Preview

Franco-German Relationship Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1766 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Franco-German Relationship Analysis
The relationship between France and Germany still remains one of the most important relations in the European Union. Both countries have significant power in the European Union due to their cooperation. Sometimes, European countries call the relationship between Germany and France the “twin engine”, as their treaties always work as the basis for further integration of the European Union. Although the Franco-German relationship is old, it continues to be vital today. According to one German professor of the International Relations and the chair of the department of political and social sciences at the European University Institute (European University Institute, 2015), Ulrich Krotz, “a long-term perspective on the Franco-German relationship …show more content…
The concept of the ‘hereditary enmity’ between France and Germany has deep historical roots, which starts from the very beginning up to 1945. Although, their relationship starts earlier, the period of the ‘hereditary enmity’ is considered to be the days of the intense hatred and wars between France and Germany. It is mostly from the times of the Franco-Prussian War from 1870 – 1871, the war between the Napoleon Empire and the German state, which tried to reach the European hegemony. Formally, the war was started by Napoleon III, despite the fact that the main prerequisite of the Franco-Prussian war was the provocation of the first Prussian chancellor – Otto von Bismarck, who was one of the initiators of the partial unification of Germany, while some of the German leaders and foreign authorities were against. German nationalists believed that unification of Germany would help to replace France as the dominant power in the …show more content…
Looking from the long-term perspective, Franco-German relationship in Europe has a strong point, because the relationship strengthens by the accent on the fundamental nature and the main supports of the Franco-German relationship of the past half-century, frequently referred to in terms such as ‘tandem’, ‘pair’, and ‘couple’. This relationship might be considered ‘friendship’, due to the Elysee Treaty in 22nd January, 1963, which was reached after the Second World War as the end of the rivalry between France and Germany (Traité de l’Elysée, 1963). The Elysee Treaty, with numerous renewals and additions, has defined and remained at the core of France and Germany’s “regularized bilateral intergovernmentalism” (Krotz, Regularized Intergovernmentalism, 2010). The term of ‘intergovernmentalism’, which was firstly proposed by the Paul and Catherine Buttenweiser University professor – Stanley Hoffmann, refers to the theory of the regional integration (Keohane, 1991). The semi-annual summits involved not only the German chancellor and French President with the French Prime Minister, but also several ministries such as the Minister of the foreign affairs, the Minister of defense and the Minister of the finance department. In virtue of the involvement of more and more people in these meetings, the summits grew in its breadth significantly as well as in the depth. (Krotz & de

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    To begin with, one would have to look at the various factors that led to souring in relations between countries, for example, “Weltpolitik”. Germany was a new country, and had industrialized pretty quickly. Its nationalism was growing which led its imperialistic attitude. Thus it had ditched “realpolitik” and cast its eyes on the rest of the world. Germany did not “want to place anyone in the shadow,” but still have “a place under the sun.” Britain and other leading powers did not want Germany to have an empire, because they were scared it would make Germany even more powerful. Germany accused them of double standards and led to it feeling resentful to the other countries.…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Alsace-Lorraine

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a region with ambiguous boundary distributions, Alsace-Lorraine had created conflict between the two countries of France and German, establishing controversy as to whether the country would come under whose control after the Franco-Prussian War when the region was ceded to Prussia. While newly united Germans felt they knew better what is good for them and forced its ethnic identity on the Alsace-Lorraine people, France, in recovery, and its nationalistic aspiration was devastated by the war; and within the region itself, conflictions became inevitable due to the fact that a portion of the population rejected Germanization and held sentiment toward France, and the others were impressed and took pride in lining up with the German states.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck worked on the two issues, unification of Germany and isolation of France (Germany's mortal enemy). He believed that as long as Britain, Russia and Italy were assured of the peaceful nature of the German Empire, the French could be contained. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s style of working and understanding of foreign relations strengthened and unified other European powers against Germany in time for World War I. There are numerous examples of how reversal in policies of Wilhelm II acted as a catalyst to trigger off sensitive issues such as militarism, nationalism, imperialism and caused imbalance in the alliances leading to the onset of The First World War.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    World War I ended very badly for the Prussians. They were broken into smaller nations. Lands were taken from them. Their methods of wealth gathering from previous investments were seized away from them. Any possible modes of financial stability were looking bleaker with the continuance of the reparations coming out of the Great War. Even when the new Germany did create wealth, the French would take it away from them because of overdue payments. There was no financial hope because the French were so relentless with their strict enforcement of the Treaty of Versailles. The enduring vengeance that the French leaders had towards Germany after WWI was eventually viewed by Germans as greed. The ruthless attitude of the French capitalists developed into an overall…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay, we will focus on the development of the events on The Western Front where Germany faced France. All the powers had thought and planned their war strategy very accurately.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1940 France was invaded by Nazi Germany. The Germans swept through eastern France and had conquered the country within a month. This essay explores how the Germans won so decisively in 1940 and what went wrong for the allies. I have found that the main points accounting to the fall of France was the excellent German planning, the poor French leadership, superior German tactics and French “defeatism”.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Franco-Prussian war (1870-1871) established Germany as a powerful empire. Some of the worst fighting in the war was between France and Germany. Leading up to the World the two countries had experienced decades of tension. France was not getting fooled and could see that over the course of the 19th century the Germanic…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles was a monumental stage in German history, helping to shape German history for arguably the best part of thirty years. It can be argued that the Treaty was the most significant event since the unification of Germany in 1890. The short term consequences were also highly prominent as over 300,000 Germans fled to America in the years 1917-23. Moreover many Germans were aggrieved by the Treaty, this lead to public exploits (Kapp Putsch and Munich Putsch) that lead to casualties accumulating into the 1000’s. With so much death and despair in Germany in the 1920’s the Treaty of Versailles effectively crippled Germany both economically and mentally. Furthermore the effects did not only stretch to the late 20’s, Hitler used the Treaty as a major campaigning point to secure chancellorship in 1933. Hitler still held severe indignations over the Treaty of Versailles and still held a personal vendetta with the parent countries that imposed such harsh terms on Germany in 1917. Although the Treaty of Versailles was a pivotal stage in shaping German history there are other corresponding factors such as the erection of the Berlin wall in 1961, consequently perpetually separating East and West Berlin for 28 years. After the wall came down in 1989, Germany became reunified in 1990, arguably the most significant turning point in German history as it enabled Germany to prosper as a whole nation, since then Germany has gone on to establish itself as a world superpower, both militarily and economically. It is difficult to come to a definitive answer on what the biggest turning point is, however I plan to analyse pivotal points in German history, dating from 1917-1990.…

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1862, Bismarck said that ‘the great questions of the day will be settled by blood and iron.’ Although there is undoubtedly some degree of accuracy in this statement, the most important reason for the unification of Germany, which ended ‘the great questions of the day,’ was ‘coal and iron.’ This is a quote from British economist John Maynard Keynes, who argued that the industrial and economic preparation before the wars, which united Germany, were more important. This is because the economic strength created by the rapid industrialisation enabled the creation of a powerful Prussia. It was under this powerful Prussia, with some skilful diplomacy and opportunism, that Germany was successfully united in the wars of German Unification. Without such economic development and prosperity, it is questionable whether Germany would have been united by 1871. On the other hand we must also consider the other factors and thus must address five key areas. The first of these is the growing strength of Prussia in relation to Austria and closely linked to this is the economic developments within Prussia. On a much larger scale we must also take into account the strength of nationalism and the international situation of the 1860s. Lastly, we must consider whether the policies and strategies of Otto Von Bismarck, the Minister-President of Prussia from 1862 had a major impact on the Unification of Germany in 1871, nevertheless we are justified by saying that the main reason for the unification of Germany in 1871 was due to the economic prowess of Prussia in relation to other foreign nations such as Austria.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    War of 1812 Causes

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Document 1: This excerpt is from a report from the Committee on Foreign Relations of the U.S. House of Representatives on our nation 's growing conflict with France and Great Britain…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leading up to World War I, countries with similar cultures had a desire to unite with other each other to form a powerful country. When denied this wish, countries, such as Serbia, felt the need to take violent actions. Nationalism also compelled countries to join the war because they wanted revenge. The desire for revenge was particularly strong in the French, who wanted vengeance for their loss in the Franco-Prussian War, which costed them parts of Alsace and Lorraine, that they still longed to retrieve. A country that has great pride can have stronger aspirations for revenge than usual, which may lead them to start another…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The importance of the alliance system that developed in Europe in the decades before World War I as a cause for it is still an important topic of debate and argument between modern historians. Some argue that the alliance system was a direct cause of the outbreak of war between all major countries in Europe while other historians prefer to state that the alliance configuration we observe before the war started was simply a symptom of the conflicts and disagreements, fears and envies that had been accumulating since the Bismarck system of alliances collapsed, and even before then. This last opinion is becoming more accepted as the one that describes the true importance of the actual alliance system as a cause of the war. In order to determine the importance of the alliance system as a cause for the war we must first explore the origins of these alliances. We will take high-point of the Bismarck system in 1878 as our starting point as the Franco-Prussian war is a key factor for the development of this system.…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years before 1914, tension had been building in Europe. One cause of tension was overseas colonies. For example Germany and France clashed over in Morocco, between 1905 and 1911. This started by France who wanted to have more colonies in Africa. As Germany disliked this idea and wanted to test the “alliance” between France and Britain, he decided to support Morocco’s independence. His only intention was to bother France and to test him, as he thought that the alliance France had with Britain was just a paper. France was angry with Germany’s ideas. He thought that Germany hadn’t anything to do in their affairs. At an international conference in Algeciras, in 1906, Germany was humiliated by France and Britain in front of the whole world and he was treated as inferior. This made Germany bitter. This proved that this two old rivals, France and Britain were now seemed very close and that it was more than just a paper. In 1911 France tried to take over Morocco again. They said that they were ready to compensate Germany if trade suffered as a result but in response, Germany send a gunboat to Agadir. Britain disliked this action taken by Germany because he feared that he could take control over the Mediterranean. So another conference was called where Germany, for the second time, was humiliated. As a consequence, France finally could take over Morocco while they tried, with Britain, to defend the Mediterranean in case Germany did something. As finally we can see that Germany’s ideas of the alliance between France and Britain were wrong and that the one that left hurt was Germany.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite all of the representatives here have differing objectives and aspirations, France suggests and agrees to the creation of an international organization that would aim to resolve issues peacefully and justly. The ’14 Points’ suggested by the US President Wilson may form the essential roots to the formation of this international community, however, with certain adjustments that may be seen as necessary by the members of the forum. While France is open to appropriate negotiations that can reduce the potential of a future war, France cannot help but reiterate its position as far as the discussions on Germany and its due reparations are…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moving on, the Anglo-French relations are not end here. They are continued with the Anglo-French defense agreement in 2010. David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy adopted an especially different tone as they both hailed a landmark 50-year Anglo-French treaty on defense and security, including a shared aircraft carrier group, a 10,000-strong shared expeditionary force and development of shared nuclear testing…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays