Preview

Guilt Or Innocence In Monster, By Walter Dean Myers

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Guilt Or Innocence In Monster, By Walter Dean Myers
In Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, the reader learns from Steve Harmon’s experiences that sometimes guilt or innocence of a person might not be determined by solid evidence but by onlooker’s opinions and interpretation of the crime. There is not a large amount of scientific evidence in the case against Steve Harmon, so the jury must rely on Steve’s background information, their opinions of guilt and innocence, and the testimonies of the witnesses who are mostly criminals. From Steve’s trial, the reader learns that a persons guilt or innocence is often determined by their status in life, even by coincidence. In a journal one of Steves entries he ponders, “What did I do? Anybody can walk into a drugstore and look around. Is that what I’m

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Steve always changes his story, telling the jury one thing but writing something else in his notebook. While on the stand, his lawyer begins to question him: “O’Brien: ‘Mr. Harmon, were you in the drugstore owned by Mr. Nesbitt, the victim, on the 22nd of December of last year?’ Steve: ‘No, I was not’”(223).…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the book continues, actions of Steve and those of others strongly suggest that Steve has done something wrong. To start off, several of Steve’s lines catch himself in a lie about his innocence. In Steve’s journal entry, he states, “I thought about writing about what happened in the drugstore, but I’d rather not have it in my mind” (Meyers 128). Steve not wanting to think about the drugstore crime suggests there is a level of guilt he is feeling. “I don’t know exactly when the robbery happened, but I know I wasn’t in the drugstore that day” (Meyers 229). While giving his testimony, Steve makes it very clear to the jury he was not in the drugstore on the day of the crime. His indecisiveness of his involvement in the crime proves Steve has committed the crime. “‘I’m not guilty,’ I said to her. ‘You should have said, ‘I didn’t do it,’ she said” (Meyers 138). Miss O’Brien, Steve’s defense attorney, seems to feel there…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In writing his novel “Monster”, Walter Dean Myers used his experience to keep the judicial system relevant to his points while still realistic. Steve’s attorney, O’Brien, is honest about her role in the system to Steve, telling him, “My job is to make sure the law works for you as well as against you.” Instead of pretending to be crusading for a not guilty verdict, O’Brien tells the truth that she intends to help hunt down the truth both for and against Steve as an unbiased tool of the court. This means that she will insure that the jury’s predispositions do not change their verdicts, that the prejudice of the court doesn’t change the evidence given in court, and that the evidence against Steve is legitimate and/or nonexistent.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his novel Monster, Walter Dean Myers demonstrates the complexity of the justice system, and how people can be tried unethically. The characters, Bobo Evans, Steve Harmon, James King, and Osvaldo Cruz all differ in magnitude of guilt and involvement, but were tried either too harsh, or let off too easily. What differs in each person’s case is attributed to biases including age, race, and cooperations with the police. The first poorly tried suspect in this felony-murder case was Osvaldo Cruz. Osvaldo is a fourteen year old boy who helped out in the robbery, but claimed it was in fear of the suspects that drove him to do this. Osvaldo gave tips to the police, helping them out with the crime. Due to this fact and his young age, he was not tried…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monster O Brien Summary

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    She gathers her papers and moves away as STEVE, arms still outstretched, turns toward he camera” (276). O’Brien literally tenses up her whole body; like she is afraid of his arms reaching out, that his blackness will consume and overpower her if she embraces him. She sees him as a man, not a boy; she sees differences and stereotypes and ignores his humanity. She, regardless of the jury’s decision, has decided he is guilty. Myer uses “pensive” to indicate that when she looks at Steve, there is some thought or conclusion she is making about her client, seemingly a look of terror or mistrust. But it is how Steve interprets it that is important: “When Miss O’Brien looked at at me, after we had won the case, what did she see that caused her to turn away? What did she see?” (281). Steve has already had feelings of worthlessness, and calling himself a “monster”. When a white female, who was supposed to be fighting for him, rejects his act of comfort and celebration, he immediately assumes that he sees what he sees: the “monster” inside of him. O’Brien, not once, believed her client was innocent. Her preconceptions of who he is overtake her ability to see past his skin color and clearly who he is, and whether he is guilty or not, he is still a teenager who obviously…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Steve Harmon Case

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After steve writes about Mrs. O’Brien thinking he is guilty he contemplates with himself of being guilty and writes, “Its growing. First i was scared of being hit or raped. That being scared was like a little ball in the pit of my stomach. Now that ball is growing when i think about the kind of time i can get.” Steve saying he is completely innocent previously and then when he's alone writing in his journal he contemplates and think about the time he can get for his crime. For this reason, Steve steve is guilty. Steve writes in his journal 5 months after he was found not guilty and thinks about why Mrs. O’Brien didn't give him a hug after they won and when she just walked away, as he writes, “When Miss O’Brien looked at me, after we had won the case, what did she see that caused her to turn away? What did she see?“ O'Brien viewed Steve as guilty despite his innocent verdict in court, and felt that she had freed a guilty person. It is implied that steve is wondering how did she know he was guilty, how did she know, what did she she that lead her to believe that he's guilty. as a result of the State of New York vs Steve harmon the jury should have clearly decided that steve harmon is guilty in the burglary and felony murder of…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the novel, Steve struggles with the thought of himself as a monster. Most people around him think he is guilty, he starts out in court admitting to what he does but nobody believes him. If he was to have killed the clerk he would have admitted it. Nobody wants to believe him just because he is black and he starts to think is he really a monster. “Maybe I could make my own movie. I could write it down and play it in my head. I could block out the scenes like we did in school. The film will be the story of my life. no , not my life, but of this experience. I'll write it down in the notebook they let me keep. I'll call it what the lady who is the prosecutor called me MONSTER.” Before they even started the whole court scene the prosecutor was already calling him a monster. This scene shows what people really think of him and why he is questioning himself. “He has been found not guilty. Steve turn toward O’BRIEN as camera closes in and film grows grainer. STEVE spreads his arms to hug O’BRIEN, but she stiffens and turns to pick up her papers from the table before them.”(p,276) This scene shows how the lawyer thinks Steve is really a monster. By the lawyer not hugging him shows that the lawyer only won the case because it's her job not because she wanted, or even believed, Steve innocent. She bassically said “i'm not hugging you, you're a…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminals are tried in our court system everyday for crimes they are accused of committing. In these court cases, witnesses are called to give an account of what happened in the particular incident and then a jury of twelve members decides the criminal's ruling on the case. The jury does not listen to just one witness; it takes into account the stories of many witnesses in order to decipher the truth. "The Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin and "Richard Cory" by Edwin Arlington Robinson show one cannot fully rely on what other people say in certain situations.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main character in the novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers is 16-year-old Steve Harmon who has been arrested and put on trial for his part in a robbery in which a convenience store owner was killed. A question that people can ask while reading this novel is, was Steve Harmon truly the lookout for the convenience story robbery or was he in the wrong place at the wrong time? Regardless, he has been arrested for his part in the crime that led to the killing of the store's owner. Through his journal writings and his movie scripts, complete with stage directions, Steve shares his story of his observations of what he sees and hears from his prison cell, and his fears as he is placed on trial and possibly facing 25 years to life in prison. During the novel there has been given pretty much all-different kinds of evidence.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Csi Effect

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In order to accurately depict how the CSI Effect strongly influences our society’s view on crime and courtroom proceedings, I will be comparing different CSI episodes to those methods and theories which apply. Throughout the paper, I will be explaining how CSI has shaped peoples’ minds in believing false claims and investigation beliefs. Watching and comparing episodes of CSI to the CSI Effect will be a prime reference in explaining how the media is placing a spin on CSI television shows.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steve experiences an internal conflict regarding the way in which he wishes to be acknowledged. In chapter five, within Steve's journal, we see Steve experiencing this desire to be seen as a good person. "...What did I do? Anybody can walk into a drugstore and look around. Is that what I am on trial for? I didn't do nothing!..." (P. 115) Here he proclaims is innocence in his jorunal. In chapter three, Steve has to deal with some strong prejudicial stereotypes that may affect jurors. For example, O' Brien's words to him are "...You're young, you're black, and you're on trial. What else do they need to know?..." (P. 78-9). Here she is saying that the jury is pre-judging him before the case is over and nothing so far is evidence as to him being innocent. Steve's sense of his self-identity is further strained when he realizes that his father is no longer sure of who he is. When Steve asks his father if he believes that Steve did nothing wrong, the father is unable to give him the reassurance he…

    • 738 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monster

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How would you like to be on trial for something you didn’t do? In Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon is on trial for felony murder. I believe that Steve Harmon is innocent because he didn’t know Bobo Evans, the store wasn’t clear, and there was no signal.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These practices of misconduct in result in dire consequences where an action of a single individual can destroy innocent individuals and further diminish public confidence in the justice system. For example, Collins & Jarvis (2009) found that the Innocence Project cited many cases where forensic scientist misconduct was a key player to the wrongful conviction. In the case of James Ochoa, even though DNA and fingerprint analysis exonerated Ochoa from the lists of suspects, the prosecutors were so convinced that he was guilty of armed robbery, that they had a forensic expert falsely testify in court on this case. Due to this, the testimony of the scientist was based solely on the interpretation and influence of the prosecutor. This argument relates to the idea of forensic testimony and the practice of fabricating or misreporting evide is a key issue that is posing a significant problem to our criminal justice system. These can include "withholding laboratory reports, analysis, or the existence of evidence. Other cases involved fabrication, including falsifying or altering lab reports and concealment of exculpatory information regarding hair comparison" (Garrett & Neufeld, 2009). For example, in William Gregory's case, a forensic analyst did not report crucial information of how at least one piece of hair did not match Gregory's. Additionally, it was determined that many cases…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Black people back then weren't treat right. Steve was accused of being the murder because he is black and any black person would do that. For example, the story says, “ Do you think I should have got a black lawyer?” she asked. “ Some of…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American justice system is one of the greatest aspects of the U.S. Constitution. The judicial branch insures that anyone in America receives a fair trial, that a nobody is incarcerated without due process and significant evidence, it assumes innocents until proven guilt, and protects the rights of citizens, victims, and the accused. The American justice system works most of the time, in that criminals normally go to jail while innocent people are set free; however, every system has its faults. Foremost, there is much debate over the concept of “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Many argue that courts do not always prove guilt or innocence, as in many people who are guilty of their crimes are not convicted because there was not enough evidence. The concept of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ is subjective and left up to the standards of the jurors. In today’s society, if a case does not have physical evidence, but strong circumstantial evidence and eyewitness accounts (evidence that was often deemed enough to convict several decades ago), the jury still may not convict because they have the idea that their should be some type of physical evidence for the person to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Often times, the idea of true guilt is lost in trying to prove ‘beyond a reasonable doubt.’…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays