Preview

How Did Lenin Add To Imperialism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1016 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Lenin Add To Imperialism
October 17, 2010

Chapter 17 (13-24) History Part II/B … Russian Revolution

Citation: from "A History of the Modern World" by R.R Palmer

13. Explain Lenin’s view on the “party”? Lenin’s view on the “party”: He demanded strong authority at the top, by which the central committee would determine the doctrine (or “party line”) and control personnel at all levels of the organization. He thought the party would strengthen itself by purges, expelling all but the most fundamental disagreements. He stood for the rigid reaffirmation of Marxian ideas and fundamentals- dialectical materialism and irreconcilable class struggle.

14. What did Lenin add to Marxism? He developed and transformed it into a first-rank element of Marxism certain theories of “imperialism” and of the “uneven development of capitalism, that is captilism that
…show more content…
Describe the Reforms of Stolypin: His aim was to build up the propertied classes as friends of the state. He believed that a state actively supported by widespread private property had little to fear from doctrinaire intellectuals, conspirators, and emigrants. He therefore favored and broadened the powers of the provincial zemstvos, in which the larger landowners took part in administering local affairs. For the peasantry he put through legislation more sweeping than any since the Emancipation. He wanted to replace the ancient institution with a regime of private individual property. He abolished what was left of the redemption payments for which the mirs had been collectively rights and to leave the common at will. He authorized peasants to buy land freely from the communes, from each other, or from the gentry. He thus favored the rise of the class of “big farmers,” the later kulaks who obtained control of large tracts, worked them with hired help, and produced cash crops for the market. He created a mobile labor force and a food supply raised by big farmers, which advanced the industrialization of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the years 1906 – 1914, Peter Stolypin was pushing to de – revolutionise the peasantry and put into place economic reform, and there is evidence of this working. During these years large amounts of agricultural reform were set in motion. In 1906 45.9 million tonnes of agricultural production was produced, by 1913 this had grown significantly to 61.7 million tonnes. The massive change in the amount of product shows that agricultural and therefore economic reform had taken place. Farmers, at this time, had also started paying higher taxes, which is sign of higher income, again strengthening this idea of economic reform occurring. Stolypin, however successful he was in his endeavours, was pushing fiercely for a more independent and de-revolutionised peasantry. During November 1906, huge action was taken to change the way the peasants lived. They were freed from the constraints of commune control and land banks were set up to give money to those peasants who chose to leave. Many were also encouraged to move to Siberia, all of these reforms were starting to lay a foundation for a more independent peasantry. Economic reform was being pursued desperately by members of the government such as Stolypin, this can been seen by the copious amount of law, for example peasants leaving commune control, being put into place. The fact these laws were coming about shows that Russia was undergoing economic reform to some extent during this period, whether it was successful or not.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agriculture was a crucial area which needed to be reformed if Russia was to ever be modernised. At the root of the inherently backward Russia was the peasant workforce, who mainly worked in the agricultural sector, which left Russia a world away from other European Countries in terms of industry. ‘Out of the 60 million people in European Russia in 1855, 50 million were peasant serfs’1; this was a huge obstacle to modernisation as it limited. The goal of Emancipation was to release the peasants from the land that they were bound to in order to create an industrial workforce that would drive modernisation. The predominantly agricultural workforce would now work in factories thus changing Russia into an industrial juggernaut, which would be key in modernising Russia. The reform was also crucial as it was the first step in the deconstruction of the Ancien Regime within Russia. Emancipation was key in establishing support for the monarchy, ‘in other countries Serf emancipation took place as a consequence of social and organic change’2, this meant that in Russia the monarchy had…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ender's Game is author Orson Scott Card's best-known work. The novel has sold over one million copies and is published worldwide (Whyte). The novel won the Hugo and Nebula award in 1986; science fiction’s most prestigious writing awards (University of Utah). In summary, the plot of the novel is a story about a young child, Ender Wiggin, taken away from his family by the International Fleet (a world order devoted to protecting the planet from space invaders) in order to train him to be a military genius to defend the human race from an alien species (Buggers) that has already attacked Earth twice. At the end of the novel Ender kills the entire bugger race but does not know it until after the defeat because he believes he is participating in a simulation (Card 296). Since its first publication in 1985 the book has been considered a science fiction classic (Kessel 1). Card, who has a master's degree in literature from the University of Utah, has continued to write at a rapid pace producing five other parts to the Ender series in addition to creating several new series, short stories, and a handful of other novels (Whyte). The sequel to Ender's Game, Speaker for the Dead, won the Hugo and Nebula awards in 1987. (Whyte). In considering the novel’s prestige and circulation, an academic discussion should be taken seriously in uncovering and drawing out ideologies within the novel. It is important to compare and contrast these ideologies back to our current culture’s ideologies; because through this analysis a synthesis will develop in understanding if this novel reinforces our culture’s current ideologies or challenges them or both. Lastly the discussion will be able highlight why this does or does not matter when considering positive and negative outcomes of either reinforcing culture or defying it.…

    • 3562 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin was important to the Bolshevik seizure of power as he was able to manipulate public opinion using slogans and propaganda. This was also shown early in the year, before Lenin's return to Russia from Switzerland. The Bolsheviks in Russia had printed in 'Pravda' (their newspaper) that their members and followers should support the Provisional Government, and also that they had given serious thought to the idea of combining with the Mensheviks. This was all very contrary to what Lenin wrote in his 'April Theses' which clearly laid out his views and beliefs on the subject. A key point of his 'April Theses' was "No Support for the Provisional Government", yet without him his party were proposing just that. Lenin as an individual was able to force the Bolsheviks to follow his beliefs and goals and without him they may never have chosen this course of action at all. Through his April thesis, particularly the slogans “Peace, Bread, Land” and “All Power to the Soviets”, he was able to harness the support of the Russian people.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    socialists and Lenin but failed. Unconsciously, Kornilov brought back the Bolshevicks on the scene of the Russian Revolution. The picture of Kornilov, shows him in front of his army ready to attack Petrograde as the photograph was taken in summer 1917. He looks determined but his army looks small and quite weak compared to the Bolshevik's troops and the Kerensky's troops. The fact that the Bolsheviks helped Kerensky only restored the Bolsheviks as patriots in the eyes of the Russians and enabled them to continue their plan to seize power.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part 1 Stalin Myth Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He argues that under Lenin was a “collectable leadership” with which they discussed political strategy. Stalin was power-hungry who repressed those who would stand up for their opinion, he didn't listen to the people and attacked those who supported him. Using the idea of “Enemy of the people” to justify his actions.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although there is much controversy over Lenin’s actions during his regime the debate continues as to what kind of leader he was. It can be said that Lenin used propaganda to promote his rise to power Propaganda was useful when the party had gained power, to both inform people about the new regime, and about why they had taken power. Lenin influenced the people with promises. He made three promises he thought were important to the people Peace, Land, Bread. Promise number one: Ending Russia’s affiliation with World War I. Coincidently, this was the only promise he kept.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin’s actions are justified by Marxist ideology because they successfully reduced the class antagonism in the Russian society. Marx believes that there is a class struggle between the most distinctive and broad classes in the society (bourgeoisie and workers) which creates the base of a constant conflict that has escalated many times throughout the past centuries: “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and slave, ..., in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on ... open fight, that each time ended, either in the revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes. The unity of the…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Depression and Fascism

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Lenin was a Marxist. He preached that private property should be abolished and that everything should be owned by everyone. He also believed that anybody making profit was abusing everybody else and that the Russian government supported a system that kept the huge majority of Russian people in misery and therefore it should be overthrown.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. This relates to the previous reading by going into deeper detail about the outcomes of Marxism by also comparing to social constructivism, clarifying that a nation’s environment in which it acts, is social, ideational, and…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the five characters of the imperialism, V.I. Lenin built the theory of imperialism by the Marxism’s basic stand, viewpoint and methods, which defined the imperialism as a special historical stage of the capitalism. His concept of imperialism contained that imperialism was the capitalist monopolies and parasitic and moribund capitalism.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays