Preview

How Coalition Government Has Affected The Role And Functions Of The Prime Minister And Cabinet

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
916 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Coalition Government Has Affected The Role And Functions Of The Prime Minister And Cabinet
How the coalition government has affected the role and functions of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
This essay aims to explain the effects of the established coalition government on the roles and functions of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. In order to present the topic properly, the roles and functions of the Prime Minister and Cabinet before the establishment of coalition government are introduced first. Subsequently, the changes in their roles and functions are presented in context of several examples, in comparison to the previous situations before the coalition government.

Historically, the Prime Minister is head of government, chief policy maker, and party leader. The power of the Prime Minister included the appointment and the reshuffle of the Cabinet, power of dissolution, and other prerogative powers like Honor recommendations. The
…show more content…
One major change that occurs in the Prime Minister’s function is that Cabinet appointments are now the result of negotiation between the parties, compared with the previous arbitrary appointment made by the Prime Minister. Previously, the Prime Minister appointed Cabinet members and allocated portfolios to its own party members only, thus making the Cabinet completely dominated by one party. Currently, in comparison, the appointments are to be agreed between the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister (HM government, 2010a). Similarly, any changes in the allocation of portfolios between the Parliamentary Parties during the Coalition period are also to be agreed between the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister. For instance, the current coalition stipulates that the Liberal Democrats shall occupy five Cabinet vacancies; and that Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister is at liberty to decide which of the Liberal Democrats’ MPs shall be allocated these five spots

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1931 the situation worsened and there was fear that the budget was unbalanced, which was allowed by the independent May Report which triggered a confidence crisis. The Labour Government agreed to make changes in taxation and expenditure in order to balance the budget and restore confidence, but the Cabinet could not agree on the two options available which was either introduce tariffs, or make 20% cuts in unemployment benefit. A final vote was taken on the issue and the Cabinet was split 11:9 with a minority including many political heavyweights such as George Lansbury threatening to resign rather than agree. Due to this unworkable split, on 24 August 1931 the government resigned. Both the Conservative and Liberal parties met with King George V and MacDonald, first to discuss support for the measures taken but again to discuss the shape of the next government. On 24 August MacDonald agreed to form a National Government composed of "men from all parties" with the specific aim of balancing the Budget and restoring confidence. The Government was then meant to resolve once these aims had been met and a general election was to be held.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument for is that the cabinet includes more than one political party, this means that the Prime Minister has to confer, with other MP’s and with the other party in the coalition, on all matters. This limits the patronage and decision-making power of the Prime Minister, and that he/ she has to share their power with another party, in order to come to a decision that both parties are happy with. An example of this was when the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats had to discuss the annual Spending Review and decide which taxes they should raise and cut. This led to both parties wanting to cut different taxes, which the other party wanted to raise, such as housing. If only one party was in government and the one Prime Minister had all the power, then they would have been able to cut and raise the taxes they wanted to, but being in a coalition meant that they had to come to a group agreement, where both parties weren’t entirely happy. This argument is quite strong because if the Prime Minister has to share his/ her powers it means it is harder for the cabinet to come to a decision, however it does lead to the decision being fairer and appealing to a wider range of the population.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AQA GOVP1 past papers

    • 1601 Words
    • 10 Pages

    25: Evaluate the main roles and functions performed by political parties within the UK political system.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another essential factor which would influence the degree of Prime Ministerial power is the unity of the ruling party or coalition. In Blair’s situation, he enjoyed an exceptionally united group, therefore being able to enjoy several years of complete domination. When Blair resigned, Brown was said to enjoy similar power, at least when he still enjoyed popularity. Cameron on the other hand would expect less of this as he had entered a coalition from the very beginning, which suggests that the cabinet is naturally divided. With different ideologies, it is inevitable that there will be times of disagreements, which suggests that he would…

    • 664 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    M1 – Explain in detail the responsibilities of the different levels of government in the UK…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Uk Coalition Gov

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitutional reform has been a significant issue for the Lib Dems. The Lib Dems and the Conservatives agreed on a figure of 600 MPs in Parliament. Both parties made compromises on their policies, but in reality the number of MPs was closer to what the Tories’ had wanted, to help him win a majority in the Commons than what the Lib Dems hoped for. The Tories had failed to deliver on a commitment made in the coalition agreement. The Lib Dems did hold a referendum on AV, as agreed in the coalition, but the results were not in their favour. Britain rejected AV in the nationwide voting system. The Lib Dems did however succeed in establishing a fixed term for Parliament. There is now a 5 year fixed term Parliament. Lib Dems are also calling for equality in gay marriage. The Conservatives however, suited to…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prime Minister is the most important person in British politics. The Prime Minister appoints his cabinet and makes the final decisions on major issues. The Prime Minister cannot become a President as the UK system would not allow it but in the recent years, people have criticised that our Prime Ministers have increasingly become more of a presidential figure in Parliament. Some of the ministers that have been referred to as presidential include Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair etc. Now in this essay, I will be analysing the factors that shows the growth of power of PM.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The executive is made up of the Prime Minister (PM) acting in place on the monarch and a group of ministers known as the PMs Cabinet. All cabinet members (including the PM) are members’ of the Privy Council and must also be members of the Commons or the Lord’s, by convention most being from the Commons. Therefore the executive is borne out of the legislature and directly accountable to it. The executive has many functions, such as the power of patronage which is vested in the PM, the setting of the agenda for government and the prioritising of legislation. The close union between the executive and the legislature is prima facie, a potential for abuse as liberal democratic theory calls for a separation between powers.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Prime Minister

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    He/She chairs cabinet meetings and has the powers to call consensus in such meetings. The lack of security of tenure among cabinet ministers means that any cabinet minister deemed hostile to the Prime Minister can be fired (Savoie, 2009). Therefore the cabinet ministers have no incentive to revolt or stand their ground against the Prime Minister especially when it is only a small number of cabinet ministers holding an opinion contrary to that of the Prime Minister. Therefore, Savoie, (2000) argues that ministerial powers do not flow from the ministers but from the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister also appoints many office bearers who are responsible for providing checks and balances to his government. This includes officers such as the Auditor General, and governor of the Bank of Canada.…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Supporting Learners

    • 3099 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Bibliography: 2. Cameron, D. and Clegg, N. (2010) The Coalition: Our Programme f0r Government. London: Cabinet Office.…

    • 3099 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    It gives rise to single-party governments. The ‘seat bonuses’ for the largest party common under FPTP (e.g. where one party wins 45 per cent of the national vote but 55 per cent of the seats) mean that coalition governments are the exception rather than the rule. This state of affairs is praised for providing cabinets which are not shackled by the restraints of having to bargain with a minority coalition partner.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This puts pressure on prime ministers to use the cabinet-forming process to build coalitions of parties and even coalitions within a party. Prime ministers must be sensitive to the demands of their backbench colleagues and to the leadership of governing parties.” To even think as to how we have been effected by this, to say the least even when non-parliamentarians are appointed, the majority you could say have a long standing position or connect within the party. The fact that it is a lot much easier to be elected into parliament in other major European countries in which the electoral system allows the party to situate members in places where it is straightforwardly able to achieve…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ministerial Advisership

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Ministerial advisers have become an integral component in the relationship between Australian ministers and Senior Public Servants (Maley, 2011). Initially introducted by the Whitlam government in 1972 due to perceived imbalances in ministerial power (Eichbaum & Shaw, 2010, 96), the function and presence of ministerial advisers has significantly expanding, and is now widely recognized as an important feature of the executive process (OECD, 2011). The adviser’s role is highly varied, dependent on factors such as political or social context, the leadership style of their ministers, and the attitude of the departments they are affiliated with (Maley, 2011, 1470). In its simplest form, the adviser role may be defined as an independent, partisan source of advice for ministers on departmental outputs regarding political affairs (Eichbaum & Shaw, 2007, 454). Advisers also serve an important function to the Australian Public Service (APS)…

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    QUESTION BANK ICSE

    • 2163 Words
    • 7 Pages

    9.State one point of difference between the Cabinet and the Council of Ministers with reference to their…

    • 2163 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays