Running head Personal Film Evaluation Criteria Paper
Personal Film Evaluation Criteria Paper
University of Phoenix
Personal Film Evaluation Criteria
Flashing back on all the films I have watched over the years I never taken notice to analyze not one of them the way that I have learned in this film study course. My techniques used as of the present time for evaluation the qualities of films has just began because I have started this course. The way how I view films back then is totally different now. Throughout the five weeks of the course I have encountered several techniques and approaches to evaluate films. Viewing films goes deeper than the pleasure and enjoyment as a viewer one must be aware of other aspects and different approaches that go with filmmaking such as auteur cult, psychoanalytical, personality, humanistic, genre, political, gender, and eclectic. I will discuss auteur and genre this two are one of many techniques and approaches that influence my viewing the most.
Auteur is one approach that seems to influences my viewing the most because just like a painting, writer, or a musician there is a distinctive difference in the style and practice in the word auteur and auteur theory is a film director who practice accords with the theory. In others words instead of the actors or storyline bringing the moviegoers or audiences to the theaters it is the directory in auteur films that has this affect and effect. However, definitely consideration of the director’s five film depicts certain style is an auteur. The word auteur first coined to describe the mark of a film director on his films by Francois Truffaut. Therefore, when evaluating a film using the auteur approach, I must take a careful look into the directorial style, reflection of the director vision, the director’s strongest impressions, and personality, his or her unique creativity in shaping the material. Most noted auteur was Alfred Hitchcock, Frederico Fellini, and...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document