15 September 2015
Future Studies Essay
What can we expect from the future? . In our global society, many intellectuals are advocating to emit what the future should embody. Every era imagines a better future, but often not as easy to determine what types of advancement the future will manifest. Intellectuals can only research and study trends and from those trends possibly make a scholarly guess on what the outcome may be. Further, if we want a better future for our global society then we as individuals or collectively must insite new trends, philosophies and advancement. Today’s intellectuals have many different ideas of what needs to be done to evoke our species to want to invent a better tomorrow. In order to make society evolve our main way to change society for the better is to mainly perpetuate ideas or “self replicators” ,which Daniel Gilbert argues are ideas that contain a major goal of passing beliefs to other people to differentiate the way their brains operate and how they see the world. In my essay I will focus on the benefits of education after high school becoming free or costing less. I will justify my reasoning through the close examinations of articles relating to my topic , for or against, that will identify the cultural ideas, attitudes, and beliefs being explored in juxtaposition with Gilbert's idea of a self replicator. Ultimately to start with , When society has the subject of free to cost lessened education , initially we would hope that our quality of education stay intact. Quality of education is still important to the overall goal of cultivating the minds of the future. An argument against free or cost lessened education would be that like the universal healthcare that has been enacted in the U.S system, if education were to take the same course, the quality of our education would decrease. Elizabeth Marcello , a sophomore at the College of William & Mary, argues this very concept of it being impossible to have a quality education for a lesser price. Marcello author of, “The Case Against Free College” ,ferociously insists, “But that’s just it. With the absence of tuition fees, no on will be getting a free college education that is actually great, or even decent. Logically, here is what free college will look like in America: If public colleges were to abolish tuition fees, we would be kissing the quality of our education goodbye.”This statement implies because colleges would be tuition free, then those colleges wouldn't have the funds to provide a quality education and also provide the already free resources that students use to excel throughout college. Marcello also makes an overarching point, “Neither the federal nor state government is in any financial shape to add the debt of abolishing just one school’s tuition,” and, “then the salaries of our professors might also be targeted, making it less attractive for quality instructors with unique experiences to join our academic community.” and lastly collectively as citizens we would accumulate “ debt later in life when our taxes are raised”. For these reasons having college be free or cost lessened would be a problem and our fundamental college intuition would become a disgrace to our community and society because the quality of our education would decrease dramatically. Fortunately , this is only one side of the argument and also a very conservative view. This view is coming from a young lady who is already privileged and not wanting to put the effort to create a better society for everyone because she believes its “entitlement mentality” that is decreasing the strong work ethic of our society . These types of view usually evoke a sense of resentment towards the people that aren't privileged with wealth or resources, further making the intended audience, upper middle class to wealthy , a sense of not wanting to help our society become filled with more educated people from every culture and community....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document