Murdock believes that the family have to provide 4 main functions: primary socialisation, financial support, the meeting of sexual and emotional needs and reproduction. These functions need to be provided by the family in order for children to be skilled and have common knowledge for the future. As quoted from Item 2B ‘the family is seen as key to socialising children into their norms and values of society’. However, and evaluation point for Murdock would be by Marxist, Althusser whose concept was that the family is an ideological state apparatus (ISA). This meant that the family was an ideology, something socially constructed and did whatever society told to do and behave like, restricting the idea of freedom within the family that functionalists believe.
Another functionalist point of view would be from Parsons. He said that the family have two main irreducible functions that it had to carry out to satisfy society’s needs, the husband and wife had set roles and that the nuclear family was the functional ‘fit’ in society. The two irreducible functions of the family that Parsons stated was the stabilisation of adult personality and the importance of primary socialisation. The stabilisation of adult personalities meant that women were supposed to meet the emotional needs of the husband and other members within the family. Also, the two roles that the male and female were ‘assigned’ in a household were expressive and instrumental. Men would carrying out the instrumental roles where they would do paid work and bring home the money and women carried out the expressive role where they were the salves of wage (Bentson) and had to take care of the children and husbands mental and emotional needs. However this concept was criticised by Marxist sociologist, Zaretsky, who says the family is safe haven. By this, the warm bath theory is reinforced, as the family is the place where you can find peace and be away from all the cryptic things going on around them.
Fletcher is another functionalist sociologists who has other views towards the family’s provision for society. Believes that the family carries out essential roles and the state carries out the non-essential roles. The essential roles are things such as primary socialisation, provision of food and shelter and being financially stable. The non-essential roles that the welfare state provide are things that link to wider society such as the NHS. However, this idea is also criticised by the Marxist sociologist, Engles. Engles believes that the family is only constructed as a ‘unit of consumption’. This means it is a target for capitalism and people who own big companies, especially children as we are now living in a child centre society and they are becoming the main target for the bourgeoisie.
Overall, we can see that functionalist sociologist have a fairly positive view of what the family brings towards society and its main functions. We can also see how all of the functionalist’s perspectives can be evaluated with the opposing perspective, Marxism. We see that Marxists believe highly that the family is revolved around the capitalistic society, where mostly the middle and upper class benefit more than working class, which is highly un-meritocratic. We can also come to full conclusion that society would not work without the existence of family as each member of the family give to the society in one way or another.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Functionalism is a macro theory and so looks at things on a large scale they consist of structural theorists. They see society as being similar to a human body, in that the essential organs in the body perform specific functions. This is like society as one of the essential organs in society is the family, as it performs essential functions which serve the needs of the family. And that each part of the body works in harmony with all other parts just like society which works in harmony with all other parts. Over the course of time the family has changed and evolved and so has its functions this is known as ‘the March in Progress.’ Even though the functions may have changed slightly according to the functionalists the role of the family is still essential for society.…
- 1053 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
It is useful to consider how the family supports wider society. Functionalism considers this by deciding what functions the family must perform and therefore which type would suit society best.…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Functionalists sociologist Talcott Parsons in 1955, had viewed a biological division of labour roles within the family, which benefit family at most from this and most of society as well. Secondary Parsons saw the gender roles as expressive and instrumental, which mean that gender roles were unequal so the husband have to play the instrumental role in the family of being the ‘breadwinner’ by providing financial stability to theirs family and the wife who had to follow the expressive role by looking out for the emotional welfare of the family, socialising the children and being housewife.…
- 1020 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The functionalists think the role of the family is extremely important and that the nuclear family is the best form, they think the nuclear family runs more smoothly as they learn the correct norms and values so our society can live in a consensus. Families also provide primary socialisation, and functionalists believe this should be done in the correct environment. As all families teach their children the same norms and values this can ensure individuals experience solidarity. Also the family helps organic analogy, as the family aids society in supporting other institutions. Functionalists believe that individuals or families that are no in a consensus are in a state if anomie and are given sanctions for this. The family produces the next set of responsible individuals, workers and parents so they need to ensure that these people fit into the existing society appropriately.…
- 1423 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
A good wife always knows her place (The Good Wife’s guide, slide 15). I think that this is a key statement when describing structural functionalism in the 1940’s and 1950’s. In this era of time we do not see many variations within the family. When you compared Family A, B, and C, you would find that all were nuclear families or a traditional families consisting of a father, mother, and children. To construct a theory based on the structural functionalism was a much simpler task as families were alike, general roles were assigned and followed and the family functioned in very similar ways.…
- 368 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Functionalism also focuses on the functions of the family and how having a stable and functional family contributes to the…
- 2733 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Functionalists see the family as providing many important values to society. They believe behaviour is constructed by social forces, the government and the individual is made and controlled by society therefore according to this approach every individual is a product of society. Society essentially makes the person, but not solely. Family and other contributing factors heavily shape a personality along with their actions. Also they believe society is like the human body, that if one aspect is removed such as the family, it will not function properly or at all.…
- 607 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Marxist and Feminist sociologists have criticised Murdoch’s theory. They say that Functionalism ignores conflict and exploitation within society. Feminists see the family as being patriarchal and serving the needs of men and Marxists see the family as meeting the needs of capitalism and not the needs of the family members.…
- 676 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Functionalists believe that society is based on a shared value consensus, this is a set of shared norms and values into which society socialises its members, This enables society to work without any disagreements and meet society’s goals and needs. Functionalists believe that the family is regarded as a basic building block of society. George Murdock (1949) argues that the family performs four functions to meet the needs of society and its members. These functions are; economic needs, reproduction, primary socialisation and sex. Economic function is providing shelter and food for all family members. Sexual function is allowing the sex drive to be satisfied with one partner and therefore preventing conflict. Reproductive function means to produce next generation; have kids. Socialisation function is teaching the norms and values of society to offsprings.…
- 605 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
George Murdock (1897-1985) claimed that in all societies families have functions. He claims that in order for family to function properly sexual function is allowed and reproductive function to extend. In addition, socialisation is also taught in family in order for individual to behave and the economic factor which can be use as a financial source.…
- 438 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
According to Parsons, in the traditional nuclear family, the roles of husbands and wives are segregated. His functionalist model of the family shows a clear division of labour between spouses, with the husbands having instrumental roles, known as providing for the family, and wives having expressive roles to do with socialising the children and being a homemaker. This allows the husband, and the wife to have clear set out tasks but on the other hand, people could say the women have more to deal with and the men have less to do. Parsons also argues that the division of labour is natural because women are ‘naturally’ suited to the nurturing role and the men to that of a provider. Other sociologists have criticised Parsons, for example, Young and Willmott argue that men are now taking a greater share of domestic tasks and more wives are becoming wage earners. Furthermore, feminist sociologists reject Parsons’ view that the division of labour is natural, and that it only benefits men. From Parson’s idea of family roles, it could be argued that the family roles have not changed at all, yet the criticisms show that the family roles have changed a little.…
- 779 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Functionalists stress the positive aspect of family. In particular, they force on the positive role of one particular family type: the nuclear family.…
- 690 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In this essay, I intend to analyse some of the theories behind the functionalist perspective of the family, it is my intention to look at two main theorists in this field, Murdock and Parsons. I to analyse their theories and give objective argument for the pros and cons of the functionalist family. I intend to break this down by looking at the theorists separately and then looking at arguments against the functionalist family.…
- 1386 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In Talcott Parson’s functionalist model, there is a clear division between the spouses’ role. The husband is said to have an instrumental role, which is geared towards achieving success at work in order to provide for the family’s financial needs; he is the breadwinner. The wife, however, has an expressive role, geared towards primary socialisation of the children and meeting the family’s emotional needs; she is the homemaker and a fulltime housewife rather than a wage earner.…
- 735 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Functionalist sociologist parsons argues that the nuclear family roles are segregated. He believed that division of labour is based of biological differences so women naturally suiting to the caring role. He also believed the nuclear family was important for teaching children cultural values and discipline as well as structuring a Childs personality. Parson says a nuclear family is made of prove, warmth, security and support. Many feminists disagreed with his theory as they argued it took away women equalities.…
- 753 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays