Preview

Hoistory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
623 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hoistory
Mansabdari System
The term Mansab literally means the rank of its holder (Mansabdars) in the official ladder in the Mughal system of administration. From that angle the Mansabdars were the paid-service officers of the Mughals. On the basis of merit or service to the state, Mansabs were given to both civil and military officers and hence they formed an integral part of the Mughal bureaucracy. The Mansabdars could be transferred from the civil to the military department and vice versa. The Mansabdars had to supply certain bnumber of soldiers to the state according to their rank. In the time of Akbar the Mansabdars were classified into 33 grades, from commanders of 10 to 10,000 soldiers. Generally Mansab of rank of 7,000 and above was reserved for person like princes or other members of royal family. There were two important characteristic features. Firstly, in broader sense all the Mansabdars were subordinated to the king. That means in an expedition a Mansabdar of lower rank had to obey the Mansabdar of higher rank in matters of war. Secondly, the Mughal Mansabdars were known by the number of - Zat and Sawar. During the last ten years of Akbar’s reign, instead of singular number, Mansabdars rank came to be denoted by two numbers – Zat and Sawar. There was a controversy about the definition of Zat and Sawar. The explanation given by historians Arthar Ali and U. N. Day is generally held valid in academic circles. Accordingly, at first, Zat placed the Mansabdar in appropriate position, which indicated his rank. Sawar determined the number of horses and horsemen the Mansabdar had to furnish. Secondly Sawar rank was either equal or lower than that of the Zat. Hence the position of the Mansabdar was determined by the Zat number, not that of Sawar. For example, Mansabdar with 4000 Zat and 2000 Sawar (4000/2000 in short) was in higher in rank than a Mansabdar of 3000/3000. Some changes occurred in the reign of Jahangir. A new Sawar rank, Do Aspa Sih Aspa was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gunpowder Empires Dbq

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Great leadership early on in the Muslim empires helped maintain dominance.According to Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq,Suleiman the Magnificent,who was the Ottoman Sultan from 1520-1560 ,chose leaders and high ranked officials based on how their work ethics are."Those who receive the highest offices from the Sultan...do not believe that high qualities are either natural or hereditary... but are partly a gift of God,and are partly result of good training..."Which shows that the empires chose leaders and high ranked officials are chosen very strictly ,which led to great leaders in the dynasties.(Doc.3) Abdul ul-Qadir Bada' uni was a Muslim cleric who wrote about how the emperor Akbar the Great,Mughal ruler from 1556 CE to 1605 CE, who further educated himself from different perspectives,from Brahmans,Priest,Buddhist monks and many…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HoremhebDjeserkheperureSetepenre 1321-1295 · Consolidation of prior moves to re-establish traditional practises.· Dismantling of Aten temples at East Karnak; desecration of the Amarna Royal Tomb and Ay's tomb possibly carried out at this time· Reorganisation of the state· Foundations laid for 19th Dynasty…

    • 1057 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 26 Vocab

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Vizier: Ottoman equivalent of the Abbasid wazir; head of the Ottoman bureaucracy; after 15th century often more powerful than sultan.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AP World EMPIRE DBQ

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Document 1: SAFAVID “great liking for warfare and weapons of war…fine soldier and very skilled, and his men so dexterous—use of muskets””realm extended and soldiers receive pay all year” Paul Simon, missionary to Safavid Court of Shah Abbas The Great in the city of Isfaha, 1605—visitor to Safavid court, therefore perhaps biased in treatment of soldiers and mencourt has only the best of the best. Plus biased towards Europe, therefore men are “little behind our men in Europe.”  success of the empire was its treatment of the recruited slave youth into the army and bureaucracybackbone of army and loyal to Abbas I.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    different generals at the head of their armies. These generals ranged from very skilled, highly…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Mahmud II: slaughtered Janissaries, families and religious allies, reforms based on Western influence (angered conservative religious leaders)…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap World Ch 20

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aurangzeb – son and successor of Shah Jahan in Mughal India; determined to extend Muslim control over whole of subcontinent; wished to purify Islam of Hindu influences; incessant warfare exhausted empire despite military successes; died in 1707…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 2

    • 926 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Document two shows how the Mongol army was organized. In the Mongol army a captain looks over ten men and then out of the ten captains one is in charge of one hundred men and out of the one hundred captains one is a captain of one thousand and then two or three men are in charge of the whole army although one has more control of the others. This…

    • 926 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 12th century, the great ruler Temujin, soon to be known as Genghis Khan, arose. He fought to join clans, and become Khan, or ruler. New strategies and ideas were enforced after having Genghis Khan as ruler such as tribal cavalry, and mobile tactical teams in the military. Over the next three decades, he led a constant military…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World History Notes

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages

    4. In the view of the Ottomans, the sultan supplied justice and defense for the common people (the raya),…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire had originated from the Turkic nomadic groups. The governments of all three kingdoms were Muslim-based. However the Ottoman and Mughal empires were Sunni-based, while the Safavid Empire espoused Shi’ism, different forms of the Muslim religion. These kingdoms were all ruled by absolute monarchs, and also had revenues from taxation on the agrarian people. The peoples who lived in these kingdoms that were not Muslims did not have to follow the Muslim laws. All three kingdoms were also multi-linguistic and practiced inward orientation. Also, they were military based and had superior cavalries. The Mughal and Safavid empires, however, lacked a navy. The Ottoman and Safavid empires had a mixed society, as in the Mughal Empire, the society was mainly inhabited by populations of Hindus. These empires were known as the “Gunpowder Empires.” There were called this because of their use of muskets, cannons, and other types of guns in their military conquests.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottomans and the Mughals are two of the greatest and most powerful civilizations of the modern period. Their moments of glory in the sixteenth century represent high points in human creativity and art. They built empires, which were the largest and most influential of the Muslim empires of the modern period, and their culture and military influence extended into Europe. Most of the triumphant moments of the two empires came during the reigns of Suleyman I the Magnificent in Ottoman Empire and Akbar the great Mughal. Just as the reigns of these two leaders marked highpoints in the growth of their empires, their deaths marked starting points for the decline of their great empires.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1932 and 1933, Ukraine took part in one of the biggest genocides the world has ever seen. Although unlike the Holocaust, it never really got much exposure due to the Soviet Union’s tactics of hiding this disaster. The Soviet Union made sure no foreign journalists were able to enter the country, although they did allow a few communist journalists to view what was happening. These communist journalists wrote lies saying that they didn’t see any evidence of the Ukrainian people being starved (Perloff). This tragic event seamlessly went unnoticed to many people, but the Ukrainians would never forget what happened.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Spread of Islam

    • 1295 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kennedy, Hugh N. (2001). The armies of the caliphs: Military and society in the early Islamic state. London: Routledge.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Hobbes claims that without a government to enforce law and order, we would find ourselves in a “war...of every man against every man.” What reasons does he give for believing this? Do you think he is right?…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics