Preview

Gm Stock Repurchase Recommendation

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
393 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gm Stock Repurchase Recommendation
GMRe: GM stock recommendation
After reading Jeff Bennett and Sharon Terlep’s recent article, “U.S. Balks at GM Plan” in the 17 September, 2012 issue of the Wall Street Journal, I would like to make recommendation on when it would be best to allow GM to buy back 200 million shares from Treasury.
In order to make this decision, I suggest analyzing from two aspects. One is the political influence. When should Treasury accept the buyback offer, so that can benefit the Obama administration? The other is the return on GM investment. When will GM’s stock price go up to the level that can pay back Treasury’s bailout?
For the political influence, an execution that can boost the confidence in current administration should be preferred. Obama administration has maintained that the bailout of auto industry has saved jobs and was a “win-win for business and taxpayer alike.” If the stock is bought back at current price, $24.14, which is much lower than the breakeven price $53, the huge loss would be a big stroke on the government. It is definitely not a good idea to sell the taxpayer’s investment in GM at a loss before election, especially given the criticism of Republican nominee. As the government has already made a profit from investment in banks, a good strategy would be to wait till “emergency fund” make more profit that can offset loss on GM.
From the return on the stock perspective, GM’s prospects are “murky”. The company has been losing money in Europe. The slowly recovering U.S. auto industry is another concern. Moreover, there is “ouster of some key executives” in the company, creating uncertainty. On the other hand, the company is in “solid financial shape” and has generating profit for 10 straight quarters. GM also rolled out plan to “eliminate risk” and freshen lineup. So GM will not expect huge revenue in the near future, but will not bear too much downside risk as well. The company’s stock price would be smooth and the bailout would probably turn out to lose

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government bailout of General Motors (GM) and Chrysler between 2008 and 2009 coasted taxpayers approximately $23 billion. President Barack Obama emphatically defends his decision to subsidize the automakers, arguing it was necessary to prevent massive job losses. Even if one accepts this premise, the government should and could have executed the bailout more efficiently, with no cost to taxpayers, had the Administration required the United Auto Workers (UAW) to accept standard bankruptcy concessions. Instead, the Obama Administration gave special treatment to the UAW above and beyond what other creditors and unions received:…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Auto Bailout

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Obama administration had to make the call: Bail the automakers out? Or let them go bankrupt without the bailout?…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eco 550

    • 2765 Words
    • 12 Pages

    For this assignment, General Motors is the automobile company that will be reviewed and researched in detail. In the year 1908 William Durant, who was already known as a leader in this industry for horse drawn vehicles, founded General Motors. "At its inception GM held only the Buick Motor Company, but in a matter of years would acquire more than 20 companies including Oldsmobile, Cadillac, and Oakland, today known as Pontiac" (General Motors, 2012). In this paper GM 's income statement will be reviewed to figure out the following calculations: the number of cars sold each quarter, the elasticities, marginal cost, variable cost, and fixed costs. After figuring out these calculations, there will be a clear answer to what the future options are for General Motors if they decide to expand.…

    • 2765 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Accounting: Quick Fix

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: The CPA in Industry: Corporate Share Buybacks. (2007). The CPA Journal. Retrieved on Dec 12, 2009 from http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=58545.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Organizational Change

    • 2582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 2009, General Motors received a “bailout” from the United States government because it promised that there would be a substantial change within the company. The organizational changes that General Motors brought about were corporate downsizing. There was drastic restructuring within General Motors so that it became less bureaucratic. In fact, several layers of management were removed. These decisions saved money and improved the speed of decision making. Further, General Motors’ culture was changed to one of building cars that directly satisfied the needs of customers. Already, there have been positive effects within the company. It had incurred a net loss of $30.9 billion in 2008.…

    • 2582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gm Financial Ratios

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From the analysis above, it shows that the two companies have different strengths. Ford has the higher liquidity ratio while GM has the higher profitability ratio. Well for me, both the two companies have credibility throughout the years. But the main purpose for investing is to earn. That’s why, I think GM is better investment…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hertz Case

    • 3039 Words
    • 13 Pages

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In April 2005, Ford announced its intention to investigate possible strategic alternatives for Hertz. At the same time, Ford’s stock price went down significantly. This negative reaction from the market shows Ford’s lack of confidence in its future operation, since Hertz is one of the strongest subsidiaries and revenue sources for Ford. Even though Ford would lose significant value of itself in this transaction, the slump in Ford’s main business especially in North American segment and a possible downgrade of its bond rating forced them to conduct drastic financing strategy to recover itself. The company had two alternatives to rid of Hertz: selling to a private bidding group via LBO transaction and listing on public stock exchange market. Their priority was to acquire the immediate cash through this transaction of Hertz. Our analysis of the LBO offer proposed by Bidding Group yields an expected return of 21.2%, and expected return by the public market to equal 24%. FORD’S MOTIVATION In 2005, Ford is valuing possibilities of selling its 100% subsidiary of Hertz in the most financially favorable manner. During Jacques Nasser’s presidency, Ford lost its financial stamina. Nasser successfully finalized many deals including Volvo, Land Rover and Hertz, yet this aggressive business expansion and buyout gave Ford a very vulnerable position. As the Ford’s need for cash increase, it began considering the strategic alternatives of selling Hertz privately to private investors and going to a public offering. This dual truck process can increase the bargaining power for Ford in the bidding for Hertz. FORD’S DUAL-TRACK PROCESS (1) During Jacques Nasser’s presidency, Ford’s cash reserve was quite low and they were looking to unload Hertz in the most financially feasible way. By putting Hertz on the market to privately held bidding groups like Carlyle’s and not just releasing an IPO, Ford created a more flexible and…

    • 3039 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rim Executive Summary

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

     For i nvestors , it is the perfect time to invest in RIMM shares, either the company stand high again or it…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Horton, B. (2010). The TARP bailout of gm: A legal, historical, and literary critique. Texas Review of…

    • 3094 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Effects of government bailout of General Motors as viewed by two contrasting government control views”…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Government Duty

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages

    government. The corporation bought back the 14.4 million stock warrantsA security entitling the holder to buy a proportionate amount of stock at some specified future date at a specified price, usually one higher than current market. This "warrant" is then traded as a security, the price of which reflects the value of the underlying stock. Warrants are usually issued as a "sweetener" bundled with another class of security to enhance the marketability of the latter. Warrants are like call options, but with much longer time spans -- sometimes years. (Washington Post) given to the government in exchange for the loan guarantee. Because Chrysler's finances had improved and its stock had bounced back it reported $1.7 billion in profits for the second quarter of 1984 the government netted a profit of more than $660 million from its bailout…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    GM faced a financial crisis in 1990 due to overcapacities, rising oil prices and increasing…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the market uses the premium, the target fraction and the fraction of insider holdings as signals…

    • 3287 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Buy Back of Shares

    • 5511 Words
    • 23 Pages

    The SEBI Regulations, 1998 prescribed specific practical requirements and procedures applicable to listed companies going for buy-back of shares/securities.…

    • 5511 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Companies often buy back their own shares. There are several reasons to take such step that is to increase earnings per share, return on equity, to avoid takeover attempts, or to reduce the number of shareholders and so on. Some publicly held corporations purchase all their outstanding shares with the procedure of leverage buyout (LBO) and choose to go private. Recently, this LBO procedure is adopted by dell with the help of Microsoft contribution of 2 billion dollars. In the article “Microsoft Takes A Side in PC Wars,” Ovide and Das, discuss the deal between dell and Microsoft that provided Microsoft, with “the choice: either taking 2 billion more in high yield debt or bringing in Microsoft as a ‘passive debt investor’ who would emotionally and financially committed to Dell’s future.” Microsoft agreed to provide a loan to dell so they can free their company from the pressure of the shareholders and run the company with their terms and strategy. Aristotle once said, “Wealth does not lie in ownership but in the use of things”. Clearly, Microsoft has interpreted Aristotle for their long-term benefit. Their decision to turn down the ownership option of dell over the contribution of 2 billion dollar loan to dell is an intelligent move from the Microsoft perspective. Microsoft, a cash cow, who is standing on the pile of $68.3 billion in cash and its short-term securities itself, generates about $2 billion in cash every month; thus, this loan is not high risk for Microsoft. Currently, Microsoft has no control over dell operations but in the long run it can gain a lot of benefits from this small amount of contribution. In the future, if Dell carries out its operations successfully and substantially increases its value, Microsoft will have an incentive to convert its debt to equity and get its chunk of Dell’s profits. On the other hand, if Dell’s profits deteriorate, then, keeping its debt as is, Microsoft will be receiving its…

    • 2577 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays