Between Han China in 206 BCE- 220 CE and Imperial Rome in 31 BCE-476 CE they had many similarities and differences about political control. The key similarities being how they both had one ruler, and passing on titles; the key differences being how Rome was slightly more democratic than China and how the Roman Church had more power. There were many similar political methods between Han China and Rome both had only ruler. Both empires were ruled under a tyranny. By being ruled over by one king it meant that whatever the emperor says goes. The citizens had less of a choice. Secondly, both empires’ kings trusted the higher social class to give them advice. For example, the Han China emperors would listen to the eunuchs and scholars for advice while the Roman emperors listen to the aristocracy. Having the emperors’ trust gave them the power and they can take advantage by making laws that benefits them. Another similarity is how they both passed on their power to their heirs. From father to son they would pass on their titles as emperor. They wouldn’t pass on their title and let another family take power willingly. The differences between Han China and Rome’s political methods include religion, democracy and social classes. Confucianism played a major part In Chinese culture and politics however their religion did not have as much power over the power over the emperor like Christianity. In Rome, if an emperor did not listen to the Pope, the Pope can then ex- communicate the emperor. The Pope can then replace the emperor. In China, you can’t just have a Buddhist remove an emperor out of power. Secondly, in Rome the citizens had more of a democratic government. Landowners and merchants formed the Roman Republic where they could help pass laws and etc. In China only the emperor had that kind of power. By having a more democratic government the Roman citizens can have more of a say whereas the Chinese citizens can’t. Lastly, in China if you were born into the lower class does not necessarily mean you can’t rise up. They have a civil service exam where they have a chance to become a scholar. However in Rome it is almost impossible to rise up. It is nearly impossible in Rome because you have to be a landowner to rise, but if you are born poor you don’t own any land and you have to work for a landowner. Han China and Imperial Rome had many similarities and differences regarding political methods. They had many similarities like emperors and how they passed on titles, but they also had many differences like how Rome was slightly more democratic and the Roman church had more power.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
After a brief brush of decentralization and the experience of inclusive centralization, China evolved into its most extensive and influential period: Han China. Imperial Rome used the more traditional Republic methods to also grow to be one of the most influential and powerful empires of the classical world. While China differed with Rome on the roots of change and therefore their approach to governing, the want to expand and centralize government could only be achieved through similar paths of trade and domination.…
- 514 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Another political difference involves the use of a language. Han China had the standard language of Mandarin which kept the civilization more together and unified as a whole. India did not have a standard language at all. They did have the use for Sanskrit but this was mainly reserved for the elite only. Again this political method kept India more apart than Han China.…
- 537 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
While European Rome and Asian Han Dynasty China were unique civilizations in their own ways, they did happen to share a lot of qualities between each other. A couple of the similarities were their monarchy-run governments - both placed a single person (an emperor) in charge of the respective empire, both of them had were originally made up of many different kingdoms in their countries with one ending up controlling the rest, they both used lots of agriculture in their economies, and both Rome and Han China gradually deteriorated after long rules.…
- 180 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Han China and Imperial Rome's government were similar due to the fact that they were ruled under one central leader. Han China had an emperor, who would enforce policies. Imperial Rome had a republic because they felt as though a monarchy did no good to the people. Although, the Senate of Rome had most of the power over the citizens. The differences between their rule was that in Han China the lower class citizens did not have any say on how they were ruled, while in Imperial Rome the plebeians, ordinary people, had representatives in the Senate, tribunes. Another difference between Han China and Imperial Rome is that, in Han China the emperor was chosen through family(hereditary), while in Rome they chose their ruler.…
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…
- 644 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The aftermath of the fall of Han China was much different than that of Imperial Rome. After Han China collapsed, and the barbarians invaded, the region was in chaos for around 350 years. Despite that, China was reassembled under new dynasties and they remained an empire until the early 20th century. On the contrary, the Roman Empire was broken up and integrated into new civilizations and combined with many other ideals. Nevertheless, the Roman Empire never rose again in any form. The effect of these empires collapse was the biggest difference in the fall of Han China and Imperial Rome.…
- 887 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When Han China and Imperial Rome are compared, one can find both similarities and differences in terms of techniques of imperial administration. A similarity would be that both are bureaucracies. However, both are also different. One major difference is that Han China had the civil service exams. They also differed because Han China had a much greater emphasis on religion than the Romans. These differences led to very different futures for the two empires, both of which were among the strongest in the world at the time.…
- 568 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han dynasty and Roman Empire are somewhat similar and also have some differences. Both civilizations have very strong central governments which allowed for powerful and expanding kingdoms. One of the main differences between the two empires was their religions. The Roman Empire and Han dynasty were has lots of inventions and technology. Roman and Han dynasty built major roads to help support a growing dependence on trade. In Han dynasty women were had limited to domestic activities. They also have arranged marriages. Whereas in roman dynasty women had right to do everything.…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
These two giant empires were able to reach great heights, but they differed in origin. The Han Dynasty was created when Liu Bang pulled the state back together after the near collapse of the Qin dynasty. (Dunn and Mitchell 202) Rome had a much more humble beginning. “When Rome emerged as a republican city-state in late sixth century B.C.E., the peoples of Italy were mostly farmers.”(Dunn and Mitchell 193) These contrasting origins forced these empires to use different methods to maintain their rule.…
- 342 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although China has many dynasties, the Han and Ming dynasty were similar in some ways when founded. The Han dynasty followed confucianism. Their leader was a peasant, but then became emperor. The government leaders were fair, honest and kind. This made the dynasty a much better place.…
- 240 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Both Han China and Imperial Rome had a political system structure consisting of a sovereign emperor who made executive, almost dictator-like, decisions and directed the affairs of the empire. However, in both empires, emperors relied on regional governors to regulated affairs in their respective regions due to the fact that both empires were so massive and consisted of an enormous population.…
- 733 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
While the Roman and the Han empires were similar, they also differed. The households within both empires were run very differently. In the Roman households, they enforced a concept of pater familias, meaning the eldest male in the house would rule, this is also passed down through generations. Where as in the Han, they followed a Confucian quality,…
- 459 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In comparing the Qin and Han Dynasties, both are easily recognizable with the Conrad Demarest Model of Empires however, both have easily recognize differences such as, the administrating of powers, the fall of the empire, and ideologies. Both dynasties match up with the Conrad Demarest Model of Empires. The Qin Dynasty had all of the necessary preconditions for the rise of an empire. The Han Dynasty had some necessary preconditions for the rise of an empire, but not all. It did have a main reason for falling, a revolution. By definition, both dynasties were empires.…
- 488 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The factors that contributed to the demise of the Roman empire and the Han empire have elements that are the same. The Roman government became less effective due to struggles over who was going to be in power. Twenty-six barrack emperors came and fell from power in a short period of time. Each of these emperors was violently displaced by the general who wanted to be the emperor of Rome next. This is no way to keep government control stable. The constant power struggle led to the government officials being more focused on how to become the next emperor then how to run the…
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Dynasty is one of, if not the most successful, dynasties in all of China’s history. The Hans ruled for just over four centuries, one of the longest of the Chinese dynasties. The Hans were preceded by China’s first dynasty, the Qin. The Hans came to power after Emperor Gaozu, Liu Bang, a peasant, defeated the last rebellion against him. As far as power and prestige goes, the Han Dynasty rivaled the Roman Empire. The Han Dynasty ruled in what is thought to be the golden age, which many dynasties can be traced back to. It was also considered to be an inspiring united empire and an unfathomable government.…
- 458 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays