Preview

Judicial Power And Activism Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
928 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judicial Power And Activism Paper
Judicial Power and Activism
Amanda Smith
Southern New Hampshire University
Courts and the Judicial Process
JUS-602-Q2714 Courts and Judicial Process 15TW2
Jennifer Schneider
December 14, 2014
Abstract

In this paper I will discuss Texas v. Hopwood, 518 U.S. 1033 (1996), Affirmative Action, the 14th Amendment in relation to how the judicial activism comes back to questions of judicial power.
Judicial Power and Activism
Let me first point out that no one man is better than the other. Human life has no color only skin in its various shades. The Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution at times is interpreted out of the original context that it was intended in my opinion. Despite the students in this law suit are …show more content…
This is definitely a big issue in making judicial rulings with constitutionality involved and especially the continued existence of separation of powers. Affirmative action is a policy in place often used by educational intuitions as well as employers with the intent of giving preference or equal access to employment and or education to members in certain minority groups deemed to have or had been discriminated against (ex. African-Americans, Hispanics, Women). This policy was in place with the enactment of Executive Order 10925, by President John F. Kennedy March 6, …show more content…
Despite the obvious that justices chief function is to interpret the law this decision rewrote by overturn Bakke. Judicial activities comes back to judicial power for justices are in the position to use jurisdiction, Certiorari, as well as Injunctive authority to make decision with in turn effect public policy for case law is a form of primary authority. I could see how it appears that this decision was judicial activism. Generally speaking precedent weighs heavily in deciding cases of similar issues/questions of law presented. Stare decisis is typically followed with no deviance from the way the statue is interpreted however, in this case it seems that the Justice Ginsburg decided on some other factors besides the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism
    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism

    Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…

    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Loving V. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)
    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Loving V. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: The Liberals Against Affirmative Action
    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography: The Liberals Against Affirmative Action

    This article sheds light on the last affirmative action case which was 10 years ago. The article goes into detail about the 13 page dissent that Justice Anthony M. Kennedy issued after the ruling. The article also talks about whether or not colleges should be allowed to take race into consideration so that they can have diverse classes.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Brown V. Board Of Education Of Topek Case Study
    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Brown V. Board Of Education Of Topek Case Study

    the black students were not equal under the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause. The Court…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs Arizona
    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Miranda vs Arizona

    The Warren Court from 1953 until 1969 established luminary rights with its liberal interpretation, and as some say “ judicial policy making”, such as the “right to privacy” Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479(1965), “separate but equal is not constitutional” Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) and the definitive protection of rights in the Miranda decision.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Branch Research Paper
    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judicial Branch Research Paper

    The Judicial Branch is the most important branch of the United States government, due to the significant role it plays in interpreting and determining if laws are constitutional. Even though the Judicial Branch is the smallest in size and has smallest budget of any branch in our nation’s government, it exercises enormous power and is equal to other branches of the government because it has the power of Judicial Review. Judicial Review is the review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Branch Research Paper
    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Judicial Branch Research Paper

    A docket is a court’s calendar that shows the schedule of cases is to hear.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Affirmative Inaction: Colored College Admissions
    • 2888 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Affirmative Inaction: Colored College Admissions

    “President Kennedy, as a way to fight discrimination, first coined the term Affirmative Action in 1961. Later on President Johnson employed Affirmative Action as a means of “a more profound stage of the battle for civil rights . . . not just equality as a right and a theory, but equality as a fact and result”” (“Background on Affirmative Action.”). Over the past few decades Affirmative Action has grown out of where it originated from and been altered to the extent where it has lost touch with its original intent. A prime example of the misuse of Affirmative Action can be seen in the college admissions process. The arguments against Affirmative Action fall into two categories. First Affirmative Action is immoral and causes individuals to act in an immoral manner, and second, rather than positive consequences Affirmative Action has a net negative consequence on individuals. The removal of Affirmative Action programs in colleges will lead to a colorblind admissions process that is fair to all races. The use of law enforcement could ensure that minorities are not discriminated against in the…

    • 2888 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century
    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century

    "[The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” Hamilton explained when analyzing the Judiciary’s initial intent. Article 3 section 1 of the Constitution grants the Supreme court “The judicial Power of the United States.” this power can be given to inferior courts such as circuit and district courts as “Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Later, in article 3 section 2, the Judicial branch is granted power that “extend[s] to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.” The Judicial branch has explicit power to interpret the intent of past laws, treaties made, and…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Analysis
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Analysis

    The Supreme Court was presented with the case of Fischer vs. The University of Texas where Abigail Fisher was suing the University for discrimination in their affirmative action based admissions process. The Supreme Court voted 7-1 and ruled to send the case back to the lower courts for further review and put off making any final decisions to change the U.S. policy on affirmative action, a “longstanding but fragile societal compromise, one that forbids quotas but allows using race as one factor among many in the admissions process” (Laptik). Both articles discussed in length the constitutionality of the race-based admissions process as well as explaining the Supreme Court’s position on the matter. The justices made statements that explained that the admissions programs must be subject to strict scrutiny where the it can be determined that classification based on gender, race and ethnicity occurs for the sole purpose of creating a diverse student population. The programs that use affirmative action in public universities are being scrutinized to ensure that their methods are a means to an end and serve to create diversity only. This issue will come before the Supreme Court again in the future and there will most likely be a more permanent ruling on the matter.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Study

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay
    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Judicial Branch Essay

    In American Constitutional thought, it is generally regarded that the Judicial Branch and the courts should be independent from political sway. The Legislative and Executive branches were designed to represent the will of the people at the time, but the third branch is to remain isolated. Blatantly activist judges are generally regarded as unacceptable. It’s undeniable, however, that a completely independent judiciary is impossible in a democratic society. To some extent, the general populace plays a role in interpreting Constitutions, which is referred to as popular constitutionalism. To what extent the general populace plays in the interpretation of the Constitution is still debated and the answer may vary from country to country. For this…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 14th Amendment
    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On 14th Amendment

    Throughout the years many other cases against racial, disability, sexual orientation and other forms of discrimination have been won using the equal protection clause. During a time in our country where many people feel that the 14th amendment is not being upheld, it is important to look back at the progress the country has made by advocating for the equal rights of all people. Many are still searching for equal protection amongst their state government. With the continued rise of discrimination by law enforcement, the growing number of minorities in prison, and the low number of minorities obtaining post-secondary degrees, the 14th amendment does not seem to be fulfilled at times. Just like Plessy v. Ferguson found a way around the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, many of the laws and policies that are enforced in today’s time have maneuvered their way around the 14th amendment. The county has come a long way from its Jim Crow era but the country still has work to do in order to ensure all people are treated equal and provided the same liberties as all other…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Equal Protection Law Of The Fourteenth Amendment
    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    Equal Protection Law Of The Fourteenth Amendment

    The two parties had very different perspectives on the case. The African American's found the law violating the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The equal protection law of the fourteenth amendment is set in place so a state cannot treat one individual differently than another individual. The amendment grants equal protection to everyone. Although, the court ruled that the fourteenth amendment was only to, "create absolute equality of the races before the law". This law included that everyone was granted political and civil rights. But, these rights only extended so far. The African American population stated they did not have any social rights. Justice John Marshall Harlan spoke siding with the African Americans, saying…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism Versus Judicial Restraint
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Judicial Activism Versus Judicial Restraint

    I believe Judicial Activism should be removed from the Supreme Court. The Original definition of Judicial Activism is defined as a philosophy of judicial decision- making whereby judges allow their personal views about public policies, among other factors, to guide their decisions. To me this is basically an important decision biased due to emotions. Which I believe is totally unfair and unconstitutional. There are many cases where people have argued that the jurors/judges have been too activist in their decisions and used too much of their personal views in deciding a case. An example of this would be Roe Vs Wade, where abortion was the concerned cause. The Supreme Court ruled that abortion must be legal to protect the women’s health and privacy. So with that being the case, the Judge eventually ruled that it was unconstitutional for the government or anyone else to intervene in someone else’s personal affairs or problems. Or even a better example the Lawrence vs. Texas case where the Supreme Court ruled that consensual homosexual sex was legal and protected by the constitution and is considered to be personal liberty.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics