Some say that standardized testing is fair and a reliable measure of student achievement. ("Is the use of standardized tests improving education in America?") Without the standardized testing, policy makers would have to rely on the school and teachers to individually grade them, and teachers may have “favorable” results. Multiple choice tests are graded by machine and not subjective to human bias. Supporters of the testing say that standardized tests are inclusive because the content and testing conditions are equivalent for everyone. They also say that standardized test are not narrowing the curriculum, rather they are focusing it on important basic skills that all students need to learn. Teaching to the test can be a good thing, it simply means focusing on essential content and skills, eliminating time wasting activities that don’t produce any learning gains, and motivating…
Both articles identify and analyze two different effects of high stakes testing. The first article doesn’t directly attack high stakes testing but simply analyzes data and forms a conclusion. This would mean that it can be furthered explained to draw a conclusion about high stakes testing. The second article begins to show a negative side to the consequences of high stakes testing; therefore, it is more certain in its purpose. High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitive Metasynthesis focuses on deciding whether high stakes testing has been able to take control of school curriculums and therefore identifies what changes it has made. Wayne Au analyzes his data collection to draw the conclusion that there are “three different, interrelated…
There are a variety of ways that tests can be misused and have an effect on the individual being tested. One ethical issue that may arise is how the test scores are interpreted and used. Especially the interpretation of test scored when testing diverse populations (Anastasi, & Urbina, 1997). According to Anastasi and Urbina (1997), scores can often be misinterpreted when testing diverse populations because of the lack of investigating further into why individuals from diverse populations obtained the low scores. They go onto report that researchers must explore other factors that may have impacted the test scores that the test itself cannot reveal.…
If we make learning meaningful and align it with the standards, then the tests would not be the horrific nightmare they are for some children. Children have breakdowns about not doing well on the high-stakes tests. Students should not feel this way in school. The classroom should be a comfortable place where learning grows, not a drill practice on facts for a federal…
The current period of learning is being determined by standardized testing, and has become the main focus of many arguments within the education system. Students all over the United States are being subjected to standardized tests often throughout their years in school due to legislation that has been set by Government over the past several years. While there are many upsides to the reasons for these assessments, there are also negative effects of this. Students are expected to make a certain score on tests to get to where they want to go. It is an unfair advantage for people who can pay their way through their education. From Star testing in grade school to the ACT and SAT in high school, students are “taught to the test” (Meador 1). Although it does give students and teachers initiative to work for something, Standardized tests are an unfair measure of students’ thinking level and academic performance; therefore, this must be changed. Standardized Testing must be changed because they are unreasonable, inefficient, and it puts a lot of extreme pressure on both the students and the teachers.…
Standardized testing, every student should be familiar with it, but is it nonsense? Does it actually help schools and their students advance in academic competence, or does it hinder their ability by adding more anxiety and stress to students? Jacequeline Howard, a twenty year old student helps us disclose on these examinations by giving us a student’s perspective on how standardized testing is not only changing the way government looks at funding, but also discouraging students and changing the way people look at students. Through Howards ethos, pathos, logos, and style in her essay, we can really see her passion for other students and her reason to promote a change.…
Imagine something that makes hundreds- no, thousands- of people miserable each year. Something that wastes billions of dollars. Something that decides the future of a child in one day. Sadly, such a thing exists. It is called standardized testing. Not only is it ineffective, it also hurts many different people in many different ways. First of all, it hurts students and parents. It also hurts teachers and even the government. The researchers and data analytists at the SEEALL University have looked at all the files and all the facts, and they have concluded that testing is a hot-and important- topic. Their findings can change people’s lives. This is important. But, in the end, this analyst thinks that when you look at all of the facts, it is…
Members of this burgeoning anti-test movement fail to grasp testing’s valuable role in motivating and guiding students and teachers. Preparing young Americans for success in the global economy will require our schools to improve, not abolish, academic standards.…
Standardized tests are not a good representation of a student’s overall ability. Some students are intellectually gifted while other students may be artistically inclined. There are still other students who may do poorly math and science but excel in computer graphics or auto mechanics. Those who oppose my argument feel that tests show what a student knows. This is not all false, but students who show their…
Within every student is an unfathomable amount of details that make him or her think and act the way they do. Their intellectual level cannot, and should not, be based entirely on one high-stakes test at the term’s end. In agreement with this is professor of education and public policy, George Madaus. According to him, these tests “leave out one of the most informational things we have about these kids, and that’s teacher judgements.” This statement is a perfect example of the faults high-stakes testing has. Measures of achievement hold more substance than a simple arithmetic test can provide. Personality traits, moral development, the infinite complexities we have, these can only be judged by human interaction.…
Standardized testing in our education system is oftentimes frowned upon. Though some disagree with standardized testing, others see it as an advantage to education in the future. I recently reviewed two articles with opposing opinions on this controversial topic. I noticed that one article worried more about how they felt emotionally, and less focused on the academic advantages or disadvantages. This is an issue in America, I believe when it comes to education we should worry about educational outcomes and not emotional distress due to the criteria in which you are required to abide by.…
We feel that high stakes testing is no longer being used for assessment purposes. These tests are now being used for the sole determination of graduation. Our classrooms are turning into testing prep centers. This testing has become a substitute for the curriculum instead of simply a measure of it.…
school student has taken, are not fair to students who may come from a poor…
Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defines education as “the bringing up, as a child; to instruction; formation of manners. Education comprehends all that series of instruction and discipline which is intended to enlighten the understanding, correct the temper, and form the manners and habits of youth, and fit them for usefulness in their future stations.” Since the 18th century education and the philosophy of education have taken a radical journey from high esteem and voluntary participation to a compulsory predetermined education. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and other educational reforms promoting high-stakes testing, accountability and global markets continue to drive education policy. Parents, educators and lawmakers need to question whether the new approach to education should replace the previous successful model of education. Over the past two centuries the educational evolution that has taken place and the resulting current policies of NCLB actually undermines successful academic growth and America’s capacity to maintain an educated civic-minded society.…
With enacting of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), states are now mandated in testing students enrolled in public schools. Data from testing must be published and schools are to be held accountable for continued failing marks (Goertz & Duffy, 2003). NCLB is a continuation of a trend widely accepted and advanced by a majority of states within the last few decades. In 1994 Congress enacted the Improving America’s Schools Act, later improved by the NCLB, initially mandating the testing of students. The movement of accountability and testing has continued to expand into other curriculums, grades, and subjects. It appears that testing, at least in the moderate future, is here to stay.…