Preview

Steven Levitt and Conventional Wisdom

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
656 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Steven Levitt and Conventional Wisdom
Freakonomics is best described by the title of its introductory chapter “The Hidden Side of Everything”. It puts a spin on conventional wisdom by looking at it through very different and unusual perspectives. This book was written by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner and was published by HarperCollins Publishers Inc. A very unusual trait of this book is that, unlike most books, it honestly has no theme. In fact, it is often stated within the book that there is no theme. In the introductory chapter Stephen Levitt explained that when he and Stephen Dubner were asked by their colleagues what the book’s theme is they would just reply that they didn’t know and when the colleagues tried to connect a theme to the book they would just smile and say “you’re right, that’s the theme”. The authors’ main concern was to make people challenge conventional wisdom. They were trying to make readers question things they normally wouldn’t question or think about things they normally wouldn’t think about. Things such as are teachers like sumo wrestlers and are real- estate agents like the KKK. Even though those topics are very interesting, the two most interesting topics is do parents make that big a difference in their child’s future and what was really the cause of the crime drop in the 1990’s. Levitt and Dubner went into great detail to prove that there is a hidden side to what people believe. For example, the crime of the 1990’s brought about many different professionals giving many different causes of the sudden drop in crime. Some of the various explanations that professions came up with were:
• Innovative policing strategies
• Tougher gun controls
• Strong economy
• And an increased number of police.
However, only a couple of the explanations seemed to have and correlation to the crime drop at all. By questioning the conventional wisdom of the professionals and their explanations Levitt and Dubner proposed another explanation that, while very

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Esteemed economists and writers, Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, wrote the book Freakonomics to delve into the inner workings of economics. Freakonomics discloses the unpredictable effects of incentives beneath ordinary situations. Levitt and Dubner sail on an informal tone by asking questions and breaking up their writing, in order to maintain a witty connection with the audience.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “An expert must be bold if he hopes to alchemize his homespun theory into conventional wisdom …nuance often doesn’t get much attention.” Written by New York Times journalist Stephen J. Dubner and co-authored by John Bates Clark Medal awardee Steven D. Levitt, Freakonomics addresses those conventional wisdoms conceived by the partisan tendencies of the experts behind them; it delves into the economics, or as Levitt puts it, “incentives,” behind…everything. Freakonomics does not attempt to constrain itself to discussion of exchange of goods and services. Its application of economic principles to a variety of scenarios ensures that the book appeals to a general audience rather than remaining an obscure book only read by the academia.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many authors usually incorporate a theme in their piece of writing. A theme is basically the subject of talk on what the author’s personal feelings are. In the short story The Lottery by Shirley Jackson the theme is the danger of blindly following traditions can eventually lead to you being cruel. The following theme with be supported through characterization and setting.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economics is defined as the study of financial trends. Freakonomics by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner examines the hidden side of everyday events that Levitt has studied throughout his career. Levitt has found that unconventional ways of collecting data and measuring data are occasionally the correct way to put the world in terms that we can all understand.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A theme that would describe the book is Censorship, or restriction. Censorship would be a good theme to describe the book because the story is about books being banned in the future because those who read books will have a higher intellect than others. They want to put a restriction to people reading books because it would mean that one person will be higher than the other just because he or she has read more books than any other human on this Earth. It would also mean that everyone isn’t equal because of books.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    - Themes: There are three noticeable themes within this story. The first is the general abuse of power from people of higher authority. Though it may not be evident many high authorities may abuse their powers. Another theme that is definitely showing is that of racism. In the story, Frank would only take advantage of his Native American patients, and many people in the book disregarded Native Americans. One final theme that ran throughout the story was that of whether family loyalty or justice was more important. Wes was forced to choose between these two topics and in the end he chose justice, which was not supported by his own father.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rikki Carvi Theme Essay

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The theme is defined as a main idea or an underlying meaning of a literary work that may be stated directly or indirectly. In the first part of the novel “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi” by Rudyard Kipling, the primary topic is courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear. The alternate topic is love triumphs over all. The primary reason for courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear is due to Rikki wasn’t scared for a long time when he saw Nag. The alternate reason for love triumphs over all is due to Rikki killed the snakes that tried to put the family to death and killed the eggs as well. In the exposition, we did learn that it’s is difficult for a snake to scare a mongoose. Let's see which theme is right.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Levitt's Freakonomics

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    The central thesis and argument of this segment of Freakonomics are the reasons why the rates of crime in the United States rapidly reduce in recent years. I think this argument that Steven Levitt reasonably explains about decreasing American criminal rates in possible points. As Levitt’s explanations, he is arguing that an increase in the reliance on prisons, innovative policing strategies, changes in the crack market, lawful enforcements including to increase in police nationwide and gun-control laws, and a legalization of abortion. I personally also think that all of these reasons are definitely…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theme of a story helps give readers a deeper understanding of what the text is all about. Theme gives a moral to the story, or a lesson to be learned. In Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 the theme was happiness. Throughout the whole story the main character, Montag, is trying to see if he’s really happy. When he discovers that he is not, he goes on a search to find out why. In the text it reads, “We need not be let alone. We need to be really bothered once in a while. How long is it since you were really bothered? About something important, about something real?” (Bradbury 49). Here in this quote, Montag is speaking to his wife, Mildred. Montag is going on about books and how amazed he is by them. This makes Mildred very uncomfortable because books are seen as evil to the majority of the people, and she asks Montag to leave her alone. Now Montag responds by telling her that they need to be really bothered by something important and real sometimes; that it is important to feel these intense emotions. The world that Montag and Mildred live in delivers immediate happiness with instantaneous form of entertainment such as the television and radio. This constant supply of ‘enjoyment’ suppresses real emotions in people, such as Mildred. Mildred is in so much emotional pain but she doesn’t even really know it because she is constantly surrounding herself with her ‘family’ from her television programmes. Montag believes that to be happy one needs to be able to feel all different kinds of emotions, even the annoying kinds.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many commonly conceivable explanations are given as the answer to this such as increased number of police, more imprisonment, and an expanded police force. However, a more anomalous explanation for the drop in crime was that of legalized abortion. When abortion was made legal after the Roe vs. Wade case, the amount of women who had abortions increased dramatically. Levitt stated that studies showed, “childhood poverty and a single-parent household-are among the strongest predictors that a child will have a criminal future”(138). He also explained that “abortion led to less unwantedness; unwantedness leads to high crime; legalized abortion, therefore, led to less crime”(139). This theory is something that reaches so far out of the common person’s comfort zone and appears to be so unbelievable; it stretches beyond our common way of thinking. However, the statistics suggest that this could be a very accurate reason behind the drastic drop in crime. For example, a statistic Levitt includes in his argument states, “Since 1985, states with high abortion rates have experienced a roughly 30 percent drop in crime relative to low-abortion…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freakonomics

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the novel Freakonomics, Levit and Dubner try to take a unique approach to analyzing reasons behind why things occur in our society. Essentially, “What this book is about is stripping a layer or two from the surface of modern life and seeing what is happening underneath.” (10) A perfect example of this is how they discovered that the legalization of abortion was the cause of crime dropping to its lowest level in thirty-five years. While most expert economists simply attributed the drop to the wellness of the economy, the increase in gun control laws and the new policing strategies, Levit and Dubner searched for other possibilities where no one else thought to look. That is when they realized that approximately twenty years before the drastic drop in crime, abortion was legalized. Studies have shown that “… a child born into an adverse family environment is far more likely than other children to become a criminal.” (4) Thus, this theory was proven further by the fact that around the time when these children would have begun committing crimes, there was significantly less crime.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of the themes is that some of the people aren’t satisfied with the way they live. The motif of…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The theme is an attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature. The moral is that the shape of society must depend on the ethical nature of the individual and not on any political system however apparently logical or respectable. The whole book is symbolic in nature."…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article states that Messrs Donohue and Steven D. Levitt “did not run the test they thought they had—an ‘inadvertent but serious computer programming error’” (Oops-onomics). Economists Christopher Foote and Christopher Goetz looked into the facts and test of Donohue and Levitt in order to recognize if their conclusion was correct. Their evidence and tests were not run correctly, which reduces the number of abortions that lowered crime rates by almost one-half. Furthermore, the article also states that Donohue and Levitt “seek to explain arrest totals (e.g., the 465 Alabamians of 18 years of age arrested for violent crime in 1989), not arrest rates per head (i.e., 6.6 arrests per 100,000)” (Oops-onomics), which helps support the claim there is less crime taking place, because “a smaller cohort will obviously commit fewer crimes in total” (Oops-onomics). Additionally, when Foote and Goetz used arrest rates per head for their research, the amount of crime rose, disproving Donohue and Levitt’s claim that abortions help stop crime. That being said, Levitt and Dubner’s inferences drawn from an insufficient amount of evidence, leads many critics to accuse them of hasty…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue’s facing police departments in today’s society, in my opinion are; the increase in crime rates due to the poor economy and lack of jobs available, civil law suits due to “crocket cops”, safety of law enforcement officers, policing multicultural communities which can be very stressful for law enforcement, they are understaffed, and corruption which has destroyed the public faith in law enforcement and is what triggers the civil law suits. I feel if each of these things was addressed individually and one at a time they would be fixed. In 2010 The Thin Blue Line listed the 5 biggest challenges facing police forces today which were; governance; “The tripartite model of Home Office, Police Authority & Chief Constable is at best opaque with a mass confusion over roles and responsibilities”, cost and cuts; “after years of growth the service is under increasing pressure to demonstrate they are more financially efficient. Without necessarily creating advocating mergers or one national force, many of the proposed cuts and savings could be effectively delivered by smarter volume central purchasing arrangements and sharing of resources”, resources; “of 143,000 warranted officers, only 11% are at any one time visibly policing the streets” which in my opinion is a major problem when trying to control crime in high crime areas, crime and detections; “reducing crime and increasing detections” which the only way this can happen is by adding more law enforcement officers to each jurisdiction, and operational priorities; “refocus the priorities of policing back to the Peelian principles, the main emphasis should always be the protection of life and property, the prevention and detection of crime” which the Department of Homeland Securities assist in this area.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays