Preview

Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
277 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study
Gideon v. Wainwright
Facts
Defendant Clarence Earl Gideon was charged with breaken and entering a poolroom with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Defendant was denied request for appointed counsel on the grounds that under the laws of Florida only a defendant charged with a capital offense was entitled to such an appointment. Defendant was without funds. Defendant conducted his own defense. Defendant was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment of five years in the state prison. Defendant filed in the Supreme Court of Florida the present habeas corpus petition, attacking his conviction on the ground that his federal constitutional rights were violated by the trial court's refusal to appoint counsel. The appeal was denied by the Florida Supreme

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: For this situation there were eight litigants who were detained in the province of Jacksonville Florida just in light of the…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Savana Redding, a thirteen-year-old at Safford Middle School, was accompanied to the Assistant Principal Wilson’s office to be questioned about a day planner that contained knives and other illegal items, including four prescription-strength, and one over-the-counter, pain relief pills.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4)The case we read in class that I enjoyed the most was State of Connecticut v. Cardwell. I primarily liked it because it best exemplifies the difference and complexity regarding the sale of goods and the helps reflect the distinction between a “shipment” and “destination” contracts. I disagree with the trial courts judgment that Cardwell sold tickets within Connecticut and thereby violated Connecticut statute. However, I agree with the judgment of the court after the appeal. The transfer of goods occurred in Massachuestes, therefore the sale of the tickets, as defined by the code, occurred in Massachusts.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lee V. Weisman Case Study

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary of Key Facts A. Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stone v. Powell (1976) was convicted of murder in the state of California. Powell claimed that the search against him was unlawful so the gun found on him should have been inadmissible in court. He tried to file a writ of habeas corpus but a state prisoner is not granted that right since the state provided him with a full and…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case Gideon V Wainwright all started when Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested for possibly stealing pocket change, bottles of coke, beer, and wine. When Gideon went to trial Gideon believed that an attorney should be appointed to him under the 6th amendment the right to counsel ;however, the state of Florida decided that was for federal cases only. After Gideon lost his trial against the state of Florida Gideon found a way to take it further and appealed to the Supreme Court. Once Gideon appealed the supreme court took it from there mainly Hugo Black a justice that firmly believes that everyone deserves an attorney according to the 6th and 14th amendments in which he lost earlier in his career betts v. brady. Once the case was finished being…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 1: Yes, Revere is because any employer is covered by the ADA. The Act requires employers with 15 or more employees to make rational accommodations for an incapacitated employee and Revere has approximately 800 employees…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella, n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar, a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore, a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at the facility and the determination, customary at that time, was made to have Poddar involuntarily committed. Dr. Moore notified the campus police and requested that Poddar be picked up, warning that Poddar can appear quite rational at times. Campus…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clarence Earl Gideon was a man that was wrongfully convicted of a crime. Clarence had a bad background prior to the trial. His record prior was that he had felonies, and he was in jail for four times already, and he ran away from home, and was found with some stolen clothes on. His background didn’t make it easy for him to be found guilty. Gideon was accused of stealing wine, beer, money, and Coca Cola from the pool room. The charges that were brought to him was Petty theft. The evidence the state used against him was that he was seen by a witness breaking into the pool room. The sentencing that Gideon got was 5 years in a working prison. Gideon’s first trial was not in his favor, because he did not have a lawyer defending him, and he didn’t…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    White V. Gibbs Case Study

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the case of White v. Gibbs, the plaintiff, Mrs. Debbie White, sued O’Malley’s Tavern alongside Patrick Gibbs. Gibbs served as bartender at the tavern during the night in question. Mrs. White seeks settlement under the state of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act. Under the Dram Shop Act, a bartender assumes liability to any persons injured who were served alcohol while exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication (Todd, 1986). Since the two parties reside in different states, the case was brought to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The defendants, Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, sought summary judgment on their behalf. Mrs. White’s rebuttal was that the summary judgment should…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1963 Clarence Earl Gideon presented himself in front of the Supreme Court. Gideon had been indicted for breaking and entering; after defending himself in his preliminary trial he was sentenced to five years in prison. During his time in jail, Gideon did some research on law and wrote an appeal to the Supreme Court. Gideon’s request of representation was on behalf of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court decided to put the case on trial; it related back to the Betts v. Brady case of 1942. Unlike Betts v. Brady’s 6-3 ruling in which Betts had lost, Gideon won the case with an astounding 9-0 majority. The main issue of the case centers on proper representation of the defendant. In order for the reader to fully understand the scope of the case, he or she needs to consider Betts v. Brady.…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I remembered the moment when I was faced with a dire situation, when I was assistant coaching our local Jr. High Football team. The game was Lowell v.s Gilchrist. It was early in the 3rd quarter when we witnessed one of the players falling without getting hit. The coaches on the other team scrabbled to aid the young athlete, yet they didn’t understand was wrong. I came over to assistant, yet was pushed away, probably because I was only 16 and didn’t look like I could really help. Then I noticed the 6th grader twitching and realized that he was in anaphylactic shock. That’s when I suddenly asserted my place and started barking out orders. Within moments I was in charge and I took over on the care of the child. A woman that came over (I assumed…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singleton had been sentenced to death in 1979. As he began to deteriorate mentally in 1987, he exhibited paranoid and delusional symptoms. He was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Medication was necessary to control these symptoms. Ten years later, he expressed distorted beliefs and that he was going to kill a physician and the president. Because of his dangerousness, the Medical Review Panel agreed to force medication on him under a Harper involuntary medication order. The Due Process Clause allows them to do so since he is a seriously mentally ill inmate who may be a danger to himself and others and it may be in his best interests. In 2000, he had a petition filed for habeas corpus contesting that the state could not make him competent with medication and then have him executed. His petition was denied by the district court because they found “no evidence in this record that the actions and the decisions of the medical personnel involved were in any degree motivated by the desire, purpose or intent to make Mr. Singleton competent so that he could be executed”. The appellate court had two questions to answer, (1) was he competent to be executed before execution of the forced medication order? They found that he wasn’t competent enough to understand the punishment…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard Case

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The petitioner filed for habeas corpus relief in the federal courts. The question was whether Sheppard was deprived of a fair trail and his right to due process according to the Sixth Amendment. Was the petitioner denied a fair trail for the second-degree murder of his wife, of which he was convicted, because of the trail judge’s failure to protect Sheppard sufficiently from the massive, pervasive, and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution?…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays