Preview

Gun Control Informative Essay

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1437 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Informative Essay
Informative essay

The United States is in a controversy of whether or not the Second Amendment is protecting our country or killing it. The United States owns approximately 250 million guns, nearly one for each citizen, and grows about 7 million each year. Experts believe that the Second Amendment in the Constitution is rational and legal, author of, Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment Don B. Kates states that the “Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that weapon for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home; however, they do not say that you can go around shooting people and claiming that you are protected by the Second Amendment. According to CNN news, the Second Amendment is loosely written, holding loop holes that others seem to find, such as Benjamin Ferguson, who bought a silencer which “falls into the same category of Tiltle II weapons as rockets and machine guns” (Bordeaux).Which provide some serious problems within the people and government of the United States. One hopeful way of addressing this problem is to make gun safety course videos for the younger crowd about late elementary, early middle school, and again early high school years as a reminder, to explain that guns are not toys and can obviously cause massive destruction or serious injuries. Using the example of the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting it could hit home and open the eyes of the students to realize the damage it could cause. To what extent will these actions of prevention reduce the problems of Gun Control? Is it really truly preventable? Many people think so; however, if a larger majority of the country did then there would be no argument about the problem. In the article “The Next gun Fight” author Michael Schered talks about the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting, and how the Second Amendment isn’t exactly an amendment worth saving in the eyes



Cited: Zakaria, Fareed. "Will He Fight Or Compromise?." Time 181.6 (2013): 20. Academic Search Premier. Web. 18 Mar. 2013. SCHERED, MICHAEL. "THE NEXT GUN FIGHT. (Cover Story)." Time 181.3 (2013): 24-33. Academic Search Premier. Web. 18 Mar. 2013. Johnson, Fawn. "Gun-Buyer Background Checks Both Effective And Politically Achievable." National Journal (2013): 4. Academic Search Premier. Web. 18 Mar. 2013. Kates B Don, Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment Volume:82. Issue:2 (November 1983): Pages: 204-273. Print. Bordeaux ,Lacy. Emma. “Loophole allows for easier purchase of high-powered weapons.” CNN Radio, May 25 2011. Web. 18 March 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Second Amendment is unnecessary and should be repealed” a fair statement and one that I strongly agree with. The second amendment states that all man has the right to bear arms or own a gun. In July 4,1776 North America got its independence from the British Empire. Next our founding fathers came together and created the Bill of Rights. During the eighteenth century America was a young and newly independent country. In the 1770s they needed to demonstrate their strength as a country. Also, Americans were driven to protect their lands from countries that have a stronger government and army. But in this century,America is a stronger country with a very strong army and government. Considering that American now has a strong military with…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last several years there has been an ongoing debate on how to interpret the Second Amendment and whether or not we should have gun control. With the Second Amendment specifically grants that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The controversy of it being that in the Second Amendment doesn't specify who "the people" are. This being said it leaves room for the legislative bodies and court to pass laws and interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amending the Constitution, including amending an amendment, is a necessary task in order to fit the needs that America has today. Many debates have been started in relation to the amount of violence that is associated with guns. There is such easy access to them now that there have been too many issues. There is not a need for people to bring the task of protecting themselves with high-powered weaponry when there are trained officers now. People in support of the Second Amendment argue that they needs weapons to protect themselves from the government, when violent forms of protest are not allowed. Overall, the Second Amendment in the United States Constitution needs to be amended in order to suffice for the type of America there is…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years now our country has been in a heated debate on the second amendment. Some people feel that it is not safe to let citizens have and carry guns, while others agree it is their right as an american to own a gun. In America, there are approximately 270 million firearms possessed by civilians, and only 897,000 carried by police.Close to 33,000 Americans were victims of gun-related deaths in 2011 and an average of 268 citizens are shot every day. In the past decade our country has witnessed 142 mass school shootings and, in 2010 alone 19,392 people committed suicide with a gun. These frightening statistic are what I believe cuz some people to be against the second amendment.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dreier, Peter. "Massacres And Movements: Challenging The Gun Industrial Complex." New Labor Forum (Murphy Institute) 22.2 (2013): 92-95. Academic Search Complete. Web. 10 Dec. 2013…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nra Gun Reform

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Our Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights had created a virtual war over guns and gun ownership in the United States for more than two centuries. It reads The Second Amendment provides: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It is the only amendment written with a purported purpose. The only one with a preamble or perhaps an observation that; a well-regulated militia is a necessity for the security of a free state, and an objective or a legality that: the right…

    • 3265 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has brought up major arguments in American politics ever since 1876. Was it meant to insure that people in general have arms for personal safety, or was it to insure arms for the military service only? Gun control in America has its pros and cons, but the nation needs to decide which way the government goes on this topic because more school shootings will occur and terrorists can still get there hands on them.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Someone needs to step back and stop thinking so rigidly. Is following the Constitution word for word worth the lives of innocent children? Someone must also question the amount of "self-defense" a gun provides, when a person carrying a gun is four times more likely to be shot and killed than a normal person. Though some understand that the Second Amendment is a civil right and plainly stated in the Constitution. Is it too much to ask to limit this freedom in a safer environment where people do not have to constantly worry about crazed gunmen. After all, some people would never want to be in a country where they are constantly in danger of being…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Second Amendment states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (US Const., amend. 2). The amendment was adopted for a number of reasons, ranging from wanting to give U.S. residents the right to protect themselves in case the government waged war against the people, and the right to provide for their families by hunting with firearms, to ensuring their right to defend their homes against invaders. Basically, the second amendment was mainly put in place for our protection. The 2008 Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, upheld that right (No. 7-290. Supreme Ct. of the US. 26 June 2008). The Court 's ruling led to the lifting of a ban on handguns that had existed for 32 years. In an interview with the Washington Post, Lawyer Alan Gura noted that there had been "all sorts of predictions that there would be blood on the streets and carnage and all…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Here is my first reason why gun control can help reduce gun deaths and help put an end to mass shootings. look at this procon.org said that from 1999 to 2013 gun deaths were the 12th leading cause of death over liver disease, Parkinson’s, drowning, fire, and machine deaths. Also, The New York times said that more than 17% of mass shooting the guns were obtained legally with federal background checks and at least eight of the gunman were had criminal records or mental health problems. Plus, bought multiple rounds of ammo or guns at a time or at once and…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    More Gun Control or Less?

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    SHERED, MICHAEL. “ THE NEXT GUN FIGHT. (Cover Story).” Time 181.3 (2012): 24-33. Academic Search Premier. Web. 3 Mar. 2013…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Gun Control

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second amendment of the Constitution says, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Analysis of this clause varies depending on how one wants to interpret. For example, someone who views the amendment with the original intent of the framers’ might view the amendment as the states being able to rise up against the possibility of tyranny. If the president dispersed Congress and take away the State’s voice and choice to pass their own laws, that would be tyranny, and a state militia would be able to rise up against it with the weapons they were allowed to have. To a person who wants to read it as the amendment is written, the right to own guns should not be infringed because citizens need a well-regulated militia to protect our liberties. The difference is that the protection against tyranny is not implied in this belief. Critics believe that the Constitution should be read and interpreted as Americans now. To which, a well regulated militia is not what citizens have. Even though citizens can have certain high powered and high magazine…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays