Preview

How Did The Revolution Influence The People Of Concord

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
778 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Revolution Influence The People Of Concord
Gross explains to the readers about how life was in Concord and how it was politically, socially and economically. He states that he will give us a lot of evidence about the people of Concord and give us there reactions to the revolution and how it changed them politically, socially, and economically. These three things shaped their lives and over time changed due to circumstances that have happened thanks to Parliament. But those three ideas made up something that the people of Concord needed, which were Magistrates. Magistrates were basically “a model of wisdom and righteousness, a lover of justice and champion of the people’s rights.”(33) The people looked up to them as “father” figures because they needed leaders to help them as much as possible. The downside of this is that no one of lower class could be a magistrate or someone of power. People from Concord felt that it would leave their government in a …show more content…
The Local government only dealt with what went on in the town only, so no outside matters came up. Still being under the Redcoats, the people were loyal until the British made a lot of bad decisions, with one of them being the Stamp Act in 1765. This act made people boycott imports from Britain because it taxed anything that was made from paper. Parliament later repealed this act to then give the Declaratory Act of 1766, which allowed Parliament to control the colonies through legislation. So they had complete control over all imports. Another bad decision was having troops stationed in the area in 1768 but two years later The Boston Massacre occurred. Making the people who were settled in these colonies rethink their pact with Parliament. The people of Concord wanted to take a stand but decided not to revolt yet since they wanted to have a better strategy and have stronger leaders back them up. But since the economy was crumbling from the British the settlers decided to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Still, however, in 1770, the colonists were continuing to show loyalty to the king, (document C). By this time, one main question arose in the colonial mind: Which body of government, the colonial legislature, or the British Parliament, was the supreme source of authority? Although loyalty to King George III was taught in schools, colonists began to question his authority, especially after the Boston Massacre, on March 5, 1770. The incident aroused much questioning and hatred towards the British soldiers, known as 'lobster backs' who were quartered in Boston. By 1772, a Boston town meeting responded to the Quartering Act, (document D), stating their dissatisfaction with it, and that it was an unconstitutional law. America saw itself as having its own constitution, and that it was their right to disobey any laws that went against it. This type of relationship became more and more clear as time went by, however loyalty to the king remained. Then, by July of 1774, the Intolerable Acts had taken effect, closing down Boston's port to trade, and affecting the trial process in America. As a result, the Bostonians became very angry at parliament, and friction became even more intense. Thomas Jefferson responded blatantly to it, saying that Parliament had finally gone too far when it disallowed Boston to trade. He then turned to the king, as the last hope, saying that it was the king's duty to protect them, (document…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ben Her

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The British began to tax the colonies to get them to help pay for the French and Indian War, which for the most part benefitted those colonies. People in England paid 25-30 times more taxes than the colonists, but the colonies were used to taxing and governing themselves. They made noise about being taxed without being represented but they knew for a fact that representation in Parliament was impossible, owing to the distance and time of travel. At the time, many of the British living in England weren't exactly represented, either; there were plenty of irregularities in the system. But the colonists were extremely well-organized in their efforts to oppose taxation. Boycotts were a common response, since they were easy to organize and hit the British where it hurt the most- the pocketbook. More radial responses, like the Boston Tea Party, were generally condemned.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    April 19 of 1775 would go on to mark history as the day a nation made up of different ideas, cultures, races, and experiences would unionize to become a perfect union under their own control. The events that precede the shots heard around the world near Lexington and Concord would conjure up a sense of rebellion, tension, and irritability. The colonists, whether divided by loyalists, patriots, or neutralist, turn the tide and revolutionize America. Over the course of the twelve years following the Seven Years War the colonist would grow tired of the sentiments of being solely British subjects and at their beck and call. The most prominent reasons that encouraged the colonist to be in favor of separating from the British regime follow: Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, the entitlement for self-governance, and overall…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They felt that they were being taxed without representation, however, English parliament disagreed and said that they were being adequately represented. As colonies of the British government, they were there to serve the mother country and that their representatives were the contributing to parliament for the benefit of the people. It is important to understand both sides to the issues because taxation without representation was one of the reasons that the Revolutionary War began and how these issues affected the world to become what is…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leading up to the Boston Massacre the English were putting taxes on everything. The King of was broke and they are trying to take all of the colonist money. Some of the taxes and punishment the King of England were the Sugar Act, The Proclamation of 1763 and The Stamp Act. This acts made the colonist very angry by taxing important things most people need . They thought awful so they protested and a refused.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction The Battle of Yorktown could be debated as one of the most important Battles in American History. During the period time of the Revolutionary War, we have bread some of the most recognizable leaders in today’s military History. The Battle of Yorktown involved General George Washington’s Continental Army and the French military led by Count Rochambeau. The British Army led by Lord Cornwallis which occupied the all important Yorktown and Gloucester Pointe with the support of hired help from the Germans.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the conflict between the British wanting to collect more revenue, there was no cohesion between the thirteen colonies. After the war, the colonists felt a common bond that hadn’t existed before. The fact that the French were forced to vacate their colonies to Britain also meant that the lands west of the colonies became an attractive incentive for freedom from England. This was of course before the Proclamation of 1763 was put into action. The war greatly affected how the colonists socially interacted because they started to united with one another. The colonists had learned to unite against a common foe, which was Britain. With France removed from North America, the vast interior of the continent lay open for the Americans to colonize, but the English government did otherwise.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Social Studies Alive Chapter 10 it says that the fifth of March, 1770 a troop of redcoats fired at an unarmed group of colonists, killing five. This emphasizes that Great Britain is lacking in protecting the colonies. Moreover, they are even killing the colonists although they should be protecting the colonies after all they have done. In Social Studies Alive Chapter 10 it argues that in 1774, Great Britain closed Boston Harbor. This made many colonists angry and lose their jobs, some even feared they would acquire starvation.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Concord experienced colonial imperialism much differently than those who lived in Boston. Unlike Boston, Concord was not a major port city. It also did not have British regulars present on a daily basis. Concordians had many problems within their own borders they were more concerned with than the events caused by the colonies strained relationship with Britain (Robert A Gross, Minutemen and Their World. Page 10). This is not to say Concord did not take part in colonial activities to protest British imperialism. There were no protests of the magnitude of those that took place in Boston, such as the tea party. Much of the population in Concord remained loyal to the crown. However, the town sent a representative to Boston when needed…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the colonists were breaking British law, the colonists had a right to rebel for they were unfairly taxed without representation and subjected to a king over 3000 miles away. Some people still on both the colonials and the British crown were attempting to avoid a full scale war even after they had begun fighting, like in the Battle of Bunker Hill. Most of the colonists did not want war because these were the people that they had been living with, and protected by the British for over 150 years and the idea of being alone and self governing was hard for the colonists to comprehend and prepare for. Though that was how most felt about the situation at the time, neither side would budge or compromise.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Real power rested in the states. Fearing an overbearing executive and judicial branch due to their experiences with British policy, the drafters of the Articles created a central government that lacked an executive department to carry out and enforce the acts of Congress and no national court system to interpret the meaning of laws. Each state created its own foreign policy, and its own money that might not even be accepted in other states. Due to the war, there was a huge debt and because of the Articles restrictions, congress was not allowed to collect taxes. John Locke, a natural rights philosopher, believed that all human beings were born with ‘natural rights’ that cannot be taken away or toyed with. His ideas influenced the resentment, by the colonists, against the King of Britain who was misusing his power to the colonies disadvantage. Due to the damage done by the Boston Tea Party, parliament issued the Intolerable Acts, which punished colonists for their rebellion. It shut down all legislature and closed the Boston Harbor, ultimately killing their economy. Britain also started to occupy Boston, Massachusetts, purposely to show the colonies who is in charge. Committees of Correspondence was created due to the oppression and was used as a way for the colonies to communicate their grievances, and let everyone know what was happening in each colony. Disgruntlement allowed for increased boycotts on British goods, however things would only worsen. Due to these ideals and events, the colonists quickly settled on the idea of having a weak political structure and influenced the regulations of Congress within the Articles of…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act Crisis

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The colonists needed to show Britain that they were not going to be dictated and told what to do if it wasn't to their advantage. The colonists proceeded to throw protests during political assemblies, they put forth pressure through popular crowd actions and riots, and they boycotted English goods. This gave Parliament a taste of what they were in for in the future when situations of colonial resistance would arise. A more formal way of the colonists' rebellion can be seen through the Stamp Act Congress. As first suggested by James Otis, the Massachusetts legislature issued for a general congress to meet in New York and find ways of resisting the British law. As a result, unity occurred within the colonists, and 27 delegates from nine colonies were sent to the meeting. They drafted a set of resolutions that stood for the colonial attitudes in response to the Stamp Act. Among the resolutions, the congress resolved that since they possessed the rights of all British-born subjects, it was their right not to be taxed without their consent, that no taxes could be imposed against the colonies except by their own assemblies and that they were not properly represented in Parliament. In addition to this, many of the colonies agreed to not purchase any British goods until the Stamp Act was…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stated in history.state.gov," Parliament, said they had the right to tax the American colonies to help pay bills for the war." With that being said they had no choice, no say, and no freedom. In addition, they didn’t have many rights which was unfair. They overall didn’t like the way they were being governed.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The colonists had refused to be ruled by what they had described as a tyrant, which is why they ceased fighting and declared themselves independent. Before the Declaration, the colonists had been withstanding a lot of oppression from their government 3,000 miles away, the British Parliament. Starting with the Proclamation Line of 1763, issued by parliament to prevent the colonies from having war with the surrounding Native Americans, this was one of the first causes that had caused the seed of distrust in the colonists to sprout. Because this Proclamation was issued soon after the French and Indian War, the British were up to their ears in war debt. As a result, the British had passed several acts raising colonial taxes. One of the first of these was the Sugar Act, which had set a tax on sugar purchased in the colonies specifically. The colonies had already been experiencing a multitude of financial difficulties, so a tax act to feed that struggle was indeed a burden. This was soon followed by the Stamp Act, which had placed a tax on every piece of printed paper they had used. The British were very relentless on reasserting their authority over the colonies, however, the colonists are even more so. Boycotting the goods the British taxed, the colonists were successful in…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to living a life without strict rules the colonists felt they were “happy under Great Britain” and only wanted to be presented with “the choice of independency” (Otis). When the French and Indian War ended, the relationship between the American colonists and Great Britain slowly started to deteriorate. The different acts started to expose the British American colonies to the fact that they were under “full power and authority” of Great Britain (Declaratory Act). After the war, the colonists were forced to pay for the remaining troops lodging, but they found this to be unfair since there was not a need for them. American colonies had to rely on Great Britain for their goods and supplies to be imported to them, but then Great Britain decided to add taxes to these imported items.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays