Preview

Harry Reid Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
596 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Harry Reid Case
US Sen. Harry Reid is under Investigation, Says Utah Prosecutor

U. S. Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada is being investigated regarding a pay-to-play plan that involve two past attorneys general of Utah, said a country prosecutor Wednesday.
A Republican, Country Attorney Troy Rawlings ensured that he is inquiring on the accusation against the Democratic senator.
Rawlings, however, didn’t disclose anything about the allegations and only informed the petitions are filed on the information provided by the witnesses in the general case.
Reid, in a statement by his spokesperson Kristen Orthman fired back at Rawlings though he hasn’t been charged. The spokeswoman claimed Rawlings is grabbing attention using the name of Sen. Reid and thus, is accelerating
…show more content…
Both of them were arrested in the last summer as prosecutors stated the men involved with a wide-ranging, pay-to-play plan where they played favors with businessmen in difficulty with regulators at the time of their combined operating the state office for 13 years.
Swallow has begged not in the wrong to bribery charges. Shurtleff has urged not guilty to hindering justice charges. Both have schedules of trails in 2016.
Rawlings revived his criticism of the U.S. Department of Justice for restricting the information he has right to use and the matter what he is able to investigate.
Justice officials shut the investigation in 2013 without taking charges. FBI investigators continued the case to assist state attorneys who dealt it.
"It is not the matter of DOJ to inform me who should and who shouldn’t be investigated and which facts are relevant and matter to a state case," Rawlings said.
Justice officials avoided commenting on the matter.
Rawlings is considered the top prosecutor in Davis County in northern Utah since 2007. He succeeded his first election to this post after having worked as an attorney for six years. He started his profession as a defense

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virginia Entrapment Cas1

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The attorney later questioned the motives of one undercover informant. There where testimony in the record that this confidential informant was paid based on the results he got. So, in other words, he had a direct incentive to go into a place and try to see how much illegal activity he could get people to engage in. Kevin E. Martingayle, a Virginia Beach attorney representing Velvet and its owner, Samuel J.T.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, SALT LAKE DEPARTMENT…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fantasia Case Study

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During an argument between the Crown’s and defence’s attorney, the Crown’s attorney even stated that O’Brien might lie under oath, that was not respectful. There was no evidence that O’Brien would lie under oath or anything which lowered his credibility…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It all started during the vetting process of supreme court justices Clarence Thomas. During the Vetting process of supreme court justices, the FBI run background checks and contact people the nominee have worked with in the past to get an idea in their character. Hill was contacted during this time because she had worked with Thomas at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The senate called asking about Hill…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja224 Week 2

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    District Attorney Michael Nifong acknowledged and offered a full and unqualified apology for his crusade to convict three innocent white Duke University students who belonged to the lacrosse team of raping a black woman in March 2006. Nifong acknowledged there had been “no credible evidence” of their guilt. In fact there had been exculpatory evidence that he had quashed. His apology was rendered to a judge who later sentenced him to one day in jail and a $500. fine for contempt of court. He could have received thirty days (Prosecutorial Indiscretion, 2008).…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In her open statement on the sexual harassment hearings, Anita Hill recounts the details of how Judge Clarence Thomas took advantage of working relationship between them and conducted inappropriate sexually offensive behaviors toward her. Although Hill does not feel comfortable to reveal her vulnerability, she keeps a very formal and constraining tone while she illustrates in details of the process in which Judge Thomas intentionally ignored her refusal on his innumerable invitations to social outings. Admitting to having poor judgement, Hill is still trying to portray a despicable and heinous character of Judge Clarence, and proves to the court that his illegitimate action deserves punishment.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marco Rubio Case

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Florida Senator Marco Rubio admits he finds the State Department’s response to the attacks on the diplomats in Cuba “ridiculous,” in an interview that took place on Sunday, October 1st, with CBS correspondent John Dickerson.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jim McGreevy and James Craig deny their accusation deny their conduct and commonly accuse the opposite for insult their public figures and I don’t think American public should know anyone’s personally life. Professor I can tell you that American is not what it used to be, you are not allow to fight back anymore everyone have been selfish and extremely scare of others. Think of what this country used to be, I would say yes in the 90s about American should know their elected officials personally life but not anymore. Why would you ever interfere with other personal’s business? They are elected because of you, you should give space and respect for their privacy. Don’t you have any other things to do? Is that what we all about now? Talking other…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Metaltom

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) Giles Corey is expelled from the court because he won’t tell the court the name of his informant which is also why Daneforth won’t hear his evidence. He was arrested because of contempt the court.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jay Wilds was the lead witness and testifier for the state of Maryland against Adnan…

    • 1477 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virginia V Black

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All three men were convicted and they all appealed. Eventually all three cases were combined and brought in front of the US Supreme Court.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All three arrests took place last week, resulting from joint investigations by the Suffolk County District Attorney Insurance Crime Unit, the New York State Insurance Department Frauds Bureau, the Workers' Compensation Board Fraud Inspector General's Office and NYSIF's Division of Confidential Investigations.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gienapp, William E. The Crime Against Sumner: The Caning of Charles Sumner and the Rise of the Republican Party. Civil War History pp. 218-245. September 1979.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lgbt History

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nothing happened to the boys, the matter was dropped, no one knows why they were not punished or reported on.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Sharon Yeagle was the assistant to the Vice President of Student Affairs at the Polytechnic Institute and State University. Her job included aiding students in their applications to the Governor’s Fellows Program, an academic honors program. The Collegiate Times, the university’s newspaper, printed an article that included a large print block quotation that described Yeagle as the “Director of Butt Licking”. Yeagle sued the newspaper claiming that the phrase defamed her since that the act described is a violation of the state sodomy statue, thus accusing Yeagle of a crime that she didn’t commit. She claimed that the phrase harmed her reputation by associating her with a lack of integrity and deviancy. The trial court dismissed the case claiming that the phrase was not defamation, and Yeagle appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court (Calhoun).…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays