Locke believes in the property of the world for every human being, and the property of the body to oneself. Whatever is done with that body belongs to that body. But that transfers over to what that body experiences, and what it touches, and when. So, I do believe that there are facts to what is what, and what belongs to who based on simple question of what is done with each body. He says at the very end of chapter five in the second treaty, "...what portion a man carved to himself, was easily seen; and it was useless as well as dishonest to carve himself too much..." (302). The words useless and dishonest stood out for me, because if it is so useless, then why do people continue to carve more for themselves in more instances than one? And if it is to be dishonest, who is it hurting personally if one takes more for themselves? Those who have less? There is a class system. The proletariat relinquishes what they have to become a part of a class, and a mindset for the better. The savage homo-sapien relinquishes their violent way for a mindset of peace. This being said, there are those who give up, and those who are left to take what is given up. Locke believed in a system, and in that system there are going to be those who make things happen, and those who benefit from those things happening. If you make things happen then you are more likely to receive the benefits from it. Most who put in the work are better off in…