Preview

Gottfried Leibniz's Theodicy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1201 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gottfried Leibniz's Theodicy
In 1710 German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz coined the phrase theodicy in his work titled Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil. The meaning of theodicy in its most common form, attempts to answer the question why a good God permits the manifestation of evil. Based on the issues that we face today in the world, it is fair to say that Gottfried Leibniz was far ahead of his time in his philosophy. More than I have ever experienced in my lifetime people are questioning the existence of God. Many atrocities and foul deeds occur in the world that we previously would not have been so easily exposed to. Through technological advances in communication, we are able to view the news and information from …show more content…
The experience of being able to look into the madness of the world unfiltered causes many people to believe that we are in the last days and times. I do not believe that this is true. The evils of this world have always been there, we just have easier access to them. I believe that this is an age of enlightenment that will eventually bring people closer to God. William Lane Craig is a Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology and Professor of Philosophy at Houston Baptist University. According to an article that he authored on his website (Craig, n.d.), the problem of evil is certainly the greatest obstacle to belief in the existence of God. The problem of evil is the basis of the concept of theodicy. Mr. Craig does an excellent job of illustrating the general frustrations of the people of the world today in regards to the existence of God. With the extent and depth of suffering in the world, whether due to man’s inhumanity to man or to natural disasters, how can a person continue to believe in the existence of God? The article is written by someone that truly believes in the existence of God. What I really respect about the article is that Mr. Craig has no problem examining the problem of evil from both …show more content…
According Vexen, the Christian Bible denies free will and any element of choice in what good works we do. God has picked who will do what good deeds, and God also punishes and rewards people on account of what God has chosen, in accordance with God's plan and purpose. Although I do not fully agree with this ideology I can understand the logic used to make someone come to this conclusion. The truth is that no person will ever be able to fully comprehend the will of God, and many have views that dramatically conflict with each

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Pramiti Sankar PHIL 100 AD0 3 March 2024 Section 1: Introduction In this paper, I will critique William L. Rowe's argument from the problem of evil against the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and wholly good God. Rowe constructs a deductively valid argument that aims to show that the existence of intense suffering in the world provides rational grounds for atheism - the belief that such a theistic God does not exist. While his argument is logically valid, there are ultimately not sufficient grounds to confidently affirm the truth of the first premise because of our inherent human limitations in knowledge, potential ignorance of goods beyond our comprehension, fallibility in evaluating goods versus evils, and the importance of preserving…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Lane Craig argues in Reasonable Faith that, if life ends in a grave, that it does not matter whether someone has been a good or bad person because one’s “destiny” is not related to how a person behaves, thus someone has no motivation to live life as a good person. McCloskey argues that not believing in a God is more comforting when someone you love or yourself is going through a hard time or is suffering from a terrible disease. Rather than believing in a God who is purposely allowing the person to suffer through whatever they are going…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: James Rachels addresses the conflicts of evil in his book “Problems from Philosophy” by providing various forms of logical problems. The author points out the different possible explanations to why evil would exist. The first major idea Rachels makes is that perhaps pain is essential to caution people of danger. He goes on to suggest that this would not account for why some people are born with deadly diseases. Another idea he makes is that evil helps people appreciate the good in life. One would not be able to distinguish the good in life if evil did not exist. However, this does not explain why the world needs so much evil to exist, instead of letting a few bad things happen occasionally. The third idea the author makes questions why bad things happen to good people. Rachels suggests maybe those bad things that occur in life are…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea that God gave humans free will is one that is essential to the Christian faith. This is highlighted in Genesis. If we were to believe this concept consequently, we would believe that we are morally responsible for our actions. The idea of omnipotence logically requires God knowing what we will do before we do it. This is a problem with the idea of free will, as this may mean that we do not entirely have freedom. It could be argued that God has no right to reward and punish if he is able to foresee what will happen. In the Bible there are many passages which demonstrate God rewarding and punishing.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 13 Essay

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As I mentioned before religiously I was told the free will defense although I didn’t know it was a philosophy idea as well. There are many different ideas trying to show that both statements are true: There is an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God. And there is evil (Jensen 312). One explanation is that God is limited (Jensen 312). Another is his ways cannot be scrutinized (Jensen 313). Leibniz proposed that a perfect world is not logically possible (Jensen 314). Tennant said that evils are a necessary by-product of nature (Jensen 314). Another idea is that evil is a way to grow as a person a sort of therapy (Jensen 323). Some like John Stuart Mill proposed “radical surgery” by saying that God is not omnipotent (Jensen 311). Alvin Plantinga defended God from being responsible for evil by saying that for moral good to be present humans must be capable of moral evil as well (Jensen 321). My favorite thought in this chapter is from John Hick and his writings on Irenaeus a Christian theologian. Hick suggests that man was created imperfect and immature creature who needed to go through a moral development and growth before his final stage of perfection that was intended for him by the creator. I love this idea because the Bible makes man a sinner who destroyed his perfection and then plunged into sin and misery for the remainder of his existence (Jensen…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Problem of Evil- Notes

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Antony Flew wrote that the biggest challenge to the believer is accepting that the existence of evil and suffering is a major problem that demands an adequate response. The problem faced by monotheists demands a solution, not of qualification; in which the nature of God is arbitrarily changed to suit different circumstances – this concept of God ‘dies the death of a thousand qualifications,’ but by the rational justification of God’s right to allow evil and suffering to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem with the free will theodicy is that not all theologies are consistent or hold identical positions (Elwell, pg 1184). Elwell also states, that the “free will defense is an inappropriate answer to the problem of moral evil, since the notion of freedom involved in the free will defense is incompatible with the freedom involved in the Calvinistic system (Elwell, pg 1184).” Elwell writes about another theodicy which is the soul building theodicy, this theodicy rests upon a rationalist theology (Elwell, pg 1186) John Hick asks a good question by saying, “What sort of environment would be most conducive to soul-building?” I feel that would be good reason for sin to be present in everyday life, which allows God to show His mercy and grace. Elwell also writes about the fact of having an Edenic paradise would currently take away from a world to win souls to Christ. With Hick’s theology on the subject, Elwell notes that this would not be accepted by some as a whole due to the way it is outlined (Elwell, pg 1186). The intent of a consistent theodicy is to avoid self-contradiction (Elwell, pg 1187). For example, if you write a theodicy explaining evil and try to justify it by…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the Problem of Evil? Is it reasonable to believe a Perfectly Good God, or even a Good God exists if there is suffering in the world?…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Problem of Evil

    • 1445 Words
    • 54 Pages

    The Argument From Evil By Peter Van Inwagen Olga Berdnikova 1000784430 PHL 105 Professor Bernard Katz TA: Andre February 23, 2014 Word Count: 1396 The article “The Argument from Evil” by Peter Van Inwagen analyses the existence of evil within the world and its relation to God.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free will is the concept that humanity has the ability to make their own choices, this suggests that humanity has a moral understanding that is inherent and God given. Some people argue that you are born with this morality and it does not develop. Christians would argue that this morality is god given, and that we merely develop it through our upbringing. If Christians accept the concept of God, then it is necessary that they view God as omniscient, this would suggest he knows everything we have done and everything we will do, thus taking away free will. However, many Christians take the view that god gave us free will after he cast Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. In this way moral responsibility can exist and there can be a differentiation between a person who acts morally and immorally because there is now the option of choice.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What makes Leibniz’ perspective credible is his prestigious accomplishments. Leibniz is the son of a professor of law, and has countless achievements in a wide variety of subjects. These subjects include: law, science, theology, calculus, etc. He takes his work and philosophies seriously. In the topic of “God Can Allow Evil”, Leibniz defends God and his decision to allow evil. He justifies God in response to many common questions.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Response Paper

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The existence of God has been a huge issue for many, many centuries. In H. J. McCloskey's article "On being an Atheist" he said that the cosmological and teleological arguments are false and that we need to forget the idea of God completely because there is no definitive proof. McCloskey's main issue with the idea of God is the presence of evil in the world. ca…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays