Preview

Hospital Governing Boards

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
814 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hospital Governing Boards
7. “Patient self-determination and autonomy are under the law ancillary and derivative from the well-articulated right of privacy. Under this well established right, procreative freedom, the right to refuse any medical care no matter how beneficial, the right to terminate one’s life and legal immunity for doctors supporting or implementing such patient desires are all set out with clarity.” Accept or reject with specific examples.
I completely agree with this statement, patients have the freedom and the right to refuse and or decide for or against a treatment against the doctors will. It will be ethically inhumane and immoral to force anyone to get a treatment against their will. At the same time, there are times when this might not be appropriate measure for example when a third party is at risk, a perfect example of this would be the recent outbreak of EBOLA. A patient exhibiting the symptoms and signs may refuse the treatment, but in order to protect the public from the deadly virus, doctors may order the patient to be quartintied and treated. Furthermore if a terminally ill patient wants to end their life rather than prolonging their suffering they may choose to in designated states, a perfect example of this would Brittany Maynard, who was a 30year old female from California who was suffering from brain cancer and wanted to end her life rather than suffer with the aid of . Since it was illegal in California for her to do this, she moved to Oregon where she ended her life way the method of physician-assisted suicide. In my opinion once the quality of life for an individual has deteriorated to the point where pain is almost. We should all have the freedom of choice at this time
4. What is meant by the term “standard of care” in the context of medical liability? Provider examples as to the application of this legal term. How is this standard determined and defined in the health care field? Are you satisfied that it protects both patients and health care

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Hs101 Unit 2 Case Study

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Define “standard of care.” How would appropriate “standard of care” be determined in this case?…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Schwartz, Robert. “Autonomy, Futility, and Limits of Medicine.” Bioethics: principles, issues, and cases-2nd ed. Lewis, Vaughn. New York: Oxford 2013, 2010. 105-108. Print…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine you're bedridden, unable to move, and every breath you take fills your body with pain. Would you prefer to stay alive unable to move or would you choose the option to end the suffering? Physician assisted suicide should be a legal option for dying patients, because the benefits are worth the cost. People should have the right to choose their fate, it's their life they have the right to choose.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physicians who are in favor of Euthanasia state that to keep Euthanasia or assisted suicide illegal is violation of the patient freedoms. They believe that any competent terminally ill patient should have the right to choose death or refuse life-saving treatments. The U.S.Constution does not state that the government can keep a person from committing suicide. If Euthanasia was a right, patients could die with dignity and leave others with a positive memory and not what they had become. However, many physicians and medical staff have numerous reasons for prohibition the legalization of Voluntary Euthanasia. The main argument is the notation of the Hippocratic Oath that some doctors take by being part of a (PSA) and prescribing a lethal dosage of a drug could weaken the doctor-patient relationship because of the oath some doctors…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should physicians be granted the power to intentionally end the lives of their patients? Recent proposals to legalize physician-assisted suicide have raised this question and triggered intense legal, medical and social debate. For some individuals, the debate is fueled by their fear that medical technology may someday keep them alive past the time of natural death. However, this concern is unfounded for mentally competent adults who have a legal right to refuse or stop any medical treatment. It is also important to recognize that today's health care climate lends itself more to undertreatment than overtreatment.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A patient should have the liberty of choosing to end their suffering. Although, it may see has an extreme option, is an option the patient should have the right. However, some doctor think that Physician-Assisted Suicide goes against the oath they made. According to the article” Doctor-Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List”, one of the con of this practice is “Violates the Hippocratic Oath”. Which was that every life is sacred, therefore, commanding respect. So, just because the patients give permission, doesn’t make killing right. Still, by respecting the patient’s wishes and taking him/her out of his/her misery, the doctor is respecting their life. Physician-Assisted Suicide helps the patients in many different ways like being prepare or ending their suffering. Physician-assisted Suicide helps them retain their dignity. Terminally ill, coma, or mentally competent patients are suffering every day. For some, the pain is so much, that they don’t consider themselves “living”. Physician-assisted suicide help patients properly said goodbye to their love ones at their own pace and at their own comfort. It gives them the opportunity to be surrounded by the people they love and the things they love. An article called “Doctor-Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List” by Nyln.org, it stated that “Physician-Assisted Suicide makes grief easier to handle” (Nyln). Since, everyone its inform of the patient’s…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician assisted dying is a very controversial issue and it is only becoming more controversial with more cases coming to light. Many people believe that assisting a patient in dying goes against the moral code that doctors should follow. Their job is to go to any measures to sustain the life under their care, but what about individuals suffering with no hope of getting better? Wouldn’t doctors then be obligated morally to relieve these individuals of their agony and put them to peace? Considering that, some argue in favor of the sick and believe they deserve a voice and a right to choose how much suffering is enough suffering. Should someone who is suffering from a terminal illness that…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree that the right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid any unnecessary excruciating pain seems as though it should be a basic human right. To have someone go through more suffering than absolutely necessary seems as though it would fall under the description of an inhumane act, and frankly an injustice against the basic human right of bodily autonomy and integrity. Due to these almost undeniable arguments, physician assisted suicide, in many cases, is seen as a basic human right that we need to be granted access to. Activists argue that it is simply an additional choice that we will be able to make, and that it will surely never be pushed onto anybody or used sinisterly (Maynard 2014). Although this claim is something that we cannot be entirely sure of, as I have continued to research the pros and cons behind physician assisted suicide, I have come to the conclusion that in many cases it truly does seem that the legalization of physician assisted suicide is the best option for everyone involved. It is a means to cease any unnecessary suffering that a person may be going though, and provides a sense of comfort for them during a time in their lives where they are not given many choices besides to deal with what they are going through and try to survive. Additionally, with many of the extreme medical advancements of the 20t century, our goals have been clouded by the quest to…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why should doctors, lawmakers, ethicists, or anyone else claim to know what is best for them? They don’t know what the person is going through, or how much they are suffering. The patients go through all the needle pokes, side effects, and weaknesses. It is their decision; they have the right to decide what to do with their life. Why have a person who is suffering lie in bed waiting to die? What is the good thing about that? They are not enjoying their life; they have a sudden hope of just dying. That intentionally becomes the thing they’d most wish upon anything. There have been many cases where families began to notice their loved ones suffering and fought for the right to remove them from life support. Although, the government began granting families wishes in 1990, only 4 out of 5 people would be granted the wish to die. In order for the government to consider patients for assisted suicide they wanted evidence from the patient. They wanted to make sure that this is what the patient desired. "Because it is impossible to know how much another person is suffering, only the dying patient can make such a serious decision. “If there was no proof of a patients wish to die the government would not grant the families wishes.”(Torr). This is why the most important requirement for euthanasia to be justified is that the dying patient specifically requests it" (Torr). "The central question…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Our nation was founded on the principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” -Leonard Boswell. In the constitution it states the concept that everyone have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness therefore, you get to decide if you want to live or not. For people that are terminally ill, or have less than six months to live,they have options. They can do, doctor assisted suicide, euthanasia, or they can suffer until they pass away. When using doctor assisted suicide or euthanasia, the patient doesn't have to suffer, or continue suffering until they die. Doctor assisted suicide and euthanasia are an efficient way to (1) end people's suffering, (2) euthanasia doesn’t end lives early, it prevents them from seeing…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terminal illnesses cause great pain and suffering. For example here are some words from Andy Whelan, “...we as parents could offer no comfort - Jessica pushing us away as she rode out her searing pain in solitude...her body stiffened and her face contorted in pain.” (Zhang). Mrs. Whelan’s daughter Jessica Whelan was only four years old when she was diagnosed. Jessica had a form of cancer called neuroblastoma and had been fighting cancer for 13 months. In November she was given just a few weeks to live and later died due to cancer. Patients should be allowed to have doctor-assisted suicides because they should have the right to die and end their suffering, but some people are against the legalization because they believe they will make the…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that euthanasia is a patient’s right. According to ProCon.org, “… a terminally ill person has a protected liberty interest in choosing to end intolerable suffering by bringing about his or her own death” (ProCon.org, “Top 10 Pros and Cons”). Claiming that everyone has the right to choose their death. The website also went deeper into the matter by bringing the Hippocratic Oath, “do no harm” (ProCon.org, “Top 10 Pros and Cons”). It…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Currently, in the United States, 12% of states, including Vermont, Oregon, and California have legalized the Right to Die. This debate around whether or not to help patients who have terminal illness end their lives has been and is still far from over. The definition of Right to Die is, “an individual who has been certified by a physician as having an illness or physical condition which can be reasonably be expected to result in death in 24 months or less after the date of the certification” (Terminally Ill Law & Legal Definition 1). With this definition, the Right to Die ought to be available to any person that is determined terminally ill, as determined by a professional.…

    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should we prolong life or die with dignity? This question has long been an issue in the united states. Calling for more laws to implicate when a patient should be allowed to denie life saving interventions. When ones faite has been determined and that faite being that, that person will soon die, we should not prolong the death by artificial means. Doctors are taught to save lives and with that mentality, when it comes time to pull the plug, doctor are not willing to do so without feeling that they are giving up on their patients. This in my eyes, is torture. Torture because the patient is being held back from being at peace. Know one wants to live in uncontroled pain and suffering. Id rather my life be over quick and painlessly rather then lay in a hospital bed feeling hopeless and sorry for myself, and see the pitty of others close to me. But unforunatly this is how people are dying. And the number one cause of this, is because in most cases their are no liviving wills in place, no communication between doctors and patients, patients wishes aren't being met when family members are trying hard not to let go, and when doctors give false predictions. I stress the importance of living wills and communication with doctors as to how ones life should end. Whose life is it anyway? Its own own life and we should have a plan in place for how we want to be treated in our dying…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays