Preview

Hamiltonians Vs Jefferson Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1328 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hamiltonians Vs Jefferson Analysis
APUSH
11/7/13
DBQ #3: Hamiltonians VS Jeffersonians/Madisonians Alexander Hamilton was the sculptor who chiseled the rough edges of America’s economy away. He was the essential part in the plan to solve the massive war debt after the revolution. As a strong federalist, he had views that he and his party shared and were deemed fit for the refinement of America’s economy. Thomas Jefferson was his eternal rival in terms of views. Along with James Madison, Jefferson was the polar opposite to Hamilton. The two past presidents seemed to be rigid with their views concerning political strategies the United States was taking in its early decades. These men before their presidencies were rock solid anti-federalist. However, Jefferson and Madison
…show more content…
In 1791 Hamilton argued that a National Bank would be of great benefit to the economy and would be the keystone of his plan for economic refinement. Jefferson was against it in every aspect.(Document A) Thomas’s logic was that the written constitution was not a wall of rules for the states but rather a wall to contain the federal government. Thomas perceived it as the confines the federal government had to work within; no more no less. Madison described it as a constitutional charter of constructs.(Document C) Thomas debates that the powers left unaddressed by the constitution are given to the states; Thomas uses the tenth amendment as evidence for his argument against the national bank.(Document A) However, a national bank is set up anyways, but it expires once its twenty charter is up. Hamilton wanted a consistent neutrality for the United States to express internationally as part of his plan. Britain was a crucial trade partner with America and would be needed once peacetime had begun and routine trade could begin. Jefferson and Madison believed isolation was the proper way to go; even in 1808 Jefferson passed the Embargo Act shutting all trade ports to other countries.(Document F) Jefferson saw trade as a source of conflict and a gateway to wars, which was not wrong. Alexander wanted neutrality to keep international trade so the economy would thrive. Jefferson was already in favor of complete isolation from any other country in any sort of manner.(Document D) Jefferson would argue against Hamilton over the topic of isolation versus neutrality. Jefferson believed that international trade and tariffs were unnecessary to the nation however tariffs were strongly supported by the federalists.(Document H) These taxes federalists would pass were planned to help pay for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The political and economic views of Hamiltonian Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans differed in terms of centralized or state governments, acts passed by congress, American liberty, and industries. Later on when the Republican party dominated the government after the War of 1812, their original ideals started to blend in with Federalists’ and the lines blurred.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson were chosen Apart from it being his priority to keep positive relationships with other countries, Jefferson kept good communication with France after Genet’s misfortune. Even after “the Terror” in France, Jefferson stood by the beliefs and actions of France. Hamilton was a Federalist that in the now would be referred to Republicans. The ideas were similar to those of Europe, allowing for Federal Government to have more control and a monarchy control.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Jefferson’s presidency, he implemented an embargo that required a strong central government to enforce.(Doc F) As a result of the embargo, manufacturing grew more rapidly under Jefferson than that of the federalist leader. With the band of trade, America became dependent on nation made products which helped grow the manufacturing industry drastically. By 1812, John Adams began to approve of the two Republican presidents’ restoration of the taxes and the Navy.(Doc G) Jefferson had restored taxes while he held office, while Madison worked on building back up the Navy. Even though the Founding Fathers were both finding a moderate ground, others were not adjusting. During both presidencies, the tariffs kept and enforced were disliked by some Republicans. Southern Democratic-Republican farmers rejected the protective tariff created by Madison because it lead to higher prices.(Doc H) These tariffs were set by Hamilton, and enhanced by Republican…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He sought to use Britain’s economic model to create a nation that would one day be as influential as Britain. To do this, Hamilton would have to create a federal bank that would handle the economy and fund a strong government. He knew the United States would have secure currency that everyone trusted if the Bank of the United States was authorized. Hamilton believed that a bank was necessary for the advancement of the U.S. He said. “The powers contained in a constitution. . . ought to be construed liberally in advancement of the public good.” Jefferson had quite the opposite views on the Bank of the United States. He was against the idea of the bank because it would centralize powers in the big northern cities. Jefferson also feared that the banks would only benefit the rich. He did not believe that Congress had the power to create the Bank of the Unites States. Jefferson defended his beliefs by saying, “The second general phrase is to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the enumerated powers. But they can all be carried into execution without a bank. A bank therefore is not necessary, and consequently not authorized by this phrase”. Hamilton and Jefferson also…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which made their rivalry even more intense. Hamilton was an intense Federalist in favor of a very powerful federal government. Madison was a Democratic-Republican, so he was in favor of states rights. Burr was a little different, he mostly cared about how to gain power and once joined the other party to improve his chances of becoming president he stayed with Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans for most of his political career. The first rift between Hamilton and Jefferson started when they were selected to serve as cabinet members, Hamilton as Treasury secretary and Jefferson as Secretary of State. Since they had such wildly different viewpoints they often fought. Hamilton, a very egotistical person, sometimes even called a narcissist, attacked Jefferson’s character to demean him during cabinet meetings. Burr and Hamilton were both very well known public figures who were even friends until Burr ran for a Senate seat and beat out Hamilton's father in law. In the article Mr. Kennedy explains how he believes this wasn't a direct act of aggression to Hamilton, as some historians believe, showing just one claim of bias in this analysis. Burr and Jefferson's conflict started in the election of 1800. To make it brief, The voting process was different back then. Jefferson and Burr tied for the most votes and instead of stepping aside for Jefferson, Burr made an attempt at the Presidency. And in order to break the tie, Hamilton endorsed Jefferson, which made electors swing their vote to Jefferson, breaking the tie. This was just one reason Burr challenged Hamilton to duel. Hamilton saw Jefferson as the lesser of two evils, even going as far as saying Burr was a “mischievous enemy.” The 18th century equivalent of calling someone a liar and a fraud on television today. These three men disliked each other a great deal and showed it to the press, and to one…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson have different views about the future of America, but they both and intensions to better America by 1794. Hamilton believed in the government getting stronger with the rise of large corporations that can help provided jobs. Jefferson wanted to weaken the central government, and empower the states governments. Which view was more realistic and created a more secure system? With the Hamilton and Jefferson conflict, this helped raise political parties to decide what is good for the United States of America. Each view needed the other to create a government that would be strong enough to protect itself from its people and from external strife.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Essay Contest 2007-2008 - Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Whose Economic Vision Was Better? | The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis." Essay Contest 2007-2008 - Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Whose Economic Vision Was Better? | The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. .…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Two men who have played a major role in shaping our nation. Like most influential men of that time, their ideas did not always flow in the same direction. Although Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton butted heads, they established many of today’s ideals. This essay will describe Jefferson and Hamilton, describe how they shaped the political divide as well as why we credit them with the beginning of the two political parties of today.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was a federalist who believed in a strong central government. Thomas Jefferson was a democratic republican who wanted states to have strong power. Hamilton and Jefferson were competing to get their way. Hamilton point of view was best for America. Hamilton want the best for the country not for himself, he wanted to help bring upon a good strong federal government, and he thought that Jefferson was to dangerous for the country.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens of the United States were found to be divided into two separate political groups during the ratification of the United States Constitution. The first group, the Federalist Party, having a nationalistic view, favored a strong central government, restricting powers of the states. However, the Republican Party believed that the power of the national government should be limited and the states be given additional power. Many different issues occurred between the two parties, however the debate on the first national bank, the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, and the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, establish why the republican party adopted these views on the government. The republican party felt that definite rights should be reserved by…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton understood that a strong central government would be needed to keep the fledgling country alive. In order to keep a strong government that understood the problems at hand, it needed to be run by first class, educated men. Hamilton also makes a good point in saying that, though Jeffersonians thought the rich would corrupt the government in order to profit for themselves, the rich had nothing to gain as they were already at the top of the social ladder. Whiele Hamilton was a realist, Jefferson was a romantic. He lagged…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two of the most influential brilliant minds of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. Although, Jefferson and Hamilton disagreed with each other continually, their different viewpoints developed the two most prominent branches of government leading to the separation of powers between state and central government. Hamilton was a strong outspoken federalist that believed the average people were not intelligent enough to make decisions the government makes, as oppose to Jefferson who believed the government should be ran by the people.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton's Vision

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jefferson’s views differed substantially from Hamilton’s. As Hamilton went on his quest for economic development and superiority of the U.S, Jefferson always dreamed of a society ran by independent yeoman farm families. Jefferson attracted members of the south as southern society relied heavily on farming as opposed to the industrial north. Jefferson’s perspective may differ from Hamilton’s but that doesn’t mean Jefferson’s perspective was wrong. During the turmoil in Europe with the French Revolution, and the First French Republic’s war against the British-led coalition of monarchies, European farming was heavily disrupted and called for the importation of American crops. In addition, with the invention of the cotton gin, American cotton production skyrocketed as production efficiency increased substantially. This division between Hamiltonian Federalists and Jefferson’s Democratic Republican will lay the foundation of a 2 party dominant political system in the U.S for generations to…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, one of the most important people of the time, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Utilizing federal power to modernize the nation, he convinced Congress to use an elastic interpretation of the Constitution to pass laws that Jefferson deemed unconstitutional. These laws included federal assumption of the state debts, creation of a national bank, and a system of taxes through a tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey. Hamilton was also the creator of the Federalist Party. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson was born to a wealthy family but was nonetheless an anti-federalist. He was sympathetic towards the poor people and advocated state’s rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Founding Fathers

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Founding Fathers helped ratify the Constitution at the Constitutional Convention. Some of the Founding Fathers towards the Constitution were Thomas Jefferson, and Alexander Hamilton. Both men had very strong beliefs about what should be done to help approve the Constitution and what should've not been done. Hamilton was a strong supporter of the Constitution. He had a broad or "loose" interpretation of the Constitution. Hamilton believed that federal government had wide-ranging powers due to the clause allowing Congress to make any "which shall be necessary and proper." Jefferson accepted the Constitution, but was concerned the president was too powerful. He promoted the Bill of Rights to protect individual rights. Also he had a narrow "strict" interpretation of the Constitution, and believed that powers not specifically given to the federal government belonged "to the states respectively, or to the people." The constitutional issue was that all the Founding Fathers had many different suggestions and opinions, so it took a while for all these men to come to an agreement. This brought many issues and arguments during the process. One of the arguments were the national bank system which was apart of Hamilton's economic plan. The national bank was to win support of the business community, and help out the government in financial dealings. The bank funded by both federal government and wealthy investors which issued paper money and other government funds. Hamilton and the Federalists supported the national bank because they believed it would encourage investors and business community to support the government. On the other hand,…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays