Preview

Here it comes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
19484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Here it comes
The Conrad-Demarest Model of Empire: Basic Principles for the Roman, Han Chinese, and Gupta Empires

Necessary preconditions for the rise of empires:
State-level government:
Rome: republic then empire with emperor
Han: kept most of Qin centralized government in place
Gupta: decentralized; regionalism
High agricultural potential in the area:
Rome: wheat, grapes, cattle
Han: wheat, millet, pigs
Gupta: cotton, wool, calico (chief revenue – tax on agriculture)
An environmental mosaic
Rome: Alps, Mediterranean Sea, forests, Tiber and other rivers, hills
Han: Tianshan mountains, Yellow and Yangtze Rivers, loess soil, Pacific Ocean.
Gupta: Indus and Ganges Rivers, Thar Desert, Deccan Plateau, Himalayas
Several small states with no clearly dominant state (power vacuum)
Rome and other city-states on Italian peninsula; surrounding states in Mediterranean (Greek states, Egypt, Judea, Syria, Cyprus, Gaul, Romania, Spain, Sicily, Sardinia, Carthage, etc.)
Han: Qin broke into smaller states
Gupta: regional leadership/rule.
Mutual antagonisms among those states:
Rome: rivalry between pastoralists in hills and agriculturalists in plains
Han: Warring States period before Qin unification
Gupta: Hinduism vs. Buddhism; women losing rights.
Adequate military resources:
Rome: soldiers first recruited only from peasant class on Italian peninsula; population inexhaustible.
Han: Soldiers recruited from peasant class within the entire empire; population inexhaustible.
Gupta: ability to make metal weapons; social system extremely strict, therefore military was particular in choosing (relatively peaceful time). Powerful army maintained tight control.
The primary reason a state succeeded in empire building was:
An ideology supporting personal identification with the state, empire, conquest and militarism:
Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury;

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gupta India (320 B.C.E-550 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) both had very distinctive methods of political control based on everything from cultural reasons to geographic limitations. Many factors were present affecting the similarities and differences between the two.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The beginning for the direction of government and administration started with Julius Caesar wanting a centralized, imperial form of government. His plans did not span out with upset elite classes that led to his assassination. The elite men wanted to create a government that was not in their power, which led to conflict and chaos. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, ended the struggle and was the leader to start the imperial rule that was right for Rome. The government was disguised as a republic. Just as Caesar, Augustus ruled by centralizing political and military power. He preserved traditional republican offices and forms of government. Members of the Roman elite were also members of the government. Augustus accumulated vast power and took full responsibility for the important governmental functions. As a form of a bureaucracy, he was very careful to place individuals loyal to him…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many Western civilizations have influenced the way we live our lives today, many forget the progressive movements of early Classical and Contemporary Oriental cultures. Two of these cultures that are still revisited by historians today were the epitome of early Asian civilization and very influential guides for cultures to come. Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 A.D.) and Gupta India (320 C.E.-525 C.E.) were two dynasty-based civilizations in the early conception of Southeastern Asian rule. Though both had a very similar class based society and both had to endure outside invasions as well as internal conflicts, they both had unique, and future utilized, ways of maintaining their rule.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will compare similarities and the differences of the Roman and Han Dynasty empires. It will compare their creation, maintenance, culture, and decline.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The later years of the Tang Empire saw increasing turmoil as a result of conflict with Tibetans and Turkic Uighurs.…

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The largest empires’ the world had yet to seen, Han China and Imperial Rome succeeded in centralizing control to a greater degree than other empires; their impact on the lands and people due to trade was dominating, and their belief systems dictated their way of life. Strong belief systems’ led Han China and the Roman Empire to maintain a resilient bureaucracy as well as strict views for women roles and standards, economically their success was based off of their surplus of land and goods.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the time period 600 B.C.E to 600 C.E the world had many large empires controlling lots land, and two controlled their empires similarly.One of these is the Roman Empire who originally was a republic that had a large bureaucracy that made the decisions, but later on Caesar Augustus took over complete control and claimed divine power. When Caesar Augustus took over the bureaucracy lost all its power and the emperor gained that power. The other empire is the Gupta of India which was a not very centralized government but had a emperor that claimed divine power. The Gupta also did not have a very large bureaucracy like the Romans. The Roman Empire and the Gupta Empire both had a emperor at the center with a small bureaucracy, but the Gupta gave some power to their local officials.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The different between Rome and Han is that Rome had a strong sense of communal identity that was lacking in Han states. The Qin-Han imperial system tolerated no local deviation nor any form of communal power; the Roman empire appeared more like a federation cities and provinces than like a fully integrated domain.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I. The Han (of China) and the Gupta (of India) were both empires that used various techniques of imperial administration to make their empires succeed. Although the Han Empire and Gupta Empire share their receiving of rewards for temporarily succeeding, antagonisms among their states, and their failure, they differ in their state-level government, types of adequate military resources, and their specific revolutions that toppled their empires.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Rome." Encyclopædia Britannica from Encyclopaedia Britannica Ready Reference 2004 CD-ROM. Copyright © 1994-2003 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. October 1, 2012.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics in Mongol

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the time period from 1000-1500 C.E, the political systems of Mongols, who dominated the steps of Central Asia but also settled societies in Persia, Anatolia, and India, differed from that of China, in eastern Asia, both making a great impact of societies to follow and modern times. In order to gain deep insight on these two societies and observe who made a larger impact, these different societies must be compared. The eunuchs and mandarins of China greatly enhanced the authority of the central government where the Mongols, with the stoppage of kinships forming, were productive, but disorganized on other fronts. The decentralized government of the Mongols was no comparison to the extremely influential centralized rule of China. The land warriors of the Mongols that foraged the lands were not as productive as the great naval power of China who made extreme advancements over water. Because China was more centralized and controlled, it had had a greater influence on political systems of today compared to the Mongols.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Rome is one of the most beautiful places in the world, but rarely talked about. Did you know Ancient Rome is located in Italy however the city's boundary changed so many times during all the ancient rulings. Generally Rome ruled all the lands around the Mediterranean Sea. This also included many other surrounding places.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Corinth: Corcyra and parts of Illyrian Coast; Syracuse in Sicily; Potidaea in the North Aegean, also Ambracia.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Classical period, Han China and Mauryan/Gupta India developed many methods of political control. Although these empires were located in different geographic regions, they both used social hierarchy, language, bureaucracy, and religion as a means of political control. Many of Classical India’s religious beliefs and bureaucratic practices contrasted each other in relation to the ways that they supported the methods of political control.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays