Preview

Gun Control Laws Case Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
368 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Laws Case Summary
Antonin Scalia and the Reporter of Decisions. (2005). The Right to Own a Gun Is Guaranteed by the Constitution. In K. Doyle (Ed.), At Issue. Is Gun Ownership a Right? San Diego: Greenhaven Press.
In March 2008 the second amendment was reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the District of Columbia et al v. Heller case. The court stated that the second amendment allowed people to own guns. They concluded that the District of Columbia’s ban on guns was unconstitutional. The ban made it a crime to have an unregistered gun. The ban also required lawful guns to be stored unloaded and unassembled or have a trigger lock on it. The second amendment has limits though. These bans violate the second amendment.
Wright, S. E. (2012). Gun Control Laws

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    District of Columbia did not allow him to have a weapon for self defence without a lock or safe. The case made the supreme court thoroughly review the second amendment to see if it allowed us to keep a weapon our home unregistered for self defence. Although the second amendment does not allow anyone to carry an unregistered weapon. At the same time, Heller did have to compromise some such as Prohibit firearm possession by felons and the mentally ill, Forbid firearm possession in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, and Impose conditions on the commercial sale of firearms.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Antonin Scalia and the Reporter of Decisions. (2005). The Right to Own a Gun Is Guaranteed by the Constitution. In K. Doyle (Ed.), At Issue. Is Gun Ownership a Right?. San Diego: Greenhaven Press. (Reprinted from Syllabus, and Opinion of the Court, in Supreme Court of the United States, District of Columbia ET AL. v. Heller, pp. 1-64, 2008) Retrieved from http://ic.galegroup.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&source=&sortBy=&displayGroups=&zid=&search_within_results=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010334214…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to statelaws.findlaw.com, the District of Columbia does not allow open carry of a firearm. My definition of the Second Amendment would affect the legitimacy of the gun control law in the District of Columbia because I believe people should be allowed to openly carry…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The second amendment under the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution has protected the right of the people to keep and bear arms since 1791 (Head). It protects an individual’s right…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last several years there has been an ongoing debate on how to interpret the Second Amendment and whether or not we should have gun control. With the Second Amendment specifically grants that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The controversy of it being that in the Second Amendment doesn't specify who "the people" are. This being said it leaves room for the legislative bodies and court to pass laws and interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has caused many debates throughout the years due to the different ways in which it could be interpreted. Most federal appeals courts have said that, when read as a whole, this amendment protects only the rights of the militia to bear arms. However, on a decision made on March 8, 2007, the majority focused on the second clause, saying that the amendment protects the rights of individual people to own firearms as well. The decision was made in a federal appeals court in Washington to strike down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that made it impossible for residents to keep handguns in their homes. The court ruled that banning the right to own firearms was a violation of the Second Amendment.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Case Study

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Currently there are no laws or regulations in place that require private sales, gun show sales or internet sales to perform a background check during a firearm purchase unlike federally licensed firearm dealers. This leaves a loophole open for criminals to purchase firearms leading to more gun violence such as mass shooting and robberies. Gun violence can be reduced by requiring background checks for all guns sales, expanding background checks to include mental health status, and better reporting by law enforcement agencies to maintain accurate information in the database.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has brought up major arguments in American politics ever since 1876. Was it meant to insure that people in general have arms for personal safety, or was it to insure arms for the military service only? Gun control in America has its pros and cons, but the nation needs to decide which way the government goes on this topic because more school shootings will occur and terrorists can still get there hands on them.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control laws are just as old or older than the Second Amendment authorized in 1791. On June 26, 2008 the District of Columbia v. Heller US Supreme Court majority estimation, Justice Antonin Scalia, LLB, said “ like most rights, the right secures by the Second Amendment is not unlimited; from Blackstone through the 19th century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatsoever purpose and nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibition on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Second Amendment is a big part of gun control. The second amendment is a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Second Amendment states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (US Const., amend. 2). The amendment was adopted for a number of reasons, ranging from wanting to give U.S. residents the right to protect themselves in case the government waged war against the people, and the right to provide for their families by hunting with firearms, to ensuring their right to defend their homes against invaders. Basically, the second amendment was mainly put in place for our protection. The 2008 Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, upheld that right (No. 7-290. Supreme Ct. of the US. 26 June 2008). The Court 's ruling led to the lifting of a ban on handguns that had existed for 32 years. In an interview with the Washington Post, Lawyer Alan Gura noted that there had been "all sorts of predictions that there would be blood on the streets and carnage and all…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On one hand, some people believe that the wording “the right of people to keep and bear arms” creates the constitutional right for individuals to possess firearms. On the other hand, some believe that the use of “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state” only inhibits Congress from enacting legislation that limits a state’s right to self-defense. Clearly, the Second Amendment does grant citizens the right to bear arms, but many people have began to question this due to the increasing gun violence in the…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays