Genetically modified food should be banned
As newer and newer technologies are coming upfront more and more risks factors are added in the human health. Not only do they damage the human body but also it affects plants and living organisms who are consuming it. Today there is not much difference found in neither consuming healthy food like fruits, vegetables nor eating french fries, burger because the more processed food the more genetically modified? According to the author Smith “Americans eat genetically modified foods everyday. When compared to European countries their strict policy avoids them to use these foods” (23-25). According to the government approved website WHO defines genetically modified foods as the “food in which genetic information from one organism, and inserting or modifying it into another organism”. The main reason for this technique proved that crops stay fresher, grow bigger, and have the crops create their own pesticides. However the debate is still going on whether GMF are safe or not. The author Qaim in his article says “GM food helps in the production of highest food and food security among the developing countries” (552). As the genes are inserted in a ways that gives highest production with added nutrition and appealing, which makes consumers desirability towards that food. Not only has this, but it also creates benefits to the manufacturing company’s who sell them as they can raise there price accordingly. Genetically modified food should be strictly banned as it also adds to various negative effects on human health and need to be removed from everyday agriculture because of the risks they create to human health.
Genetically modified foods are found to produce toxic substances. According to the author Dona “Animal toxicity studies with certain GM foods have shown that they may toxically affect several organs and systems” (164-165). However, this particular gene in the GM soybean also produced an allergen (a substance that causes allergic reactions in people). Fortunately, the plant was not put into production” According to the author Mchughen “how GM tomato called “FLAVR SAVR” caused toxicity among the population. These tomatoes are found bigger tastier and stays fresher longer than commercial tomatoes on the market. Combining conventional tomato genes with the genes of an arctic trout produces the “FLAVR SAVR”. Nevertheless, questions such as “Will people with sea food allergies be able to consume the tomato?” and “Will the trout genes in the tomato enable new bacteria growth, and thereby make the tomato hazardous to eat?” have still not been answered. This causes the “FLAVR SAVR” to be a potential hazard to human health” (14). Technology plays an important role in whether it having a negative impact or positive impact in the human body. Consumers cannot justify it whether it is that tomatoes have a negative impact on the body or not. It can only be known by consuming it because consumers are not aware about the production of that food. Unless and until one consumed one cannot know how it may affects the system because it depends on how the genes in the tomatoes play role.
According to the author Bakshi it is also found that “GM food does not have any nutritional impact on health” (217-219). Example of Cow’s milk, when cows are injected with gamma bovine growth hormone (rBGH) contains higher levels of fat and bacteria, and this make the milk spoil faster. “According to the author Nottingham this injection helps in yielding in high production of milk. On the other side they can spoil faster. The new protein in food which is formed by combining alters the cellular metabolism of the organism that is produced in involuntary and unaware manner. And so this organism does not make an important or vital nutrient in the body. So it can be said that GM food lacks in nutrition” (Nottingham 28). On the other side Food and Drug Administration claims that GM foods add to the nutritional values...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document