Preview

Gideon V. Wainwright

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1061 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gideon V. Wainwright
Gideon V. Wainwright

Name of teacher: Mr. James Pierce
Name of student:
Course: Criminal Court Systems
Assignment due date: December 16, 2013 January 8, 2014
Gideon V. Wainwright

Since time immemorial, history has always recorded in its annals that man is by nature both a rebellious and dominant creature. Because of these two innate traits, it seems nearly impossible for men to cohabit or coexist without having any channel or medium through which one man does not feel the urge that he can trample on his fellow man at will. Henceforth, the birth of this new term or ideology called civilization. Although civilization has its merit, nevertheless, it did not nor could it completely heal men of this pompous idea of superiority or dominance over his fellow men and women. By itself, this new ideology could easily be compared to a fort guarded by unarmed soldiers. In the military world, such an order for the soldiers guarding this fort to bear no arms would have simply been a suicide mission. To prevent this inevitable forfeit or coward act, should enemies reached the shores and conquer the fort with no retaliation; these same soldiers armed themselves with a gun called law. In spite of the contrasting feelings about the criminal justice system, many people can attest however that it brought forth or produced more possibility for men to lead a more peaceful and stable life amongst his peers using law as their compass. On the other end of the spectrum, some people like Clarence Earl will argue that the criminal justice system, in their opinion, did not pave the way to a more peaceful and stable journey for him, as he never seemed to have reaped nor tasted the good fruits, emanating from the criminal justice system tree. The right to a fair trial, the right to due process, and the right to have counsel present when being interrogated were some of those legal fruits guaranteed in the constitution that were taken away Mr. Gideon when he was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defendant Clarence Earl Gideon was charged with breaken and entering a poolroom with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Defendant was denied request for appointed counsel on the grounds that under the laws of Florida only a defendant charged with a capital offense was entitled to such an appointment. Defendant was without funds. Defendant conducted his own defense. Defendant was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment of five years in the state prison. Defendant filed in the Supreme Court of Florida the present habeas corpus petition, attacking his conviction on the ground that his federal constitutional rights were violated by the trial court's refusal to appoint counsel. The appeal was denied by the Florida Supreme…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case Gideon V Wainwright all started when Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested for possibly stealing pocket change, bottles of coke, beer, and wine. When Gideon went to trial Gideon believed that an attorney should be appointed to him under the 6th amendment the right to counsel ;however, the state of Florida decided that was for federal cases only. After Gideon lost his trial against the state of Florida Gideon found a way to take it further and appealed to the Supreme Court. Once Gideon appealed the supreme court took it from there mainly Hugo Black a justice that firmly believes that everyone deserves an attorney according to the 6th and 14th amendments in which he lost earlier in his career betts v. brady. Once the case was finished being…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rev. Billy Graham’s grandson Tullian Tchividjian has resurfaced from an adultery scandal with a new wife and a preaching on God’s redemption.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clarence Earl Gideon was a man that was wrongfully convicted of a crime. Clarence had a bad background prior to the trial. His record prior was that he had felonies, and he was in jail for four times already, and he ran away from home, and was found with some stolen clothes on. His background didn’t make it easy for him to be found guilty. Gideon was accused of stealing wine, beer, money, and Coca Cola from the pool room. The charges that were brought to him was Petty theft. The evidence the state used against him was that he was seen by a witness breaking into the pool room. The sentencing that Gideon got was 5 years in a working prison. Gideon’s first trial was not in his favor, because he did not have a lawyer defending him, and he didn’t…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), is a landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution to provide lawyers in criminal cases for defendants unable to afford their own attorneys.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we continue through Gideon’s Trumpet, Anthony Lewis continues to explain the complicated process that the Supreme Court takes in hearing a case. There are many instances in which Lewis shows how he is in favor of thick, procedural democracy. Lewis emphasizes the process of judicial review; the prejudice is the court system, the history of ones right to counsel, and how the court was changing at the time. Through these examples, Lewis shows how the Supreme Court is not a perfectly unbiased system; it is quite adequate in its process. However, as this book relates to American Creation, the time and place of the novel played a pivotal role in fate of Clarence Earl Gideon. Throughout this section of Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis shows that the case of Gideon v. Cochran and later Gideon v. Wainwright was not as important as the time at which the case occurred.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the groundbreaking case Gideon vs. Wainwright we are given a prime example of a Supreme Court case and its impact on federalism. Gideon was accused of felony burglary charges after an eyewitness placed him at the scene of a robbery. Although there was no evidence of him committing the crime, police arrested him and charged him with the theft based solely on an eye witness report. The sequences of events that would follow would change the way states were ordered to provide due process and create a fair and balanced trial for all felony trials.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Have you ever got yourself into a really bad situation where you needed professional help? Some people get into a little bit of trouble where they need the legal help. There are many cases that went through the court systems that we don’t really even hear about because they're so small. These cases are the ones that don’t really matter. The cases that are bigger are the ones that people hear more about usually the little cases get pushed to the side and slid around to the back of the court cases and people normally never hear about those cases. Like the case in 1963 Gideon's Vs. Wainwright, many people haven’t heard about this case because it was so long ago and it wasn’t that big of a case.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morse V. Frederick

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally as a Supreme Court judge and after taking a fairly through look at the cases, I’d have to rule in favor of Frederick. While the banner that Mr. Frederick had up during the school event does make a reference to drugs, the message is pretty vague as even I can’t really interpret the true absolute definition of the banner. Judge Steven even states “Justice John Paul Stevens took the position that the school 's interest in protecting students from speech that can be reasonably regarded as promoting drug use does not justify Frederick 's punishment for his attempt to make an ambiguous statement simply because it refers to drugs.” ( n/a, 2012). Another important reason why I am following this ruling is because while yes Mr. Frederick had a 14 foot banner held high it didn’t exactly disrupt the school event itself and it was the principals own interpretation of the message that caused a disruption that escalated into Frederick’s unjustified punishment. This statement from the ACLU even states that Fredericks actions were done off school campus, “As the ACLU and Mertz noted, the sign caused no disruption, was displayed at the Olympic Torch Relay - a public event on public streets - and Frederick had not yet arrived at school for the day.” (N/a, 2007 ). Just by this alone I believe that the principal had no justification in asking to take the banner down because of the cryptic message let alone punish Mr. Frederick just because of her own intrepertation.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi History

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout history laws play a major role in the expansion of civilization in which most of these principles and rituals acted as a moral and ethical guide for the way humans could live. When taking a closer look at the foundation for today's laws and justice system historically, society can trace the first origins back to the Babylonian Empire by the great ruler, King Hammurabi around 1800 BC known as the The Code Of Hammurabi. Many are familiar with the old saying “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” but little do most know that very thinking is the set basis just for what Hammurabi was trying to bring to his people such as order and unity by giving protection in equal law for all citizens to follow.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott, an African American man who was born into slavery, wanted what all slaves would have wanted, their freedom. They were mistreated, neglected, and treated not as humans, but as property. In 1852, Dred Scott sued his current owner, Sanford, about him, no longer being a slave, but a free man (Oyez 1). In Article four of the Constitution, it states that any slave, who set foot in a free land, makes them a free man. This controversy led to the ruling of the state courts and in the end, came to the final word of the Supreme Court. Is he a slave or a free man?…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice and the law do not always coincide, as evident in ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’. The legal system and the views of society do not always reflect each other. When society demands the persecution of those ‘guilty’ of punishable crimes and the legal system fails to prevail, justice…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Explain Lex Talionis from the literally and historical point of view—Eye for an eye, e.g. Principle of retaliation was used to keep peace…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evolution of Court System

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States court system has evolved in many ways since its inception. While there are many issues that courts and court administrators face in today 's society, the U.S. court system has improved immensely and can continue to improve in the future. Through the evaluation of the evolution of the United States court system 's handling of victim 's rights during court proceedings, one can better understand how the court system will deal with the future management of issues, as well as other trends that will occur in areas such as language interpretation services. Historically, the United States court system functioned in a manner that is very different from the ways in which it functions today. One of the stark differences between the U.S. court system of yesterday and the U.S. court system of today was its general focus. Though the United States court systems began, during colonial times, to focus their punitive efforts in restoring the losses of victims of crimes, from the 1850 's to the early 1970 's, much of the focus of the United States court systems became creating punishments that scared criminals who committed crimes into becoming upright citizens (Derene, et al, 2007). The United States court systems are based on a mixture of many cultural principles of justice, which influenced how punishments were handed down by the courts (Derene, et al, 2007). Many of the principles of the court system were based on Roman principles, which focused on the administration of public laws, laws that “dealt with the organization and administration of the Republic,” as well as private laws, which “addressed issues such as contracts; possession and other property rights; injuries to citizens; and the legal status of various persons, such as slaves, husbands, and wives (Derene, et al, 2007).” Using these principles along with other principles that were adopted by other companies, United States court systems based many of their judgments on the idea that restitution was…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inchoate Offenses

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe criminal liability and punishment for inchoate offenses is indeed fair. An inchoate offense is “a criminal act that goes beyond mere thought, but occurs before the substantive criminal act is completed” (Wallace & Roberson 2008 p.63). Also called preparatory or incomplete crimes, the acts involve the impulse to commit, or indirect participation in, a criminal offense. It is in society’s best interest to punish crimes that have not been fully carried out. This is so “injuries caused by substantive crimes can be avoided” (Wallace & Roberson 2008 p.64). Public safety and preventing crimes are crucial in protecting innocent people from becoming victims of crime. If a criminal was about to rob a home, and the occupants show up and interrupt him breaking into their house, and the perpetrator drops his bag of burglary tools and runs, the unexpected return of the homeowners stopped his crime from being completed, but the robbers intent was clearly to rob their home, and this was apparent from the burglary tools he left behind when he ran. This person can then be arrest and prosecuted for attempted burglary, even though he never made it in the house to commit the crime of burglary.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays