay which was equal to the income their work brought. Wars that were provoked by the Czar also helped because the people were not very fond of constant war because it meant more work for the war effort on top of the 12 hour shifts they were already forced to work.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Paul Seary Case

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Along the Baltic Coast, more than 500,000 workers downed tools in protest. In Gdansk, in the Lenin shipyard , a female activist was sacked and Lech Walesa , a former worker at the shipyard, who had been sacked four years before for trade union activities ,persuaded the workers to form an inter-factory strike committee under his chairmanship – and thus Solidarity was formed.’ When Jaruzelski imposed martial law and Solidarity was driven underground, between 1981 and 1984, it emerged even stronger and more militant . In 1989 a historic deal was done between Jaruzelski and Walesa which paved the way for the first democratic elections in the communist bloc in 45 years. Months later, in Warsaw, on Sunday June 4th 1989, victory was assured. ‘It was clear that a revolution had taken place within the Soviet Empire and it had happened peacefully, in the polling booths of Poland. Nobody expected the overwhelming scale of the Communists’ defeat – it was total humiliation for the Party that had ruled Poland for more than 40 years.’(3) Jaruzelski was furious and he blamed the Catholic Church for hastening the demise of the ruling regime but in truth the party had outlived itself and was disintegrating . Many within the party realised that this was more than just an election defeat – ‘it was the end of an age’.…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq Research Paper

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is, perhaps, and argument for Stalin's 'Bolshevik firmness' to have enabled the Soviet Union to accomplish incredible feats regarding its move from a mostly agrarian society in the early 1920s to…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1991, when Boris Yeltsin seized the power and the Belavezha Accords were signed, the decision to disband the Soviet Union had been made and supported by the governments of Ukraine and Belarus. On December 12, 1991 Russia’s secession from the Union was sealed, the Belavezha Accords were ratified and the 1922 treaty on the creation of the Soviet Union was denounced. It had been a long road, and arguably it was predictable. It was finally time for change.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During The Cold War, There was a total of 4 change in power. Joseph Stalin being the first dictator of The Soviet Union during The Cold War, Nikita Khrushchev being the second, Leonid Brezhnev the third, and Mikhail Gorbachev the final leader of The Soviet Union. “While this meant change the underlying political reality was that the Soviet system did not trust the people. Government was retained in the hand of Party apparatchiks which the public had no role in choosing. Economically there were improvements.” Despite the improvements, living conditions were poor for the citizens of The Soviet Union. “Agriculture remained a major weakness with poor yields”. Although The Soviet try to improve life for people, life was still poor. The economics…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How far do you agree that the lives of workers changed in Russia to a large extent between 1855 and 1964?…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Solidarity movement in Poland was one of the most dramatic developments in Eastern Europe during the Cold War. It was not a movement that began in 1980, but rather a continuation of a working class and Polish intelligentsia movement that began in 1956, and continued in two other risings, in 1970 and 1976. The most significant of these risings began in the shipyards of the 'Triple City', Gdansk, Sopot and Gdynia in 1970. The first and by far the most violent and bloody of the workers revolts came in June of 1956, when at least 75 people died in the industrial city of Poznan. The third uprising took place in 1976 with workers striking in Warsaw, and rioting in the city of Radom. <br><br>What made the Solidarity movement peaceful and far more successful in comparison to that of the previous three? The Solidarity movement originated in the working class, but unlike the previous three risings it also worked with and was involved with the Polish intellectual community. Was this the reason behind its success? Or was it instead the result of the U.S.S.R. losing it's hold in the Eastern bloc, and the fledgling economy of Poland that made such a movement inevitable? While everyone of these points was a factor, the strongest and most compelling argument can be made for the unification and working together of Poland's most influential social classes, the Polish intelligentsia, the workers, and the Church. This strategy eventually led to the infamous 'roundtable' talks, and the collapse of communism itself in Poland.<br><br><b>The Beginnings of a Movement</b><br>The 'Polish October' of 1956 did not begin with Stalin's death in 1953, in fact Poland was quite calm, in stark contrast with other Eastern bloc countries. While demonstrations took place in Plzen, Czechoslovakia, and a revolt was taking place in East Germany in mid-June, Poland was slow to follow the 'New Course' that was being offered by neighboring countries. This was a result of a much slower relaxation than the…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Khrushchev had a lot of good ideas that he wanted to implement but due to the bureaucratic nature of the Soviet party  officials weren’t keen on implementing certain reforms which offered no benefits to them despite being good for the population…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The rise of nationalism added to the troubles faced by the Kremlin during the 1980s. The growth of the Transcaucasia and Baltic Popular Fronts had brought the problem of the nationalities to the fore when in 1989 the Red Army entered Tbilisi to assist the Georgian authorities in putting down a rally. Soviet troops were also used to prop up the communist government of Azerbaijan under threat from nationalist forces (Chubarov, 2001; 195). The Baltic States did not join the chorus of statements of sovereignty which had come from Kazakhstan and Ukraine, this was because they regarded their incorporation into the USSR as an illegal act. They challenged the legality of the Molotov - Ribbentrop pact of 1939 and achieved international support in the form of the American refusal to recognise the annexation of the region (Strayer, 1998; 152-153). The policy of Perestroika can be seen as the catalyst for the increase in nationalism as the planned restructuring of the USSR exposed fundamental flaws in the Soviet system. The policy of Glasnost also exposed corruption within the Caucasian and Central Asian republics, Gorbachev responded by replacing the Kazakh Communist Party leader Kunaev with a Russian. This caused a great deal of rioting in Almaty (Strayer, 1998; 150-151). Further to the rise of popular front movements within the constituent republics, the Soviet Union was also facing a crisis with its East European satellites due in part to the policies of Glasnost and Perestroika. Glasnost and Perestroika are often cited as the most important factors in speeding the demise of the Soviet Union. Eric Hobsbawm claims that the only thing that made the soviet system work was the command structure of the party and the state which had been inherited from the days of Stalin (1995; 480). Once again it seemed that reform from the top was going to introduce fundamental change which was to be ultimately uncontrollable. Hobsbawm…

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poland DBQ

    • 1328 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyse the factors that contributed to the emergence of a workers’ opposition movement in Communist Poland in the period 1956-1981.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the war draws to a close and the USSR closes in on Berlin, the clash between Communism and capitalism becomes an unavoidable event. With an Allied victory, communist USSR would be a major player in determining the fate of postwar Europe. With differing societal beliefs between the capitalist west and communist USSR, the redrawing of Europe, particularly the division between West and East Berlin, left serious repercussions that played a definite impact on the Cold War.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From Revolution to Ruin: Unraveling the Complex Forces Behind the Soviet Union's Dissolution The collapse of the Soviet Union, a transformative event marking the end of a geopolitical era, was primarily driven by a combination of internal economic inefficiencies, failed political reforms such as Gorbachev's Perestroika and Glasnost, and the exacerbating effect of external pressures including the arms race and global shifts towards neoliberal policies. These factors, compounded by the rise of nationalist movements within its republics, not only highlighted the systemic flaws inherent in the Soviet economic and political structure but also significantly undermined the legitimacy of the Soviet state, leading to its eventual dissolution in 1991. Economic…

    • 2661 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many different opinions on why the once powerful Soviet Union fell including a stagnant economy, new reform policies, or general dismissal of communist ideology. Many of the issues that were either unresolved or worsened stem from Mikhail Gorbachev reign as General Secretary from 1985 until the collapse in 1991. While there were a plethora of issues surrounding the Soviet Union, Gorbachev seemed to be the focal point of where things went from bad to worse. Though Gorbachev had the Soviet…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The economy of the soviet Union played a big part as to why they collapsed because it had been stagnating throughout the 1970s, as Western economies moved into new technologies, the Soviets economy stayed based on Karl Marx's analysis of the British economy in the mid 19th Century. The Soviets focused on heavy industry such as coal, iron…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far do you agree that the weakness of the provisional government was the main reason why the Bolsheviks came into power?…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays