Preview

George Owell Imperialism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1070 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
George Owell Imperialism
September 17, 2014
English 105
Composition I MWF
Owell begins the story with the discontent the police officer has with his job and India with its oppressors, keeping the conflict in the mind of the readers early on and constant. The narrator draws back on his memories which haunt him of when he had to make a choice and chose his pride. Owell often writes about imperialism, in no shape or form hiding his distaste for it and often poking fun at it, such in 1984 and Animal Farm. He was born in India and moved to
England for schooling and then joining the imperial army after becoming unhappy with British treatment of the native Burmese, he left the police service. This often influences his writings, drawing back on his personal first
…show more content…
He shoots it anyways.
His honesty towards his situation gained my trust and had me decide that he was a reliable narrator. He was brutal on both sides of the spectrum, talking of the nonsense that both countries have, and he spared no details on death the elephant caused “lying on his belly with arms crucified and head sharply twisted to the side.” and untimely the elephants “very slowly and in great agony" death. The only question I have with him is wither he really blames the
British and Burmese for his struggle rather than confront himself and see if maybe this could be inside his head, he seems to place all his judgment on them and see them as the reason of his anger not just a side effect of it. It makes me wonder if things where as bad as he made them or not. His description of the elephant changes from the first time he mentions it to point when it dies. The elephant no longer becomes just that, and animal, but more of a choice that effects the rest of his life. The elephant becomes all the things he sees wrong with Great Britain and also all the things he loves about it. He reflects his inner conflict onto the situation. He does not want
…show more content…
In his mind he also sees that but he also acknowledges that the elephant is the

biggest source of work, it does the heavy farm work and without it there would be more work for the people. Exactly like Great Britain. Like the elephant, the empire is powerful. When the elephant raids the bazaar, he symbolizes the British Empire raiding the economy of Burma
That’s not the only symbol he uses, he also uses the Burmese as a symbol of people losing themselves for power, “I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys. He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalized figure of a sahib. For it is the condition of his rule that he shall spend his life in trying to impress the "natives and so in every crisis he has got to do what the "natives" expect of him. He wears a mask, and his face grows to fit it. “
In the end he wants these peoples respect, honestly he just wants anybody’s respect, and he wants to look needed and tough. He makes the mistake of not thinking it through or seeking advice from his fellow policemen or even a merchant or anyone that was following him. He puts this misbelieved amount of pressure on himself to shoot it, he honestly could have just let it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    An Elephantine Analysis In Charles Siebert's article The Elephant Crackup, the author employs a nuanced and compelling rhetorical strategy that seamlessly integrates firsthand narratives, expert opinions, and emotional appeals to shed light on the profound consequences of human exploitation on elephants. Through the deliberate use of linguistic choices, comparisons to human tragedies, and a careful balance of ethos, pathos, and logos, Siebert effectively engages the reader, emphasising the urgent need for compassionate rehabilitation practices and fostering a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between human actions and elephant behaviour. Charles Siebert establishes his credibility as a firsthand narration (Kairos) using an anecdote,…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Elephant is the emotional side and Rider is the cognitive side, and in most circumstances, during a disagreement, the Elephant tends to overpower the Rider. One example is skipping the gym. In otherwise the Elephant is responsible when somebody fails to change because emotions suppress the ability to intelligently reason. No doubt, the Elephant is capable of immense strengths such as someone getting things done while on the other hand, the Rider ruminates in situations like decision-making. Thus, changing behavior, with ease requires appealing to both the Elephant for energy and Rider for a sense of…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Character

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page

    nothing as he delayed them. He felt that he should die in a frame of mind and that it…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finally it came to the day in which the three Elephants were to die. Due to the fact that the elephant’s were smart enough not to eat poisoned food, and also strong enough to not be effected by poison syringes, the zookeepers decided to starve the animals to death. They could often be seen performing their ‘Bonzai’ trick, which normally would have earned them food and water. Alas, even though the keepers did all they could to try and keep the animals…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A young Michael Byers in great detail states that “The stuffed African elephant on its circular dais in the rotunda was composed of billions of skin cells and tiny cilia, and its ivory tusks wore an unfalsifiable brown patina of age.” (73) Young Michael Byers uses very descriptive words to share his admiration with us. How amazing is what he is witnessing, the elephant is really old and the brown patina stands as proof of its age. But as an adult he merely says that “There were ten million African elephants in 1930, and that now there are only thirty-five thousand” they were once great but know they are almost gone.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although a representative of British power, the narrator sympathizes with the oppressed natives and their country but is forced to act according to imperial aims. When the narrator receives a call, he is commissioned to bring a runaway elephant under control. In order to defend himself in the case of an attack, he takes a rifle, which makes the natives think that the elephant is going to be shot. When the narrator arrives, he finds a peaceful elephant eating, which offers no danger. He feels as if he should not shoot, but there is the mass of natives, or as he calls “yellow faces” behind him that demand the police officer shoot the elephant. After an inner struggle, the narrator finally gives in to the power of the natives’ demanding and shoots. He has to fire several shots for the animal to die painfully. The officer cannot stand the sight and leaves while the natives have already started tearing the elephant apart. “The crowd would laugh at me. And my whole life, every white man's life in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at”. He admits that shooting the elephant was necessary as a means of demonstrating the power and ensure British…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (para. 3) On the way to find the beast the officer sees a man lying in the mud, brutally mauled and dead. After seeing this "devilish" looking man he starts to ponder that he may actually have to kill this elephant if he is in danger. Rifle in hand and a crowd behind he continues his journey. (para. 4) The officer realizes the crowd is excited at the thought he is going to kill this elephant. Killing the elephant would provide entertainment and food for them. At the bottom of the hill the officer and crowd behind see the elephant across the road "peacefully eating." The officer knows the elephant has passed it's stage of "must" and not to shoot it. He decides to observe the elephant to see if the state of "must" has truly passed instead of shooting it. (para. 5 & 6) The officer has made up his mind until he "glances" at the immense crowd cheering him on and feels uneasy about his decision. The crowd would be angry and hate the British officer more if he did not shoot. The officer is faced with the decision of either shooting the elephant and pleasing the Burmese while appearing strong and dominating as a British officer or doing the right thing by not shooting the defenceless elephant. (para. 7 & 8) A thought tips the officer over the…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    April Morning

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages

    since it was during war time and he was forced to go through much, like watching people die.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “ Elephants will often stand next to their dead kin for days, occasionally touching their bodies with their trunks.” Rifkin states that feeling grief is the main difference between being an animal and a human. They argue about animals…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British interest was obvious in the story by getting superior jobs and working in the government. As a result, it is very important to mention that the empire had produced several conflicts to the narrator that emphasis the unjust of Imperialism; one with the British Empire and the other conflict with the Burmese because of their bad treatment “I was stuck between my hatred of the empire I served and my rage against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make my job impossible. With one part of my mind I thought of the British Raj as an unbreakable tyranny, as something clamped down, in saecula saeculorum, upon the will of prostrate peoples; with another part I thought that the greatest joy in the world would be to drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest's guts. Feelings like these are the normal by-products of imperialism; ask any Anglo-Indian official, if you can catch him off duty” (Shooting an Elephant, 13).…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of the hardships and ill-treatment he has to undergo at the hands of people in authority.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Narrator 1: Elephant: Narrator 1: Narrator 2: Elephant: Narrator 1: Narrator 2: Elephant: Narrator 1: Narrator 2: Elephant: Narrator 2:…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Elephant

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Elephant” opens in medias res and is told by a third person omniscient narrator who’s knowledge do that we, as readers, can see the main character’s feelings and thoughts through the whole story; “He could not work out why, except that this haze had descended and he could not seem to lift a thought through its weight.”(p. 2, ll. 41-42) The writer’s stile of writing is giving a numb feeling. It is plane and flat like Williams life. We can sympathize with him, from the very first lines; “When you had the material stacked up, right there beside you, a pile of notes and facts, there was absolutely no reason for being unable to proceed with the next step.” (p. 1, ll. 1-2) We can already tell that William has a problem and we feel sorry for him.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    My Pet Elephant

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He said with a loud voice, “No! You can’ t have a pet elephant! I mean do you even know how to take care of an elephant?”…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his short story titled simply 'Elephant', Raymond Carver focuses on the elephant both literally and figuratively. Literally, when the author used the word elephant as the title for his short story, he made me think of the narrator in the story as hardworking because elephants are hardworking creatures. The narrator works hard to earn a living and takes his responsibilities seriously. Also, the author could have used the word elephant to bring attention to the phrase elephant in the room which means an obvious topic that everyone avoids bringing up. This short story is an accurate portrayal of symbiotic relationships in a family. People wouldn't like having to think of their family as parasites living off them and thus, nobody really likes to mention it, so the issue is left unspoken.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics