Preview

Gifts & Bribes

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1252 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gifts & Bribes
Introduction
The conducting of business in a multi-national environment calls that extra factors are considered. This is the case where cultural practices pertaining to gifts, bribes, and any other kind of payments have become part of accepted business norms. In the United States, through the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977, “companies cannot make payments of this nature while knowing or having reason to know that any portion of the funds will be transferred to a forbidden recipient to be used for corrupt purposes” (Fadiman, 1986). This paper aims to discuss, briefly, why bribery might become a problem for U.S. managers working in foreign countries; the major features of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA); why the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act may create a competitive disadvantage for U.S. firms; and three non-Western traditions that can lead to confusion regarding “gifts” versus “bribes.” Finally, this paper will offer some suggestions for managers who want to give bribes without violating the FCPA in the U.S.
U.S. Companies Abroad and the FCPA
In 1977, the U.S. Congress passed what is known as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA or simply “the Act” in this paper) to help U.S. companies understand what bribery is, and what is considered acceptable or not acceptable behavior both domestically and internationally. It may be easy for U.S. managers when dealing locally, but not so much when in foreign countries. This is because in other countries, it is sometimes hard to tell what a bribe is and what is not; since what may be considered a bribe from a U.S. perspective may not be seen as such in other places (Fadiman, 1986). Under the 1977 Act, not all payments can be considered bribes. For instance, the Act states that some payments are acceptable if they do not violate the local laws of the place where the transaction is taking place. In the same vein, bribes given to influence political decisions are not allowed, while those that are given



Cited: Fadiman, J. A. (1986). A Traveler 's Guide to Gifts and Bribes. Havard Business Review. Justice, D. o. (2012, August 31). Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Retrieved September 2, 2012, from Department of Justice: http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is one legal issue contained in the ethics case regarding the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The FCPA makes it unlawful for individuals and businesses to make payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA deems these payments as bribes, which are not subject to a materiality amount. Grease payments under the FPCA are permitted as long as they are made to foreign officials in order to expedite their performance of routine duties in which they are required to…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    influence of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act will also be discussed. The paper will be…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Acc 557

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    U.S., China and Jamaica have different economic and cultural background, so their business decisions are influenced by different ethical standards. China is transforming from the socialist economy from capitalist economy, so there will be clashes between individualism and collectivism mentality. In the vignette #1 of the case study, managers of the three countries are asked to give their view on bribing foreign businessmen to gain access to his country’s market. Big discrepancy is found in Rationale C (Bribe; unethical), E (Is an acceptable practice in other countries), and F (Is not unethical, just the price paid to do business). 23.5% American respondents, 17.9% Jamaican respondents, and 8.2% Chinese respondents believe it is unethical to do so. 13.6% American respondents, 46.9%…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United Kingdom Bribery Act was passed on 8 April 2010 and became effective on 1 July 2011. Until recently, international anti-corruption enforcement has been largely dominated by the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977. The mainMain difference between the (FCPA) and the (UKBA) is as follows: Both the Bribery Act and the FCPA indicate it is a crime to bribe foreign (public) officials. Under the (UKBA) “foreign public official” isare defined more narrowly than under the FCPA but still include anyone who holds a foreign legislative or judicial position. The FCPA does not cover bribery on a private level, unlike the Bribery Act, although such conduct can be caught under other US legislation. The FCPA only covers active bribery, in contrast, the (UKBA) prohibits both active and passive bribery. The (UKBA) creates a strict liability corporate offence for failure to prevent bribery (as opposed to vicarious liability) subject to being able to establish that a company has “adequate procedures”. Under the FCPA, however, a company subject to US jurisdiction can be held vicariously liable for acts of its employees and agents. The UK offence extends to acts of “associated persons” which means anyone who performs services for or on behalf of the commercial organization. An individual found to have committed an offence under the (UKBA) is liable to imprisonment of up to ten years and/or to an unlimited fine. A company found guilty is subject to an unlimited fine. For offences committed under the FCPA an individual can be fined up to US$250,000 per violation and may also be given up to five years imprisonment. A company guilty under the FCPA is liable for…

    • 767 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Department of Justice

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There seems to be relevant laws and regulations such as Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Travel Act. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act made it unlawful to bribe officials. It was passed in 1977.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States foreign corrupt practices act is the law that makes foreign bribery illegal. Terms from the act are defined to further understand the extent of the act and how it was created and why. Provision covered within the act are also explained to further understand how this act can convict multiple officials and companies committing corrupt acts of bribery with foreign officials.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government enacted the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 to assist with the unethical, and political options that were available in foreign countries that are not considered in the United States. The Act addresses the issue of bribery and mandates it as an illegal business transaction. The Act was a response to over 400 companies admitting to questionable payments being made to foreign officials to obtain or sustain business in their…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ibus 300 Notes

    • 2891 Words
    • 12 Pages

    * Foreign Corrupt Practices Act- US law regulating behavior regarding the conduct of international business in the taking of bribes and other unethical actions (Lockheed airplane manufacturing case)…

    • 2891 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many companies are trying to expand economically in the market by doing business with an individual or another company in foreign countries. These businesses are engaging in into using improper ways of payments that are leading to secret bribes to the foreign public officials. Foreign countries are not always in compliance with the laws and they tend not to follow them. Having these problems with the US and all the millions of dollars that have been passed they wanted to take a more affirmative approach and be able to correct the problem. That is when congress decided to introduce the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to prosecute foreign companies for corrupt payments within the United States. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is a federal law that was amended in 1977. This law “prohibits the United States from bribing foreign officials to secure advantageous contracts”(1). A foreign official is defined as any officer or employee of the foreign government or any department, agency, public international organization, or any person acting in an official for or behalf any such government or department, agency, or public international organization (2). The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was implemented for companies from the United States that are managing business in foreign countries to do so without any unethical business practices (3). This federal law consists of two provisions, the anti-bribery and the accounting/book and record provision. The first provision consists of the anti-bribery provision in which contracts with enforcing the Department of Justice. The DOJ is one of the enforcements for Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in which prosecutes the issuers and their officers, employees, agents, and domestic concern all in which are acting in the US (4). The anti-bribery of FCPA prohibits anything that deals with payments or an authorization of any payment that obtains or retains with business. There are three types of improper violations for the anti-bribery…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was design to make it fair for companies in the United States to be able to compete in the global market. It was amended in 1977, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. ("FCPA"), and it “prohibits United States businesspersons from bribing foreign officials to secure advantageous contracts” (Business Law Text & Exercises, p.22). This law makes it illegal to engage in any form of bribery, whether monetary or of any kind, in order to get an edge in another country. This law applies to all US companies including officials, directors, officers, shareholders, employees and agents. In the past, many companies in the US and the world would engage in bribery in order to get ahead in business procedures. Whether it be a license or creating a loop hole in local laws, the bribery of foreign government officials is something that was a common practice in the past and its is still going on, even with laws being implemented.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    misuse of bribery

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (xiii) Jeffrey Fadiman, “A Traveller’s Guide to Gifts and Bribes” (1986) Harvard Business Review 3-12.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thus, in the US, it is not either legal or ethical to take part in corrupt international business transactions but it may be…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Romach Case

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    International Medical Laboratories was very specific about their loyalty to the “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” that Congress had just passed after a scandal in Japan. IML, which provides lifesaving medical equipment, meant that the company should represent themselves as a leader and be trust worthy. Any unethical behavior, like a bribe would look bad to the public. In fact the company included in their corporate mission the statement “The Company does not engage in any sort of activity which me be construed as unethical.”…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Bribes to government officials, side payments, facilitation payments, donations to political parties before elections….when is corruption MORALLY corrupt? Analyze critically the meaning of corruption in an international business setting and assess its economic and moral impact.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A federal law enacted in 1977 which prohibits companies from paying bribes to foreign government officials and political figures for the purpose of obtaining business. US Department of Justice, The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays