Preview

Has the Role of the Prime Minister Become More Presidential?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Has the Role of the Prime Minister Become More Presidential?
Tran Luu Truc Anh (Ann) AS Politics – Homework
Has the role of the Prime Minister become more presidential?
There is an argument that the Prime Minister dominates in the British Political system. The British traditional system has moved away from the “cabinet government” model to a “prime ministerial government” model. But there is a different question concerning about the role and importance of the Prime Minister. Does the role of the PM become more presidential?
Firstly, Prime Minister is the leader of his party in the House of Commons and the head of the government. However, in fact, the Prime Minister has come to be, not legally the Head of State, the leader of the nation, irrespective of party allegiance. It means that in time of difficulty, emergency or crisis such as war or terrorist threats, the country can unite behind its head of government. Although the Head of State is held by the monarch, but it is just ceremonial. The true power lies on the Prime Minister. It can be argued that there has been a long term seeing the prime minister of the day rather than the monarch as national leader. Moreover, the undoubted growth in the important of foreign and military affairs has contributed to a presidential ‘feel’ for the office of the Prime Minister. When the Head of Government has to negotiate with foreign powers, attend international conferences, negotiate treaties, conduct wars and meet visiting dignitaries, he is bound to appear presidential. In large conference he will be seen rubbing shoulders with the president of France or USA who represent their countries on these occasions. For example: Margaret Thatcher with Ronald Reagan, Tony Blair with Bill Clinton and George Bush. All forged close links with the US president.
Media plays a very important role in the change of role of the Prime Minister. It is the proliferation of news and current affairs of programme, the arrival of 24-hours news, and the use of technology which allowed instant

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of Prime Minister has been constantly evolving over the years, and it can be argued that the degree of power he/she wields changes with it. For example, during the late 17th century, a Chief Minister existed as a special advisor to the monarch. However by the late 19th century, the Prime Minister is the leader of the largest party of House of Commons and enjoys greater political power, whereas the monarch acts as Head of State.…

    • 664 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One example of the growing tendency of the UK Prime Minister’s to be more ‘Presidential’ is how the growth of spatial leadership has become more prevalent in recent years. Prime Ministers now tend to distance themselves from Cabinet and be their own ruler of government. They also tend to get entire ideologies named after them such as Thatcherism or Blairism (after Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair). Prime Ministers also tend to be more ‘with the people’ than with their party. In conjunction with this, personalised election campaigns are becoming more common during General Elections. More and more focus is heaped upon the party leaders (for example, David Cameron versus Gordon Brown rather than the Conservatives versus Labour) and they become a sort of brand image. Closely related to this is the fact that Prime Ministers are now claiming personal mandates on their own personal election success rather than a party mandate.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * “ difficult to look at Cameron and Obama after bilateral and say they did not look similarly presidential” – McNaughton…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea that the prime minister is now more presidential is drawn from the knowledge of the United States president and how the British Prime Minister is compared to him. Firstly, the media turns the Prime Minister into a political celebrity. The action the Prime Minister takes is published in newspapers and television. The Prime minister is the spokesperson for the government. This is presidential in the sense that the PM is in the hot seat among his peers, which the president would be but only because he doesn't really have any peers.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historically, the Prime Minister is head of government, chief policy maker, and party leader. The power of the Prime Minister included the appointment and the reshuffle of the Cabinet, power of dissolution, and other prerogative powers like Honor recommendations. The…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P. M Democratic Dictator

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1867 Canada’s government was established as a parliamentary democracy. It was declared that those in government are to follow the Bill of Rights and run Canada for the people. Recently, there has been much debate on whether or not the Prime Minister could be considered a “Democratic Dictator”. Democracy “is a foremost issue” and the people of Canada are arguing that one person may hold too much power. After exploring the possibilities, I do not believe the Prime Minister can be considered a Democratic Dictator, as he/she must be elected, have an opposition, and every law proposed is voted on in the House of Commons. However, in opposition to this statement, the P.M. holds…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Prime ministers are almost omnipotent in the political system in the UK, this is due to the shear variety of powers in-which the prime minister holds, and the prerogatives that are taken advantage by the prime minister. However, checks on powers in the UK means that the prime minister is not as power as they appear, moreover, they are not separable from the UK political system, henceforth, they are controlled and limited within the system they are part of, thus, more often than not, prime ministers are less powerful then sometimes claimed.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people would like to believe that the president is the most powerful person in the world. However, the structure of America has put restraints on the president that a Prime Minister would not have. There are many differences between the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Canada. These differences include regulations, term of office, powers, and cultures. Throughout this paper you will learn that just being the leader of their country is about as similar as these two people get.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Prime Minister

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Canadian Prime Minister is the head of the Government and has significant powers in deciding how the nation is supposed to work in their stipulated time frame. While he/she is not the head of the state, he/she leads the Canadian Armed Forces and appoints the cabinet ministers, Supreme Court judges, senators, ambassadors, and heads of crown corporations. However, the Canadian constitution does not explicitly state most of the powers currently exercised by the Prime Minister because it does not establish the post of Prime Minister. These powers arise from unwritten Constitutional…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is evidence to suggest that cabinet no longer makes key decisions, and that the power rests with the Prime Minister alone. Traditionally the Prime Minister would be first among equals, chairing debates but only ultimately has the same say on issues as any other cabinet minister, when it came down to voting on the issue. Badgehot says that Cabinet has become just a ‘Dignified Institution’ in the 20th century, and many other political commentators have echoed this theory, saying the power now rests firmly in the hands of the Prime Minister.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prime Ministers of the last 25 years have been notes for deviating of what would be considered ‘Prime Ministerial’ into more of a ‘Presidential’ role. This is due to the expansion of a key power that the Prime Minister has, that of the Chief Executive, being expanded.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why prime ministers seem to be more powerful in relation to their cabinet colleagues is because of how much authority they have over the cabinet. The prime minister leads the other ministers within a cabinet (Key Point p. 102), and in some places, such as the UK, are seem to be one of Europe’s most powerful. They have control over their colleagues, such as controlling what the cabinet does and does not discuss and having the power to hire and fire cabinet colleagues. Also, most ministers across Europe even prefer having a strong Prime Minister, “… as long as he or she is also willing to listen and involve his or her cabinet,” (p. 103). Also, prime ministers hold popularity in the public, sometimes driving their counterparts to be…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Canada is a fusion of the British parliamentary system with the American federalism. The Prime Minister is the highest role in the government. He can appoint or remove individual from the cabinet and patriotic appointments. Lloyd Axworthy was hired as a cabinet minister by both Trudeau and Chrétien (Cook & Belanger, 2007: p. 401). The PM controls all justices of the Supreme Court of Justice, vacant seats in the senate, all heads of Canadian Crown Corporations and many more.…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The famous work on the British Constitution by Walter Bagehot embodied a classic conception of the office which has informed many traditional textbook versions of British politics. This involved the idea of the PM as essentially a chairman of the nation’s most important committee, engaged in a constant search for consensus. The term ‘primus inter pares’- first amongst equals - used to describe a reality but could not now be said to do so.…

    • 3362 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays