Preview

Great Chain of Being

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1109 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Great Chain of Being
Great Chain of Being Paper
By: Brian Zwolinski The Great Chain of Being is the concept that the order of the entire universe is under a very strict hierarchical system. The chain goes from god which represents perfection to the bottom level which are the minerals of the earth. Perhaps the most important thing to understand about this chain was that it was impossible for one to move from one level to the next. Wherever you stood in this chain is where you stood for the rest of your life. The way that each object is ranked in this chain was based on relative importance. For example, minerals are on the bottom of the chain because they solely exist. They are not living and cannot move. The next rank up would be that of plants. Plants possess both life and existence. Next would be beast, which is living, has the ability to move, and also possess appetite. Man is a special instance in this conception. He is both mortal flesh, and also spirit. In this paradox, the struggle between flesh and spirit becomes a moral one. The way of the spirit is higher, it brings one closer to God. The desires of the flesh drag one down. The Christian fall of the devil is especially terrible, because that angel is wholly spirit, who yet defies God, the ultimate perfection. The Great Chain of Being was a concept that was used very prominently during the 1500's in France. During this time, absolutism was the main form of government. Absolutism was the idea that all sovereign power belongs to one king. The reason they King thinks he has this power is due to the ideas of divine right and the great chain of being. By using this idea, the King had complete authority over everyone and if anyone went against him he could state that this is similar to going against God himself. The king believed that he was the supreme ruler and he used this power to rule accordingly. Jean Domat's writing "Social Order and Absolute Monarchy" describes in detail what is expected of a ruler and what is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    An absolute monarch has both positive and negative affects as a system or government. One positive attribute is organization. In document eight, Louis the 14th describes the necessity of organization when ruling a country. Without organization, a kingdom is vulnerable and its fall is imamate. With one absolute ruler, nothing is discussed nor fought over. As Louis 14th described, “The interest of the state…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To make a long story short, Louis XIV tried to have power over everything and everyone possible, including the clergy. Absolutism became a well-known term during this period and basically was a political theory that sought to ? encourage rulers to claim complete sovereignty within their territories.? As an absolute monarch you could ?make laws,…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Louis XIV was one of France’s most effective and powerful monarchs. He strengthened his rule with a policy of absolutism. Where the king gained authority directly from God or the divine right to rule. There were no legal limits to the powers that the king could exercise, however, during his rule a monarch had certain influential groups of people who the king needed to negotiate and consult in order to establish an effective functioning government. Among these groups where the land owning nobility, royal officer nobles, the royal commissioners, the Catholic Church, the bourgeoisie and the peasants. More notably seen the King Louis XIV is regarded as the “sun king” because of the great grandeur he exemplified during his reign. The book, Louis XIV and Absolutism by William Beik, presents a balanced outlook into the first half of Louis’ rule in France and how he was able to use absolutism to solidify his reign.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An Absolute Monarchy was a new concept to the people of France during the 1600’s. Other forms of government were failing from lack of control, so the people of France turned to an Absolute Monarch, named Louis XIV. The only problem with Louis was that he was self-centered, and did not care a whole lot about governing his kingdom. He was more concerned with making himself looking good, and even went as far to call himself the “Sun God.” As a result, the French common people lived very rough lives, due to the neglect of their king. It was not an easy life for the French people under King Louis XIV’s rule, and it was not made better by his view on governing. This is shown through his lack of genuine care for his people, over taxation, and wars of the time.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 17th-18th century Europe, the age of absolutism, absolute monarchs ruled most of Europe in countries such as Prussia, France, and the Holy Roman Empire. Absolute monarchs are rulers that have complete control over the government and its people. They claimed to rule by “divine right,” where their authority comes from God and they were above the law. The views of being a proper role as an absolute monarch differed very much between rulers and their subjects. Certain rulers had ideas that both the people and ruler should be united, some abused their power with no sympathy towards the people they rule, and the subjects that suffered from the rulings of the monarch had a completely different perspective than the rulers that were in power.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is an absolute monarchy ? An absolute monarchy is a form of government in which a ruler has absolute , unrestricted power over his people .The absolute monarch of a country is head of state and government , they are not limited by any kind of constitution or law . Absolutism is mostly passed by heredity but there are some few exceptions. During the 1500 and 1600s western europe was pretty much completely ruled by different absolute monarchs .these monarchs could chose the style of their rule , whether they wanted to be a ruler of respect and trust or fear and anguish . the 16th and 17th century in europe proved to be a time of prosperity even through the absolutism ,shown by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan ,Bishop Jacques and the acts…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the more common forms of government was absolutism. Rulers believed they should have complete control over the country. An excerpt in document 1 states that Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be aggressive and feared and thought that the only way the citizen would follow his rule was if he emulated his power and social status. He thought that if he showed kindness and generosity that he would be overthrown. Most of the monarchs believed in divine right, this meant that they thought that they were chosen by God to rule. One of rulers that believed in divine right was King James 1st, his ideas were expressed in document 2 one of his quotes: “….God has the power…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV’s age of Absolutism is evidently shown in the film “The Man In The…

    • 819 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rise Of New Monarchs

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the Crusades, monarchs realized that the key to maintaining power was to gain the support of the nobility and become independent of the nobles. Leaders of New Monarchs changes how they ruled and how they saw themselves as rulers. They cared for the aspirations of the people and represented their country. Louis XI of France and Henry VII of England were two examples of New Monarchs who centralized government and contributed to the rise of their countries from the period of 1450-1550.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An absolute monarch is a king or queen that believes that all of the power rest in their hands and that only answers to God. Monarchs wanted to build huge armies but didn’t have the money so they raised taxes. Peasants revolted because they did not like this. Monarchs increased the army and seized even more control.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    magnesuim

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism was considered the most effective government during the time by giving the rulers unlimited power. Machiavelli, who wrote The Prince, felt that the best way to rule was to be feared by the people. He stated, “Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it” (Document 1). In this quote, it explains how if you were a ruler that was feared, you would receive more respect from the people then if you were loved. King James I also believed that absolutism was the most effective way to rule. In his opinion, kings were Gods and he strongly supported the Divine Right. Divine Right is the belief that kings get their authority from God. "The state of monarchy is the most supreme thing upon earth; for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods" (Document 2). This quote explains how King James I believed he gained his authority from God and if you were chosen to rule, then you must be treated as if you were a god.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Absolutism

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a rule using suppression, backed up by the claim to divine authority, an absolute monarchy embodies the omnipotent government reign. Such power was given solely to the head of the state without any constituted restraints. During the Reformation up to the seventeenth century, Europe’s social system started to have conflict as to whether absolute power should be appointed to the king. The king’s subjects, mostly nobles, supported their kings right to absolute power because they got the benefit of political leadership roles and were also given royal protection. The common-folk and the servants were against it because absolutism abused the power in ruling over the peasants as the king, which tended to be restricting.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Divine Right of Kings

    • 715 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Divine Right of kings: What is it? The divine right of kings is the belief that monarchs or rulers received their rights to rule directly from God, so that all of their actions and decisions were supposedly derived straight from God. The wishes of God were uppermost; the consent and wishes of the people and subjects was rarely ever taken into consideration. A monarch was a direct representative of God. It was believed that a king had to have godly virtues in order to rule properly.…

    • 715 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Age Of Enlightenment

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gradually, complaints in the salons and coffee shops changed from idle whining into constructive political thought. They began to discuss substantive political and social philosophies of the day, and before long the French Enlightenment was born. From here, many highly influential political thinkers emerged during the Enlightenment. One of those was Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède and de Montesquieu. He was a political philosopher famous for his articulation of the theory of separation of powers, which is implemented in many constitutions around the world. Through his education and travels he became a sharp social commentator and thinker who gained the respect of his fellow philosophers with his masterwork The Spirit of Laws, which went on to have a major influence on English and American government. It was also during this time that the philosophes were denouncing Christianity with their nontraditional ways of thinking. They attacked the Church’s traditional idea of the “chain of being,” which implied a natural hierarchy of existence, and believed in a universe that was set in autonomous motion and never tampered with again. The philosophes also raised objections against the decadent lifestyles of leading Church representatives, as well as the Church’s persistence in…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays