Preview

Guardians In Plato's Republic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1013 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Guardians In Plato's Republic
Rulers seldom prioritize conditions which benefit those who are subservient to them, as personal advantage is a consistent ambition for those in power. In Plato’s Republic, when conversation leads to the description of an ideal city, Thrasymachus’ belief that rulers rule for their own advantage plays a key role in Socrates’ explanation of how to strategically educate an elite class of guardians whose virtue will be in governance and supervision of society. Education of the mind, body, and soul is what encourages the guardians to be just sovereigns for the ruled. Strict ideals placed on objective censorship of classic literature will guide their intellect, severe training in the arts of gymnastics allows for physical competence, and a lack of monetary influence maintains a just soul; these are all facets to create an ideal ruling class who are compassionate to subjects but ferocious to adversaries (375a). In Childhood, guardians would be bred to rule …show more content…
While according to Socrates music and gymnastics appear to be the only two components in education, it is clear that both of these are only two of three parts for the sake of the soul. The soul of the natural man has irrational desires (epithumetikon) which is why in an ideal society those that rule would not have materialistic ambitions. The guardians would live in modesty and not own private property, they would be rich in education and protect against both wealth and poverty (416/425). To keep riches away from the guardians is beneficial to the ruled because they will be “champions of war” not “fat rich men” therefore they would not only be a stronger force at protecting the people, but it will make the city stronger than that which could separate the unity of brother such as pleasures, desire, and pain

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The the men come up with the most important question who will make the laws and rule the city. Socrates says the guardians will rule. With this ruling they come up with many different attributes that the guardians must…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper argues that Socrates does not successfully refute Thrasymachus’s argument about justice in The Republic. In Book I, Socrates attempts to refute Thrasymachus point about the craftsmen analogy in regards to Thrasymachus’s argument. Socrates argues that every craft seeks the advantage of what it rules over and not its own advantage. (342c) He further goes into this idea of how competition doesn’t exist between people in the same craft.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was an interesting individual, and has always been one of my favorite Philosophers. I personally like most of his political ideals, and find them almost in alignment with my own. In particular I like his reasoning when it comes to the citizens that make up the city-state, along with the leadership. So throughout this essay I plan on drawing from the Republic to talk more about this Philosopher’s ideas.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Republic begins with a debate on the subject of morality. One by one, Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymachus put forth their definitions of morality and one by one, they come up short. None survive the merciless scrutiny of the author’s mentor, Socrates.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After that outburst from Thrasymachus showing pride of himself I asked Socrates what was all that about. He tells me that first I have to know who is Thrasymachus, and how he is portrayed in “The Republic” written by Plato. He is portrayed as a sophist and cynic who argues that people are selfish. By this argument that Thrasymachus yelled to us that “justice is in the interest of the strong and the subjects obeying the interest of the strong” he claims that whoever is at the top of the hierarchy is ultimately the one who has the most power, and that the ruler comes up with this rules on a self-interest base. He claims that justice is mostly the interest of the strong, and those who have more authoritarian power are those who rule the justice system and the system in general. As he states “in all states alike “right” has the same meaning, namely what is for the interest of the party established in power, and that is the strongest” (Thrasymachus, 13). Ultimately, each leader makes…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How is it that Thrasymachus can be so eager to speak against justice, claiming that justice is for fools since the just life ultimately does not pay off compared to the unjust life, which is full of exploitation and oppression of the weak; But from his original argument, Thrasymachus describes justice as the advantage of the stronger party. This inconsistency reveals that even though Thrasymachus himself denies this in his speech, he himself does have an understanding of the common good that is shared in society of some underlying values or ideas of what justice is. Therefore, I as the reader, become to realize that even though Thrasymachus might portray himself as a wise and eloquent speaker, he is not as wise as he believes. From this inconsistency, Thrasymachus appears to be more concerned with the articulation in his rhetoric and the defeat of Socrates, than actually contributing to the discussion and actually finding the true meaning of…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For centuries, every ruler created their own principles and rules and somehow they ruled millions of people and controlled their future. In this essay, I will try to compare the characteristics of two types of ruler, one is Plato’s true guardian where he mentions in the Republic and the other one, Niccoló Machiavelli’s ruler image in his writings The Prince and state my view whether a true guardian or a harsh ruler is suitable for the mankind.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question 2) In Book I of Republic, Thrasymachos’s states that unjust people are stronger and more powerful than just people. Thrasymachos believes that being just is not virtuous nor wise but that men act just only because they afraid of having injustices happening to them so they obey. Those who have power and control are those people who act unjust-they make laws and rules that benefit themselves, not the rest of the people. Socrates proves Thrasymachos otherwise by arguing that being just is virtuous, wise and profitable and being unjust does not make people stronger nor more powerful. Those in power or rulers make laws that are just for themselves but Thrasymachos agrees that sometimes rulers make mistakes and make laws that are unjust to them, therefore, making them just or advantageous for the people they rule. Therefore, unjust people would not be more powerful in this case. Additionally, Socrates goes on to reason with Thrasymachos that the individual in power commands advantages for his or her subject rather than their own personal advantage. Socrates makes a comparison to a doctor and a patient as well as a pilot and a sailor, where the doctor and pilot are commanding advantages for their subjects, the patient and sailor respectively. Thrasymachos argues that a just man will pay taxes on his estate and an unjust man will pay less taxes on the same size property, etc. Therefore, being unjust serves a greater purpose than being just. Socrates goes on to argue that no one chooses willingly to rule but they do so in exchange for wages because the ruler does not expect to make other gains in simply doing what is advantageous for the people being ruled. Work performed by people in power and in control is considered an art form that without being rewarded with wages solely serves that subject, or weaker person, receiving the benefit of the art. For example, a doctor practices the art of making others healthy. There are no advantages the doctor gains in…

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within every individual is the ability to have emotions, the will to make actions, and to have desires, which make up the three distinctive parts of the soul. In opposition Plato states if the guardians are using living a private life there would be more likely to become materialistic and selfish and unable to satisfy their desire. In addition to the guardians having a gold soul where they have a natural ability to govern they would be fully educated, it would be expected that they know how to make just and rational decision. Since they are not money goers or excessively desire and no satisfaction, the guardians will only focus on the citizens and less of themselves because the good of their brothers and sisters is more important that their…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The characterisitics of the ideal guardian is summarized in those words by Socrates in the second book of the Republic : “[H]e who is to be a really good and noble guardian of the State will require to unite in himself philosophy and spirit and swiftness and strength. . .” Swiftness and strength is deemed necessary as the guardian is to be like a well-bred watchdog, who ought to be “quick to see, and swift to overtake the enemy when they see him, and strong too, if when they have caught him, they have to fight with him.” The requirement of ‘spirit’ is then derived from this, because if he is to fight well he ought to be brave, and Socrates finds that he is not likely to be brave who has not spirit, and that “the presence of it makes the soul of any creature to be absolutely fearless.” Finally, it is also found that the guardian must be a philosopher, or a lover of wisdom. With only strength and spirit, the guardians, Socrates says, will likely be savage against each other, which is certainly undesirable. The guardians ought to be dangerous only to their enemies, but gentle to their friends. Therefore, he must have that quality which enables him to “distinguish the face of a friend and of an enemy only by the criterion of knowing and not knowing.” This quality, Socrates says, is love for learning or wisdom, or philosophy. These characteristics are developed and nurtured by education. Socrates prescribes musical education for the soul, and gymnastics for the body.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Gaurdian Class

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The state must be governed by reason (philosophers) and they should have complete control over the states affairs because to much liberty in appetitive people allows for self corruption without reason. From the ages 8-18 the chosen children for guardian education undergo general primary education, followed by two years of physical training. Ten years of training in mathematics then follows and if successfully completed there is 5 years dialectic training. After all of this has been completed the philosopher will serve 15 years apprentice in managing polis leaving the end product at age 55 the best at everything. This shows that Plato also does not believe that young people are capable of ruling.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pericles On Democracy

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pericles glorifies the “equal justice to all” under the law that all men of Athens share and glorifies their superiority over their peer poleis. It is clear that Pericles views democracy as the best form of government and having adopted it, he views Athens as superior to their fellow city states. In fact, Pericles sees Athens as having the ultimate possible government; the one most conducive to freedom, liberty, courage, honor, and justice – values honored by the Athenians. Pericles extolls several of the virtues of Athens, most of them centered on the then-unique form of democracy, depicting that Athens’ administration “favors the many instead of the few; this is why it is called a democracy.” Although Athenians recognize that they live in and participate in a democratic government system, Pericles’ reminder serves to enhance the uniqueness of Athens and provide reasons as to why Athenians should be motivated and inspired to defend their city-state as they honor the fallen in the…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greek Education

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Athens the popular viewpoint of the time was that the state and its government were set up to benefit the individual citizen. The training of boys, both physical and mental, should be for citizenship and for living, not just for warfare. Such education involved the cultivation of the mind even more than the body, and had as its goals the attainment of character, taste, and, above all, sophrosyne, or patience, moderation, and good behavior in word, thought, and daily actions.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays