Preview

Jefferson and Hamilton: Friendship and Conflict among the Founding Fathers

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
701 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jefferson and Hamilton: Friendship and Conflict among the Founding Fathers
Patriots Pen Draft One If you were to paint a portrait of the Founding Father 's from the average American 's mind, the final result would depict a group of heroic men marching into battle, defeating the dastardly British, and writing the Constitution all in one sitting. Everything would be tinted with rosy hues of red, white, and blue, and patriotic music sounds in the background…right? Wrong. In 1789, a passionate disagreement broke out between Jefferson and Hamilton over the French Revolution. Jefferson and his Republican supporters were in favor of joining the revolutionaries, while Hamilton and the Federalists called for a neutral stance in relation to the fighting. This lead to the bisection of a previously cooperative government into two warring parties. In 1804, Hamilton, who had a disagreement with Jefferson 's vice-president Aaron Burr, agreed to a duel in the outskirts of Weehawken, New Jersey. While Hamilton had reservations about actually firing, Burr did not. He drew his gun and promptly shot Hamilton in the abdomen. Hamilton died the next day. In 1808, the Founding Fathers supposedly ended the slave trade by passing legislation eradicating slavery in all the states north of the Potomac and prohibiting the expansion of slavery into the Northwest Territory. However, they turned a blind eye to the states south of the Potomac, where nine-tenths of the slaves resided. The bloody Civil War ultimately resulted, leading to the deaths of at least 618,000 young American men. There is endless evidence to be heaped upon the growing pile of failures. Of 21 Founding Fathers studied, 14 had owned slaves. This slaveholders included people such as Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington. Besides Hamilton, two other Founding Fathers were killed in duels. Countless petty arguments resulted in wide fissures of disagreement. In light of all this, what would I say? Thank you. The Founding Fathers were not perfect


Cited: "Casualties In The Civil War." Casualties In The Civil War. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Did the Founding Fathers Screw Up?" The American Prospect. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Essay Contest 2007-2008 - Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Whose Economic Vision Was Better? | The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis." Essay Contest 2007-2008 - Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Whose Economic Vision Was Better? | The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "The Founding Fathers and Slavery (Founding Fathers)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "The Founding Fathers Fallacy." Penn Political Review. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Friendship and Conflict: The Relationship of the U.S. "Founding Fathers"" Student Pulse. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . " ." Our Founding Fathers Sacrificed for the United States of America. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . "Political Battles." Political Battles. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Founding Brothers Summary

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Founding Brothers is a historical non-fiction, centering on key moments both in post-revolutionary America and in the lives of the Founding Fathers. Joseph J. Ellis examines how the individual relationships of the Founding Fathers influenced or were influenced by the unsettled period in which they lived. This book uses the lenses of hindsight and foresight to understand both what these men went through and how history has come to understand them.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Battle of Valley Forge

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Raphael, Ray. Founding myths: stories that hide our patriotic past. New York: New Press :, 2004.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The point of the Joseph Ellis writing this book was is to expose the reader to historical events that would eventually lead up to the formation of the United States government’s present and future generations. He achieves this point by exploring and speaking about the challenges that the founding…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book being critiqued in the following review is Founding Brothers by Joseph Ellis. Ellis’ goal in writing this book was to define the political events and achievements that gained historical significance because they framed the successive history of the United States. Ellis wrote on this specific topic because he felt the need to argue the fact that the American Revolution and the greatness achieved by the founding generation were the result of a collective effort. Ellis emphasizes that the success of the United States, at the time of its formation, was not an inevitable conclusion. At the time, it was an improbable result that was eventually achieved by a small group of distinguished political leaders that collectively built and shaped the United States. The American Revolution’s true success was achieved because of the personal and ideological diversity within the mix that produced a sort of balanced system that sets the American Revolution apart from all other subsequent revolutions.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Much like my peers and I in the eighth grade, our forefathers who assembled 226 years ago were faced with a daunting task for the state that they were in. At this point in our history, America was a newborn in the world, only eleven years of age. Now left without the common cause that the Revolutionary War provided for the prior two decades, the former colonies struggled to find any sense of unity, and the world watched like adults watching an infant not their own attempt to stand upright on two feet without any assistance. Or perhaps a better metaphor would be an infant attempting to stand on his hands; Americans not only had to erect a lasting government system, but create one unlike any other. But the United States was by no means hopeless. Our founding fathers had already put forth one…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The founding fathers, or as the book calls them the founding brothers, are an assorted group of men from wildly different backgrounds. In political terms, they were divided. Yet, they came to together to help shape this country into the place it is today. Now on their journey towards the making of this country they did encounter some trouble. They encountered heated debates among themselves though for getting through these debates they show just why they deserve to be called, founding brothers.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton Ideals

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were rivals and both influential men in the Revolutionary war and in the creation of the new government. Both had multiple roles in the formation of the new government and both men were instrumental in the success of the new government, but held different political beliefs. These ideals and differences were the foundation of the first two major political parties.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was the sculptor who chiseled the rough edges of America’s economy away. He was the essential part in the plan to solve the massive war debt after the revolution. As a strong federalist, he had views that he and his party shared and were deemed fit for the refinement of America’s economy. Thomas Jefferson was his eternal rival in terms of views. Along with James Madison, Jefferson was the polar opposite to Hamilton. The two past presidents seemed to be rigid with their views concerning political strategies the United States was taking in its early decades. These men before their presidencies were rock solid anti-federalist. However, Jefferson and Madison…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company" (George Washington). America wouldn't be what it is today if the Founding Fathers didn't feel the same as George Washington did. Britain was bad company and the Founding Fathers felt that America was better off alone, and as its own country. The Founding Fathers were completely just in the way that they separated themselves from Britain, and had every reason to do so.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader and converting measures in opposition to each other. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."1 This view, expressed by John Adams, was not shared by all, namely Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. As the early American government began to form, so did the two major political parties. Alexander Hamilton was the founder of the Federalist Party, while Thomas Jefferson led the Anti-Federalists in response.2 Both men used their prominence in each party to their advantage to influence the public and their disputes created controversy and discordance between the parties and the American people. Hamilton and Jefferson had many disagreements throughout their careers and had radically different opinions on what their new country should be like.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the term “Founding Fathers” ring a bell? Warren G. Harding was the first man on record to refer to the first statesmen of America as the “Founding Fathers;” over fifty years after the last American Revolutionary soldier had died (Bernstein pg. 4). How interesting that this common term that we associate George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, just to name a few, was not such a common term. R.B. Bernstein’s The Founding Fathers Reconsidered, gives us a different view of what we associate “Founding Fathers” to be. All of the founders showed an outstanding ability to adapt not only to unstable environments during the birth of a nation, but to their political environment as well. The author's primary argument was in fact that all the "Fathers" did not get along and share the same views.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander is an orphan who was born in a small island. Even though the odds were against him, that didn’t keep Hamilton from succes. Alexander Hamilton was a pioneer. Hamilton created many things, but he didn’t get to reach his full potential because his life ended in a duel. Therefore, I believe that Hamilton is an extraordinary founding father, and he may be one of the top three founding fathers. First, I will first present the background of Alexander Hamilton. I will give the reader all the information about Hamilton’s path to his succes. After I present Hamilton’s biography, I will begin the argument of why Hamilton is an important founding father. I will support my theories with scholarly sources. The sources will be retrieved from a…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard was a historian and political scientist who wrote the book “An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution.” Beard argued that “to understand the Constitution we must understand the economic interests of the national elite, which included the writers of the Constitution.” (144). In this essay, I will discuss Charles Beard and his assertion about the Founding Fathers and the Constitution.…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The founders had faults and the skills of each member were dramatically overstated and overdone. Washington was not a perfect person nor was he the greatest general, yet he is according to the writers the perfect human. Many leaders owned slaves but not viewed at the time of the Brothers Jonathon to be a very important detail worth relating, this being due to the attitudes of racism present in the writer’s selves. It is important to note that the writers, editors and illustrators represented the higher class white point of view. Just as the Founding Father would have. Not giving women, native Americans, blacks, and poor the right to vote was a conscious choice of theirs. Americans from every walk of life would have and still do view the founding fathers as gods, and all those who opposed them as devil. The black and white nature of this reasoning contributes to the effect overall. Causing an us versus them mentality and adding to the already present nationalism in the United States. This has been occurring since the inception. A process now addressed in present day and met with much resistance. A process that brings about more divide and more hate. The nationalism that was propagated in the 19th century is and may always will be a part of the United States, but historical analysis offers a look into the causes and truth of the past. Only then will the truth of the present be open to…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Founding Brothers

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Joseph Ellis’s book, Founding Brothers, Ellis takes an extensive look at how the Founding Fathers established the American republic and how six instances demonstrate the most prominent issues that faced the new fragile nation. He poses the question, “How, then, did they do it?” [16] Ellis answers his question with four common themes that put all six events in relation to each other. The first one was that “the achievement of the revolutionary generation was a collective enterprise that succeeded because of the diversity of personalities and ideologies present in the mix.” [17] Second, all the politicians knew one another. Politics were face-to-face and the political leaders met with each other personally. [17] Third they took slavery, the most threatening issue off the agenda. [17] The fourth and final theme was that the politicians knew they were making history on which their reputation would rest. Knowing that people were watching them kept them on their best behavior. [18] Ellis ties his points together in a way that helps illustrate logic among the scattered principles that the Founding Brothers established for this young nation.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays