Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Satisfactory Essays
698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Was it right to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
By Ellie Hayes

I think that the U.S. did the right thing by bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The cold hard fact is that Japan started the war, we just ended it.
This debate will always be controversial because of the amount of Japanese citizens the two bombs killed and injured, but I believe those people are looking at it from the wrong perspective.
The Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor was one of the most devastating tragedies in American history. Soldiers asleep in their beds within their ships were gunned down in cold blood. There was no warning of the impending attack which was gutless and cowardly by a nation that we were not at war with. Innocent women and children died in the attack that day leaving broken American families and orphaned children. Over 2400 innocent Americans died that December morning. Over 1200 more were injured. Japan started the fight in a cowardly manner; we ended it to ensure no more Americans died at the hand of the Japanese military.
It is our duty to protect the American people. We used our resources to create the atomic bomb to use if ever we needed it. Japan bombed Pearl Harbor to sink our battleships because they felt the ships were the biggest threat to them. We used the same tactic. America did what we needed to do to protect American lives. We were just doing what we thought was best for the United States and American citizens.
In addition to saving American lives, the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, ended the war, saving the United States a lot of tax payer money. Money that the American people could have used toward their families, city growth and restoring the already damaged military resources. By ending the war early we saved money in the form of weapons, ships, planes, ammunition and gas. War is expensive and takes a lot of financing to keep going.
The war did a lot for our country’s future power ranking. Before the war, we were not seen as a serious threat to other countries. Developing the atomic bomb gave the United States more power in the world. People no longer wanted to go to war with us because of the weaponry we had. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a demonstration to the world as to the damage our weapons could inflict. It scared the other countries around the world into believing that we were a major power and they didn’t want to challenge us in war. In turn, that kept our country out of war for many years, saving countless American lives and dollars in resources.
After the bombings, other countries were expending their resources to copy the United States by trying to create their own atomic bomb. These countries were wasting millions of dollars and time trying to create something that we had already accomplished. In the meantime, we were advancing ourselves into space travel, new inventions and economic advancement instead of in the military, which was already very strong.
Our government’s actions and decisions in the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki reinsured American citizens that we were a strong country. A government that did not have a majority of its citizens believing they had them in their best interests quickly became more trusting and respectful of those making the decisions.
In conclusion, I believe America’s choice to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved many American lives, made us an instant world power and caused the U.S. great economic advancement. The bombing kept us out of countless wars, and saved us millions of dollars in expenditures. It is sad that so many innocent Japanese lives had to be taken to end the war, but Japan started the war by killing many of our innocent Americans. They could have prevented the confrontation from happening by choosing not to bomb Pearl Harbor. We were not the aggressor in this conflict, but instead reacted to defend our country and its people. It was the duty of our government to save American lives. I believe the decision to drop the bombs did just that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    They in my opinion should have restricted the bombing to the opposing soldiers and not killed civilians. The retaliation mentality that they had created the illusion that killing thousands upon thousands of people would equalize what had happened on Pearl Harbor and is a reasonable response. There were fatalities of both parties that should never have happened. The phrase “two wrongs don’t make a right” is true for this situation. Can we really rationalize the murders of all the people in world war two? Everyone’s lives that were lost from both sides didn't have to die.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that the bombing by the United States was justified because the bomb saved lives and the Japanese cheap shot the U.S. at Pearl Harbor. For starters, the bomb saved lives. The bomb dropped by the Americans on the Japanese, saved many more American and Japanese lives. The Japanese said that they would never quit, as it was the dishonorable thing to do. If the Americans were to have tried to capture Japan, the Japanese citizens were prepared to commit seppoku. If the Americans were to have tried by force, many Americans would be wounded in the attempt. Next, the Americans were not in the wrong for bombing the Japanese because the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor when the Americans were not in the war. This justified the Americans act because…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite its destructive consequences, the American bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to put an end to the war in the Pacific. President Truman’s choice to release a nuclear weapon on Japan was the fastest solution to ending the United States’ involvement in the Second World War, making the decision the most time efficient way out. Hiroshima’s destruction was also, very possibly, the only way for the United States to win the war, because the Japanese were very clear that they were prepared to fight until they were down to their last man. The Japanese military was the strongest in the world, so ending the war with a bang was much more appealing to Americans and the Truman Administration than fighting until there was no one left to fight. Perhaps most importantly, the dropping of the atomic bomb saved the lives of millions of American soldiers and civilians, as well as Japanese soldiers and civilians. This made it not only the quickest way to bring the soldiers home and ensure the United States’ victory, but also the best way to reduce the lives lost on both sides. The Truman Administration’s decision to drop a nuclear bomb on the Japanese was horrific, but necessary in bringing about a cost-effective, Japanese surrender that saved more lives than it took away.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason that the Americans were right to bomb japan is because of the Japanese fighting spirit, the Bushido. The Japanese had suffered heavy naval losses and hardly have any more men to continue fighting the war. Yet they wouldn’t give up the fight. According to sources, the Japanese were told by their minister of defense to protect and defend their empire with their life. This shows no sign of surrender.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic that was dropped on Japan helped end the war earlier. The atomic bomb was the best way to assure an end to the war. “When the atomic bomb became available in July 1945, it appeared to be the most promising way to end the war”(Walker). By dropping the bomb on Japan, they would have to surrender because of their loss and destruction. The atomic bombs made Japan’s emperor make a decision as whether to surrender or continue. “The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki persuaded Emperor Hirohito, who had wavered for weeks, that the war must end immediately” (Walker). By dropping the bomb, the U.S. ended the war…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trumans Decision

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pearl Harbor brought upon a war that America was hoping to avoid. Our right to have self-defense and moral duty to our country led Truman to his decision. Since 1942 America had been fighting World War II on two fronts. On May 8th, 1945 the war against Germany ended. At the time it became critical to end the war with Japan. That’s when the atomic bomb became an option for America. The morning of August 6th, 1945 the American B-29 dropped the atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The bomb was built as a weapon of war. Since America was at war, congress was allowed to spend two billion dollars on the project. If the United States did not use the weapon, it in itself, along with the money would have been wasted. The Manhattan project, the project to develop the first nuclear weapon, was a success. Once President Truman had learned about the successfulness of the bomb he would have the capacity to end the war with Japan in his hands.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason the dropping of the atomic bomb was the right thing to do because it saved many more lives. It was estimated that millions of american soldiers lives’ were saved. If the bomb was not dropped then the United States would have lost millions of the young…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, the Japanese did bomb the U.S first but didn’t more than half of the America people tell them they weren’t right for doing it on pearl harbor ? So if their wrong, what makes it okay for the United States? The United states was mad because Japan came to their land and killed their innocent people and destroyed everything that they worked so hard to form, but now it’s suddenly not okay for Japan to be just as upset? It’s not even about who wanted the war to end and who was going to do what! Was killing thousands of innocent women, and children, really worth the satisfaction of being able to say you “won” ? okay sure Japan did awful things, but America lowered themselves to a incredibly low level with this evil action. And were in no way right for their actions at all.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States’ decision to bomb two cities of Japan, which we’re Nagasaki and Hiroshima, was not at all justified. Many people know that Japan deliberately attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, in order to strategically weaken the American Naval Base. However, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was to push Japan to surrender the war . The bombing was unjustified because the U.S. military: targeted heavily populated civilian cities, deliberately planned their attack to kill, did not give Japan enough time to respond to the first bombing, (4) did not experience as many casualties than Japan.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    These bombings ultimately saved innocent lives even though there were multiple tragedies. Although, the exact death rate from the attacks shall never be truly known, it is certain that at least 200,000 innocent people lives were taken during this time. The reason it saved lives was because the United States first plan was to launch a full invasion of Japans home islands and this would have killed far more people…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They said that the bomb was necessary to end the war, but they didn’t even attempt to go for a more diplomatic approach. They ended up killing innocent peoples' lives just because they can. Apparently it was necessary for the ending of the war, killing over 100,000 innocent people. If the US was to be bombed because Japan wanted to “end war”, then there would've been an outrage and Japan would have had a target on their backs. Just like the people that were responsible for orchestrating 9/11 we’re not justified for actions of killing innocent people, because that’s insane and cruel.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The impact of the atomic bomb on Japan is a reason why the bomb was significant because they were the trial run. The atomic bomb was powerful and caused suffering to thousands of people. The first bomb (which was dropped in Hiroshima) caused 40,000 people to die instantly. When the second bomb dropped (in Nagasaki) 80,000 people died instantly. In addition to this, another 187,747 died in casualties including radiation. Japan was used as the ‘guinea pig’ for the atomic bombs, but thousands of civilians were killed or affected by it. However, the two cities that were bombed, were civilian based, not army based cities. These two cities wouldn’t have gained anything from the war as they were not army based. If America had bombed an army base that would have been justified, as revenge for Pearl Harbour. If they had given Japan a warning that they were going to be bombed they could have negotiated about it, but because they were never given a chance to surrender or strike a deal, it became unfair to the Japanese civilians.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, even though the United States and Japan were at war and were protected their own citizens they could've tried to prevent the war a little further. President Truman should have warned the Japanese and let them know what the United States was capable of. However, he ordered the people to drop the bomb with no warning. However, if the Japanese did not agree to surrender after the warning then the bombs could have been dropped and had been “justified.” I also feel that the United States went in thinking about it the wrong way. “Interested in producing the “greatest psychological effect,” the Committee members agreed that the “most desirable target would be a vital war plant employing a large number of workers and closely surrounded by workers’ houses.” (Interim Committee Meeting, 1945) The people should not have wanted to kill innocent people only and maybe they…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was The Bomb Necessary

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion YES! Dropping the bomb was very necessary, it was also reasonable considering the fact that US lost a total of more than 418,000 both military and innocent civilians. I also think Japan deserved to be bombed because they committed the same act at Pearl Harbor. Of course we have some remorse because it killed an large amount of people. We also gave them multiple warning, we told them if they do not surrender…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Atomic Bomb Morality

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The development of the atomic bomb and chemical warfare forever changed the way people saw the world. It was a landmark in time for which there was no turning back. The constant balancing of the nuclear super powers kept the whole of humankind on the brink of atomic Armageddon. Fear of nuclear winter and the uncertainty of radiation created its own form of a cultural epidemic in the United States. During these tense times in human history officials made controversial decisions such as the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Dangerous biological experiments and bombs tests were carried out in the name of the greater good and national defense. Some historians and scientists argue that the decisions and acts carried out by the U.S. during World War II and the Cold War were unethical because of the direct damage they did. The United States' decisions were moral because it can be proven their actions were aimed at achieving a greater good and those that were put in potential danger volunteered and were informed of the risk.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays