Health Promotion Pamphlet: Accident Prevention And Caregivers Of Infants
| Module 1 Rubric: Environmental Factors and Health Promotion Pamphlet: Accident Prevention and Safety Promotion for Parents and Caregivers of Infants v4.4 | Points Possible 6 |
Criteria | Achievement Level | | Unsatisfactory
0%-71% | Less Than Satisfactory
72%-75% | Satisfactory
76%-83% | Good
84%-94% | Excellent
95% - 100% | Explanation of Potential Effect | 0.64 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety of infants is not given.
| 0.68 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety is minimally explained and/or inaccurate. | 0.75 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor …show more content…
| 0.23 points
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | 0.25 points
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | 0.28 points
The presentation is good. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | 0.3 points
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. | Originality | 0.21 points
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness. | 0.23 points
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought. | 0.25 points
The product shows evidence of originality. While based on other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work does offer some new insights. | 0.28 …show more content…
While based on an extensive collection of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights. | 0.3 points
The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research. | Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 0.21 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. | 0.23 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | 0.25 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. | 0.28 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. | 0.3 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
| Paper
Criteria | Achievement Level | | Unsatisfactory
0%-71% | Less Than Satisfactory
72%-75% | Satisfactory
76%-83% | Good
84%-94% | Excellent
95% - 100% | Explanation of Potential Effect | 0.64 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety of infants is not given.
| 0.68 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety is minimally explained and/or inaccurate. | 0.75 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor …show more content…
| 0.23 points
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | 0.25 points
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | 0.28 points
The presentation is good. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | 0.3 points
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. | Originality | 0.21 points
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness. | 0.23 points
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought. | 0.25 points
The product shows evidence of originality. While based on other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work does offer some new insights. | 0.28 …show more content…
While based on an extensive collection of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights. | 0.3 points
The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research. | Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 0.21 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. | 0.23 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | 0.25 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. | 0.28 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. | 0.3 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
| Paper