Preview

How an Individual’s Power, Money, and or Socioeconomic Status Can Affect the Justice Administered to Them by the United States Judicial Branch.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How an Individual’s Power, Money, and or Socioeconomic Status Can Affect the Justice Administered to Them by the United States Judicial Branch.
How an individual’s power, money, and or socioeconomic status can affect the justice administered to them by the United States judicial branch.

The Judicial Branch of the United States government is an extremely important factor in the success of today’s society, without it, society would have no standard of order and things would be completely and utterly chaotic! As a matter of fact no country would be complete without a Judicial Branch or some type of government in place because it is mandatory in the successful and smooth running of a civilized society. As Aristotle, the famous Greek philosopher, once stated, “At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst.” What is the Judicial Branch? The general purpose of the judicial branch is to hear cases, interpret federal law, including the Constitution, and administer fair justice to all United States Citizens. The Judicial Branch consists of the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts. In the majority of cases the Judicial Branch administers fair justice to all, after all, the law requires it to, and the National Pledge of Allegiance promises that the United States is “…One Nation under God with liberty and justice for all.” Sadly, there have been some cases passed through the judicial system in which the involved parties did not receive fair justice. Usually, in these rare cases, the court decision is unfairly and or negatively influenced by other factors. More specifically, some judicial rulings have been affected for the worse by the participating parties’ power, socioeconomic status, and/or money.
John Grisham in his legal thriller, The Pelican Brief, gives a fictional, yet realistic example of how a government official used his power to influence the Judicial System. Basically two Supreme Court justices were murdered and no one knew why or who did it. A law student named Darby Shaw writes a brief about who she suspects is the killer and in the long run, she



Cited: 1. http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Scott/. 2. The Pelican Brief Grisham, John 3. http://tempknak.home.att.gov/RITC.html 4. United States Constitution Bill of Rights (http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Since the days of Chief Justice John Marshall, The Supreme Court has been the arbiter of constitutionality among the three branches of government. Through this judicial review, The Supreme Court has become the bastion of The Constitution. In the current case of Zivotofsky v. Kerry, the very checks and balances that hold the triarchy of American government stable are bearing inspection. Fomented in a small passage of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 2002 with, “for purposes of the registration of birth, certification of nationality, or issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in the city of Jerusalem, the Secretary shall, upon the request of the citizen or the citizen’s legal guardian, record the place of birth as Israel”…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    <html><head></head><body><p>In a nation of democratic governance, the United States has unquestionably succeeded in its own development and potency since the establishment of the Constitution. The United States was founded in hopes of having a truly free, full functioning society. In order to achieve such a goal, the framers of this country drafted the Constitution brilliantly and attentively. With the creation of the three branches, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, the Constitution also created checks and balances, the capability for each branch to check the power of the others. To ensure the continuing proficiency of our democratic nation and "checks and balances" system, it is crucial to equalize the branches by separating, and equally distributing power among the three branches. However, before 1803, the judicial branch was lacking such said power over the legislative and executive branches. It was not until the case of Marbury v. Madison that Chief Justice Marshall justified the power of judicial review to the judiciary branch, finally obtaining equal leverage among the legislative and executive branches. With the implementation of judicial review, the U.S. Supreme Court has jurisdiction and authority to strike down law, overturn executive acts, and legally bind a public official to properly carry out constitutional duties. Indisputably, the practice of judicial review is the main power of the United States Supreme Court to date.</p>…

    • 1489 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Branch of the United States is network of courts that interprets and applies laws. Though they generally do not create laws, they decipher them and apply them to a certain case. One of the powers of the judiciary is the power to declare laws unconstitutional. Under the system of Checks and Balances, this main check that the judiciary has on both the legislative and executive branch is the power of judicial review. This power allows the Supreme Court to examine and compare acts undertaken by Congress (legislative branch) and the executive branch and invalidate them in both federal and state governments. Essentially, this means that the Court can overturn any move by state law or Congress if the Court is under the belief that an…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Johnnie Cochran

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Johnnie Cochran was an infamous American lawyer, who gained recognition from his highly publicized and controversial cases as a successful defense attorney. Born as an African-American on October 2, 1937 in Shreveport, Louisiana, Cochran grew up facing extreme racial prejudice and learned valuable life experience at a young age (Cochran Biography 1). Turning a deaf ear to discrimination, Cochran did well in school and got good grades. His father and mother always stressed education, and Cochran learned to apply himself at various public schools (Cochran Biography 1). His ability to succeed was, in part, due to a more accepting community in Los Angeles, where Cochran spent most of his later childhood (Cochran 12). Johnnie Cochran was not poor by any standards; his dad had a stable and well-paying job in life insurance (Cochran Biography 1). However, Cochran was known to envision himself with more money and the possibilities thereafter. He would often befriend richer classmates in order to experience a more luxurious lifestyle (Cochran Biography 1). Johnnie Cochran understood that hard work and his natural people skills allowed him to integrate well with his rich friends. Unaware of his wildly, successful future, Cochran would first have to discover a field in which his skills and opportunities could be utilized. Johnnie Cochran’s adherence to the 10,000 hour rule, his exposure to meaningful work, and his ability to express what he wanted all support Gladwell’s theory of what defines an outlier. Without these qualities, Johnnie Cochran would have never been one of America’s best lawyers. Furthermore, the opportunities that allowed Cochran to achieve and acknowledge these qualities provided him with the proud status of a unique outlier.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States Judicial branch is an inefficient branch of government. It consists of one chief justice, eight associate justices. Once appointed by the president they can only be removed from office by death, impeachment, or retirement. The current system today is still the slow inefficient branch that it was when it was founded over 223 years ago. The duties include the following: “Interpreting state laws, settling legal disputes, determining the innocence of an individual, punishing violators of the law, hearing civil cases, and checking the powers of the legislative and executive branch”(The White House).…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    constitution as well as laws. This branch is responsible for overseeing the court system of the U.S. The judicial branch consists of all courts, but more importantly the Supreme Court. All other courts differ from the Supreme courts simply because the Supreme Court rules whether something is constitutional or unconstitutional. This is why the Supreme Court is the head of the Judicial branch. This branch also has the power to review lower-courts decisions. In order to keep the Executive branch in check the Judicial branch has the ability to declare executive decisions unconstitutional. In addition the Judicial branch maintains order in reference to the Legislative branch by declaring law that are unconstitutional.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the six main focuses In the preamble of the United States Constitution is “to establish justice" The framers included this to set up a reasonable and unbiased system of laws where it doesn’t matter what the persons race, religion, gender, or financial status is. Established Justice means that our government makes decisions to fix problems among citizens and our community, where one is treated justly and equally and is perhaps assured that their rights are respected by others. Today the Constitution gives the job to the federal system of courts and the Supreme Court. As Stated in ARTICLE III SECTION 1 “The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish”. The federal court has many issues to take care off. The federal court has to listen to the cases concerning the constitution, treaties, national laws, and of course settle disputes between states and individuals. The Supreme Court however has more power and can rule a law passed by congress. During 1787 many people were concern about injustice and unfairness of laws and trade. Many of those people wanted a nation that was uniform. That is why the constitution was made, and the preamble makes establish justice a key component to help people and citizens of…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The nation’s founding fathers recognized; almost predicted this potential danger and considered the fairness and rights so important that they drafted an equal branch of power in the Constitution focused on this idea. The Judicial Branch was created for the clarification and enforcement of the law, the Executive and Legislative branches to ensure that every citizen would have equal rights and receive equal treatment. Law enforcement ensures that laws are being obeyed, judges ensure that those who violate the law are punished fairly, and attorneys ensure that everyone has a…

    • 1155 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will discuss Texas v. Hopwood, 518 U.S. 1033 (1996), Affirmative Action, the 14th Amendment in relation to how the judicial activism comes back to questions of judicial power.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States has the largest documented incarceration rate in the world. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics at yearend 2012, approximately 6,937,600 offenders were under the supervision of adult correctional systems (2013). Of this number, more than 60% of the inmates in prison are minorities however; they make up only 37% of the United States population. Considering the trends in which minorities commit crimes, such broad statistics conceal that racial disparities pervade each stage of the U.S. judicial system, from arrest to trial and sentencing.…

    • 5238 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Numerous study have found widespread racial bias in US criminal justice system. A new report issued by a coalition of civil rights organizations calls the "massively and pervasively biased" treatment on blacks and Hispanics by the US police and courts the major civil rights problem of the twenty-first century entitled "Justice on Trial : Racial Disparities in the American Criminal Justice System." The study finds that minorities in the US face discriminatory treatment at every stage of the judicial process, from arrest to incarceration. The 95 page report was issued by the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights based in Washington DC. It's findings show that blacks, Hispanics and other minorities face unfair targeting by police and other law enforcement officials, racially biased charging and plea bargaining decisions by prosecutors and discriminatory…

    • 641 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial branch of government depicts the meaning of laws and applies them to the states. It also resolves disputes and has the power to change laws through judicial review. If the review deems the laws incompatible they may annul them. In the United States, this branch oversees the court system. The Supreme Court is the highest court of America and is the head of the Judicial Branch. This court rules whether or not something constitutional. The judges are nominated by the President and approved by the Senate. There are no term limits and no other court can overrule them.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. The term “judiciary is also used to refer collectively to the personnel, such as judges, magistrates and other adjudicators, who form the core of a judiciary (sometimes referred to as a “bench”), as well as the staffs who keep the system running smoothly. In 1803, Marbury vs Madison case reviewed in the Supreme Court confirmed the legal principle of judicial review demonstrating the ability of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional in the new nation.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Checks and Balances

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As established by the constitution, there are 3 branches in the United States government. The three branches are the legislative branch which makes the law, the judicial branch which interprets the law and the executive branch which executes the law. When congress created these branches, they also created a system. This system was called “checks and balances”. “Each branch has powers that it can use to check and balance the operations and power of the other two branches.” With this system, each of the three branches can limit the powers of the others. Congress created this system to help ensure that no branch became too powerful. Each branch has powers that can be used to “check and balance the operations and power of the other two branches.” For example, in the constitution in articles 1, 2 and 3, it states the powers of the branches and implies how those branches can check and balance the other 2. A good example of checks and balances would be the process of how laws are made. First the legislature branch has the power to introduce and vote for the bill. Then the bill goes to the executive branch where the president can decide if the bill is good for the country. If he does think that the bill is good for the country, then he signs it and it becomes a law. If he doesn’t think the bill is good for the country then he veto’s it but the legislature branch can have another chance. “With enough votes, the legislative branch can override the executive branch's veto, and the bill becomes a law.” Once when it becomes a law, the judicial branch is in charge. Then people of the country then test it through the court system. If someone thinks that the law is unfair, they can fill a law suit. Then lawyers make their arguments and the judge decides which side is more convincing. The side that did lose can appeal to higher court and can eventually reach the Supreme Court. “If the legislative branch does not agree with the way in which the judicial branch has interpreted the…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays